Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Ken Wright Sensis Corporation January 28, 2010 Modeling and Simulation Challenges and the New Vehicle NRA.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Ken Wright Sensis Corporation January 28, 2010 Modeling and Simulation Challenges and the New Vehicle NRA."— Presentation transcript:

1 Ken Wright Sensis Corporation January 28, 2010 Modeling and Simulation Challenges and the New Vehicle NRA

2 2 Background Analyze the combined impacts of advanced vehicles and NextGen

3 3 Vehicles Cruise @ M 0.78, 35k – 40k ft 2000 nm Cruise @ M 1.6 41k ft to 53k ft 4000 nm 1200 nm Cruise @ M 0.5, 25k ft CESTOL SST LCTR UAS 750 nm 400 nm VLJ Cruise @ M 0.28, 15k ft Cruise @ M 0.6, 35k ft

4 4 Background (Continued) Timeframe –2025 –2040 (roughly 2 times today’s traffic levels) –3X (3 times today’s traffic levels) Tasks –Design vehicles –Develop usage scenarios –Compute delay –Compute environmental impacts –Compute metroplex impacts –Compute safety impacts –And much more

5 5 Model Infrastructure

6 6 The Focus of this Presentation is ACES To do NAS-wide simulation in ACES we need: BADA Data Schedules/Capacities ACES tracks used by AEDT to compute environmental impact

7 7 General Modeling Simulation Observations Designing good experiments is tough –Results often seem obvious –Difficult to translate concepts into hypotheses that leverage model strengths Difficult to spot erroneous results –Large datasets, complex interactive models –Figuring what’s going on below the surface is difficult Some modules don’t work well with large datasets –Results not significantly impacted –New features can increase run time, without affecting results –ACES 5.0 vs ACES 6.2 compatibility issues

8 Challenge: Demand Generation

9 9 JPDO-Provided Demand Sets

10 Huge delays at LAS and ATL due to capacity-demand imbalance dominate systemwide-results

11

12 12

13 13 ACES-Specific Observations MPAS (physics model) currently can’t fly unconventional vehicles –Cruise-Efficient STOL Aircraft (cruises too slow) –Supersonic transport (cruises too fast) –Tiltrotor (takes off like a helicopter) Tail-tracking Terminal area tracks Conflict Detection and Resolution Weather obstacles (Back-up)

14 14 Tail-Tracking One-third of all delay is propagated delay ACES tail-tracking doesn’t quite work

15 15 Sensis Itinerary-Creation Algorithm gives 5-6 Stages per Airframe

16 16 Increase in delay due to tail-tracking too small to be realistic

17 Aircraft is in two places at the same time 1 2 4 3

18 18 Short flights show discontinuous tracks Flights having great circle distance less than about 60 nm fly discontinuous “X” routes Affects 3,000 to 3,500 ACES flights in 2040 dataset (about 3.5% of total) Because flights fly longer routes than necessary, amount of time spent airborne is too long.

19 19

20 20

21 21

22 22 Flight from TEB to LGA is Airborne for 31 Minutes. Average speed = 21 mph

23 23 Conflict Detection and Resolution Not used in New Vehicle project Causes about as many conflicts as it resolves

24

25 CDR Causes Collision

26 26 CDR Causes Collision

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45 Aircraft sense impending 5-nm conflict CDR Causes Collision

46 Aircraft move to avoid 5-nm conflict CDR Causes Collision

47 Aircraft move to avoid 5-nm conflict CDR Causes Collision

48 Boom! CDR Causes Collision

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57 57 3X-Dataset No restrictions on international arrivals leads to large sectors exceeding capacity limits

58 2086

59 Foreign arrivals choke off domestic departures. (175k flights)

60 60 Conclusions Big project; tested lots of models; pushed limits of ACES and AEDT It’s probably more fun to be a developer than a user Coming up with interesting experiments is tough –Experiments should leverage model strengths to find novel results Difficult to spot erroneous results Some modules/capabilities did not work as expected for our large- scale experimental configuration

61 Ken Wright Sensis Corporation Questions?

62 Back up

63 63 Rerouting around Weather Mostly worked, but number of weather polygons scenario could use was unnecessarily limited Peculiar reroutes due to lack of airborne holding capability in ACES

64 64 Clusters of Storm Cells (>=50 DBZ) Replaced by Rectangles Clusters of Storm Cells (>=50 DBZ) Replaced by Rectangles

65 65 Clusters of Storm Cells (>=50 DBZ) Replaced by Rectangles Clusters of Storm Cells (>=50 DBZ) Replaced by Rectangles

66 66

67 67

68 68

69 69

70 70

71 71

72 72

73 73

74 74

75 75

76 76

77 77

78 78

79 79

80 80 Final fix blocked

81 81 Final fix blocked

82 82 Final fix blocked

83 83

84 84

85 85

86 86

87 87

88 88

89 89

90 90

91 91

92 92 It appears that the flight turns around only when it bounces off another weather cell

93 93

94 94

95 95

96 96

97 97

98 98

99 99

100 10 0


Download ppt "Ken Wright Sensis Corporation January 28, 2010 Modeling and Simulation Challenges and the New Vehicle NRA."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google