Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.  A way of statistically testing a hypothesis by comparing the data to values predicted by the hypothesis ◦ Data that fall far.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.  A way of statistically testing a hypothesis by comparing the data to values predicted by the hypothesis ◦ Data that fall far."— Presentation transcript:

1 Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker

2  A way of statistically testing a hypothesis by comparing the data to values predicted by the hypothesis ◦ Data that fall far from the predicted values provide evidence against the hypothesis 2STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

3 1. State a hypothesis that you would like to find evidence against 2. Get data and calculate a statistic 1.Sample mean 2.Sample proportion 3. Hypothesis determines the sampling distribution of our statistic 4. If the sample value is very unreasonable given our initial hypothesis, then we conclude that the hypothesis is wrong 3STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

4  Assumptions ◦ Type of data, population distribution, sample size  Hypotheses ◦ Null hypothesis  H 0 ◦ Alternative hypothesis  H 1  Test Statistic ◦ Compares point estimate to parameter value under the null hypothesis  P-value ◦ Uses the sampling distribution to quantify evidence against null hypothesis ◦ Small p-value is more contradictory  Conclusion ◦ Report p-value ◦ Make formal rejection decision (optional)  Useful for those that are not familiar with hypothesis testing 4STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

5  How unusual is the observed test statistic when the null hypothesis is assumed true? ◦ The p-value is the probability, assuming that the null hypothesis is true, that the test statistic takes values at least as contradictory to the null hypothesis as the value actually observed  The smaller the p-value, the more strongly the data contradicts the null hypothesis 5STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

6  In addition to reporting the p-value, sometimes a formal decision is made about rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis ◦ Most studies require small p-values like p<.05 or p<.01 as significant evidence against the null hypothesis  “The results are significant at the 5% level”  α=.05 6STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

7  p-value<.01 ◦ Highly significant  “Overwhelming evidence” .01<p-value<.05 ◦ Significant  “Strong evidence” .05<p-value<.1 ◦ Not Significant  “Weak evidence  p-value>.1 ◦ Not Significant  “No evidence”  Whether or not a p-value is considered significant typically depends on the discipline that is conducting the study 7STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

8  Significance level ◦ Alpha level  α  Number such that one rejects the null hypothesis if the p-values is less than it  Most common are.05 and.01 ◦ Needs to be chosen before analyzing the data  Why? 8STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

9 9 Decision Reject H 0 Do Not Reject H 0 Condition of H 0 True Type I Error Correct False Correct Type II Error STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

10  α=probability of Type I error  β=probability of Type II error  Power=1-β ◦ The smaller the probability of Type I error, the larger the probability of Type II error and the smaller the power  If you ask for very strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis (very small α), it is more likely that you fail to detect a real difference  In reality, α is specified, and the probability of Type II error could be calculated, but the calculations are often difficult 10STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

11  In a criminal trial someone is assumed innocent until proven guilty ◦ What type of error (in terms of hypothesis testing) would be made if an innocent person is found guilty? ◦ What type of error would be made if a guilty person is found not guilty? ◦ What does the Power represent (1-β)?  Also, the reason we only do not reject H 0 instead of saying that we accept H 0 is because of the way our hypothesis tests are set up  Just like in a criminal trial someone is found not guilty instead of innocent STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 1811

12  If the consequences of a Type I error are very serious, then α should be small ◦ Criminal trial example  In exploratory research, often a larger probability of Type I error is acceptable  If the sample size increases, both error probabilities decrease 12STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

13  Which area of study would be most likely to use a very small level of significance? ◦ Social Sciences ◦ Medical ◦ Physical Sciences STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 1813

14  H 0 : p=p 0 ◦ p 0 is the value we are testing against  H 1 : p≠p 0 ◦ Most common alternative hypothesis  This is called a two-sided hypothesis since it includes values falling on two sides of the null hypothesis (above and below) 14STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

15  The z-score has a standard normal distribution ◦ The z-score measures how many estimated standard errors the sample proportion falls from the hypothesized population proportion  The farther the sample proportion falls from p 0 the larger the absolute value of the z test statistic, and the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis ◦ Sample size restrictions 15STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

16  Let p denote the proportion of Floridians who think that government environmental regulations are too strict  A telephone poll of 824 people conducted in June 1995 revealed that 26.6% said regulations were too strict ◦ Test H 0 : p=.5 at α=.05 ◦ Calculate the test statistic ◦ Find the p-value and interpret 16STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

17  Has the advantage that different test results from different tests can be compared ◦ Always a number between 0 and 1, no matter why type of data is being examined  Probability that a standard normal distribution takes values more extreme than the observed z-score  The smaller the p-value, the stronger the evidence against the null hypothesis and in favor of the alternative hypothesis 17STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

18  The research hypothesis is usually the alternative hypothesis (H 1 or H A ) ◦ The alternative is the hypothesis that we want to prove by rejecting the null hypothesis  Assume that we want to prove that μ is larger than a particular number μ 0 ◦ We need a one-sided test with hypotheses  Null hypothesis can also be written with an equals sign 18STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

19  For a large sample test of the hypothesis the z test statistic equals 1.04 ◦ Find the p-value and interpret ◦ Suppose z=2.5 rather than 1.04, find the p-value  Does this provide stronger or weaker evidence against the null hypothesis? ◦ Now consider the one-sided alternative  Find the p-value and interpret  For one-sided tests, the calculation of the p-value is different  “Everything at least as extreme as the observed value” is everything above the observed value in this case  Notice the alternative hypothesis 19STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

20  Two sided tests are more common in practice  Look for formulations like ◦ “test whether the mean has changed” ◦ “test whether the mean has increased” ◦ “test whether the mean is the same” ◦ “test whether the mean has decreased” 20STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 18

21  If someone wanted to test to see if the average miles a social worker drives in a month was at least 2000 miles, what would H 1 be? H 0 ? 1.μ<2000 2.μ≤2000 3.μ≠2000 4.μ≥2000 5.μ>2000 6.μ=2000 STA 291 Fall 2009 Lecture 1821


Download ppt "Lecture 18 Dustin Lueker.  A way of statistically testing a hypothesis by comparing the data to values predicted by the hypothesis ◦ Data that fall far."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google