Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCameron Lewis Modified over 9 years ago
1
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith Chapter 21 Further aspects of capital expenditure decisions
2
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 2 Income taxes and capital expenditure analysis In profit-seeking firms income taxes are usually payable ÙTaxation payments are cash flows ÙTaxation implication must be considered in any cash flows arising from a capital expenditure proposal
3
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 3 After-tax cash flows After-tax cash flows ÙCash flows after all the tax implications have been taken into account continued
4
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 4 After-tax cash flows Tax effect of an increase in sales ÙConsider incremental revenue and cots rising from a capital expenditure decision continued
5
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 5 After-tax cash flows Tax effect of incremental cash inflow continued
6
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 6 After-tax cash flows Non-cash expenses ÙSuch as depreciation ÙAre not cash flows ÙCan produce tax savings and, hence, savings in cash outflows continued
7
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 7 After-tax cash flows Some cash flows do not appear on the profit statement in the same period in which they occur ÙPurchase of a depreciable asset is a cash out- flow in the period of purchase, but not an expense of the current period ÙCash outflows from purchase have no direct tax consequences continued
8
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 8 continued
9
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 9 After-tax cash flows Timing of tax payments ÙCash flows resulting from income taxes do not occur in the same year as the before-cash flows Timing of cash flows ÙCash flows from a proposal are not always recognised as revenue or expenses in the same year ÙSlight timing differences are difficult to include in a capital expenditure analysis
10
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 10 Depreciation Australian tax laws allow two methods of depreciation ÙStraight-line (or prime cost) ÙDiminishing value, based on written-down value of the asset The method used will affect the after-tax cash flow projections continued
11
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 11 Depreciation Taxation versus accounting depreciation The impact on cash flows of a capital expenditure project will result from taxation depreciation, not accounting depreciation
12
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 12 Profit and loss on disposal Profits or losses on disposal of assets have tax effects and, hence, affect cash flows ÙUse the book value resulting from taxation deprecation to calculate profit/loss on disposal continued
13
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 13 Profit and loss on disposal Profit on disposal
14
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 14 Profit and loss on disposal Loss on disposal
15
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 15
16
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 16 Profit and loss on disposal Investment allowances also affect cash flows ÙOne-off taxation deductions that businesses receive in the year of purchase of an asset
17
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 17 Investment in working capital Working capital ÙThe excess of current assets over current liabilities ÙOften increases as the result of higher balances in accounts receivable or inventory necessary to support a capital investment project ÙSuch increases are cash outflows and should be included in an analysis or cash flows
18
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 18
19
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 19 After-tax cash flows for other capital analysis techniques Pay back period ÙInitial investment/annual after-tax cash inflow Accounting rate of return ÙAverage annual profit after-tax from project/initial investment
20
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 20 Ranking investment projects Most firms have limited resources to invest in potentially profitable projects NPV and IRR may yield different ranking for alternative proposals ÙCannot always compare the NPV’s from different projects, as projects may not have the same life ÙIRR includes the reinvestment assumption
21
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 21
22
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 22 Ranking of investment projects Profitability index (or excess present value index) ÙAnother method for comparing investment proposals
23
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 23 Justifying investment in advanced technologies High technology projects may yield negative NPVs, even when managers know it will provide a competitive edge Difficult to quantify strategic impact of investments ÙRelevant benefits and costs arising from investing in advanced technologies ÙStrategic implications for such investments ÙIntangible benefits derived from the investment
24
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 24
25
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 25 Limitations of conventional capital expenditure analysis Use of unrealistic status quo ÙDo not assume that the current cash flow situation will be maintained if the project does not ahead ÙCompare the cash flows of the new proposal to the reduction in cash flows that will occur if the project does not go ahead Hurdle rates too high ÙTo encourage capital rationing or to hedge against uncertainty continued
26
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 26 Limitations of conventional capital expenditure analysis Time horizons too short ÙNeed to include benefits over all future years to prevent bias against unfavourable projects Difficulty in gaining approval for large projects ÙCreates incentive for manager to promote small incremental projects rather than requesting large technology projects continued
27
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 27 Limitations of conventional capital expenditure analysis Greater uncertainty about operating cash flows ÙThe complexities new software and hardware creates uncertainty ÙInexperience of using new technologies may creates difficulties in estimating cash flows continued
28
Copyright 2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, PPTs t/a Management Accounting: An Australian Perspective 3/e by Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton Slides prepared by Kim Langfield-Smith 28 Limitations of conventional capital expenditure analysis Exclusion of benefits that are difficult to quantify ÙSynergistic effects of adopting multiple capital expenditure proposals ÙGreater flexibility in the production process ÙShorter cycle times and reduced lead times ÙReduction of non-value-added costs
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.