Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLydia Norton Modified over 9 years ago
1
Week 7 - Monday
2
What did we talk about last time? Sets
4
A man offers you a bet He shows you three cards One is red on both sides One is green on both sides One is red on one side and green on the other He will put one of the cards, at random, on the table If you can guess the color on the other side, you win If you bet $100 You gain $125 on a win You lose your $100 on a loss Should you take the bet? Why or why not?
6
We usually discuss sets within some superset U called the universe of discourse Assume that A and B are subsets of U The union of A and B, written A B is the set of all elements of U that are in either A or B The intersection of A and B, written A B is the set of all elements of U that are in A and B The difference of B minus A, written B – A, is the set of all elements of U that are in B and not in A The complement of A, written A c is the set of all elements of U that are not in A
7
Let U = {a, b, c, d, e, f, g} Let A = {a, c, e, g} Let B = {d, e, f, g} What are: A BA B A BA B B – A AcAc
8
There is a set with no elements in it called the empty set We can write the empty set { } or It comes up very often For example, {1, 3, 5} {2, 4, 6} = The empty set is a subset of every other set (including the empty set)
9
Two sets A and B are considered disjoint if A B = Sets A 1, A 2, … A n are mutually disjoint (or nonoverlapping) if A i A j = for all i j A collection of nonempty sets {A 1, A 2, … A n } is a partition of set A iff: 1. A = A 1 A 2 … A n 2. A 1, A 2, … A n are mutually disjoint
10
Given a set A, the power set of A, written P (A) or 2 A is the set of all subsets of A Example: B = {1, 3, 6} P (B) = { , {1}, {3}, {6}, {1,3}, {1,6}, {3,6}, {1,3,6}} Let n be the number of elements in A, called the cardinality of A Then, the cardinality of P (A) is 2 n
11
An ordered n-tuple (x 1, x 2, … x n ) is an ordered sequence of n elements, not necessarily from the same set The Cartesian product of sets A and B, written A x B is the set of all ordered 2-tuples of the form (a, b), a A, b B Thus, (x, y) points are elements of the Cartesian product R x R (sometimes written R 2 )
13
Inclusion of Intersection: For all sets A and B A B AA B A A B BA B B Inclusion in Union: For all sets A and B A A B B A B Transitive Property of Subsets: If A B and B C, then A C
14
The basic way to prove that X is a subset of Y 1. Suppose that x is a particular but arbitrarily chosen element of X 2. Show that x is an element of Y If every element in X must be in Y, by definition, X is a subset of Y
15
We want to leverage the techniques we've already used in logic and proofs The following definitions help with this goal: 1. x X Y x X x Y 2. x X Y x X x Y 3. x X – Y x X x Y 4. x X c x X 5. (x, y) X Y x X y Y
16
Theorem: For all sets A and B, A B A Proof: Let x be some element in A B x A x B x A Thus, all elements in A B are in A A B AA B A QED Premise Definition of intersection Specialization By generalization Definition of subset
17
NameLawDual Commutative A B = B AA B = B A Associative (A B) C = A (B C)(A B) C = A (B C) Distributive A (B C) = (A B) (A C)A (B C) = (A B) (A C) Identity A = AA U = A Complement A A c = UA A c = Double Complement(A c ) c = A Idempotent A A = AA A = A Universal Bound A U = UA = De Morgan’s (A B) c = A c B c (A B) c = A c B c Absorption A (A B) = AA (A B) = A Complements of U and U c = c = U Set Difference A – B = A B c
18
To prove that X = Y Prove that X Y and Prove that Y X
19
Theorem: For all sets A,B, and C, A (B C) = (A B) (A C) Proof: Let x be some element in A (B C) x A x (B C) Case 1: Let x A x A x B x A B x A x C x A C x A B x A C x (A B) (A C) Case 2: Let x B C x B x C x B x A x B x A B x C x A x C x A C x A B x A C x (A B) (A C) In all possible cases, x (A B) (A C), thus A (B C) (A B) (A C)
20
Let x be some element in (A B) (A C) x (A B) x (A C)x (A B) x (A C) Case 1: Let x A x A x B C x A (B C) Case 2: Let x A x A Bx A B x A x B x B x A C x A x C x C x B x C x B C x A x B C x A (B C) In all possible cases, x A (B C), thus (A B) (A C) A (B C) Since both A (B C) (A B) (A C) and (A B) (A C) A (B C), A (B C) = (A B) (A C) QED
21
Prove that, for any set A, A = Hint: Use a proof by contradiction
23
Like any disproof for a universal statement, you must find a counterexample to disprove a set property For set properties, the counterexample must be a specific examples of sets for each set in the claim
24
Claim: For all sets A, B, and C, (A – B) (B – C) = A – C Find a counterexample
25
We can use the laws of set identities given before to prove a statement of set theory Be extremely careful (even more careful than with propositional logic) to use the law exactly as stated
26
Theorem: A – (A B) = A – B Proof: A – (A B) = A (A B) c = A (A c B c ) = (A A c ) (A B c ) = (A B c ) = A B c = A – B QED
27
For all sets A, B, and C, if A B and B C, then A C
28
For all sets A and B, ((A c B c ) – A) c = A
30
Set theory is a slippery slope We are able to talk about very abstract concepts { x Z | x is prime } This is a well-defined set, even though there are an infinite number of primes and we don't know how to find the n th prime number Without some careful rules, we can begin to define sets that are not well-defined
31
Let a barber be the man in Elizabethtown who shaves the men in Elizabethtown if and only if they don't shave themselves. Let T be the set of all men in Elizabethtown Let B(x) be "x is a barber" Let S(x,y) be "x shaves y" b T m T (B(b) (S(b,m) ~S(m,m))) But, who shaves the barber?
32
Bertrand Russell invented the Barber Paradox to explain to normal people a problem he had found in set theory Most sets are not elements of themselves So, it seems reasonable to create a set S that is the set of all sets that are not elements of themselves More formally, S = { A | A is a set and A A } But, is S an element of itself?
33
How do we make sure that this paradox cannot happen in set theory? We can make rules about what sets we allow in or not The rule that we use in class is that all sets must be subsets of a defined universe U Higher level set theory has a number of different frameworks for defining a useful universe
35
It turns out that the idea behind Russell's Paradox actually has practical implications It wasn't new, either Cantor had previously used a diagonal argument to show that there are more real numbers than rational numbers But, unexpectedly, Turing found an application of this idea for computing
36
A Turing machine is a mathematical model for computation It consists of a head, an infinitely long tape, a set of possible states, and an alphabet of characters that can be written on the tape A list of rules saying what it should write and should it move left or right given the current symbol and state 1011110000 A A
37
If an algorithm exists, a Turing machine can perform that algorithm In essence, a Turing machine is the most powerful model we have of computation Power, in this sense, means the ability to compute some function, not the speed associated with its computation
38
Given a Turing machine and input x, does it reach the halt state? First, recognize that we can encode a Turing machine as input for another Turing machine We just have to design a system to describe the rules, the states, etc. We want to design a Turing machine that can read another
39
Imagine we have a Turing machine H(m,x) that takes the description of another Turing machine m and its input x and returns 1 if m halts on input x and 0 otherwise Now, construct a machine H’(m,x) that runs H(m,x), but, if H(m,x) gives 1, then H’(m,x) infinitely loops, and, if H(m,x) gives 0, then then H’(m,x) returns 1 Let’s say that d is the description of H’(m,x) What happens when you run H’(d,d)?
40
Clearly, a Turing machine that solves the halting problem doesn’t exist Essentially, the problem of deciding if a problem is computable is itself uncomputable Therefore, there are some problems (called undecidable) for which there is no algorithm Not an algorithm that will take a long time, but no algorithm If we find such a problem, we are stuck …unless someone can invent a more powerful model of computation
41
Gödel used diagonalization again to prove that it is impossible to create a consistent set of axioms that can prove everything about the set of natural numbers As a consequence, you can create a system that is complete but not consistent Or, you can create a system that is consistent but not complete Either way, there are principles in math in general that are true but impossible to prove, at least with any given system You might as well give up on math now
43
A function f from set X to set Y is a relation between elements of X (inputs) and elements of Y (outputs) such that each input is related to exactly one output We write f: X Y to indicate this X is called the domain of f Y is called the co-domain of f The range of f is { y Y | y = f(x), for some x X} The inverse image of y is { x X | f(x) = y }
44
Using standard assumptions, consider f(x) = x 2 What is the domain? What is the co-domain? What is the range? What is f(3.2)? What is the inverse image of 4? Assume that the set of positive integers is the domain and co-domain What is the range? What is f(3.2)? What is the inverse image of 4?
45
With finite domains and co-domains, we can define a function using an arrow diagram What is the domain? What is the co-domain? What are f(a), f(b), and f(c)? What is the range? What are the inverse images of 1, 2, 3, and 4? Represent f as a set of ordered pairs abcabc abcabc 12341234 12341234 XYf
46
Which of the following are functions from X to Y? abcabc abcabc 12341234 12341234 XYf abcabc abcabc 12341234 12341234 XYg abcabc abcabc 12341234 12341234 XYh
47
Given two functions f and g from X to Y, f equals g, written f = g, iff: f(x) = g(x) for all x X Let f(x) = |x| and g(x) = Does f = g? Let f(x) = x and g(x) = 1/(1/x) Does f = g?
48
Functions can be defined from any well- defined set to any other There is an identity function from any set to itself We can represent a sequence as a function from a range of integers to the values of the sequence We can create a function mapping from sets to integers, for example, giving the cardinality of certain sets
49
You should know this already But, this is the official place where it should be covered formally There is a function called the logarithm with base b of x defined from R + to R as follows: log b x = y b y = x
50
For a function of multiple values, we can define its domain to be the Cartesian product of sets Let S n be strings of 1's and 0's of length n An important CS concept is Hamming distance Hamming distance takes two binary strings of length n and gives the number of places where they differ Let Hamming distance be H: S n x S n Z nonneg What is H(00101, 01110)? What is H(10001, 01111)?
51
There are two ways in which a function can be poorly defined It does not provide a mapping for every value in the domain Example: f: R R such that f(x) = 1/x It provides more than one mapping for some value in the domain Example: f: Q Z such that f(m/n) = m, where m and n are the integers representing the rational number
52
Let F be a function from X to Y F is one-to-one (or injective) if and only if: If F(x 1 ) = F(x 2 ) then x 1 = x 2 Is f(x) = x 2 from Z to Z one-to-one? Is f(x) = x 2 from Z + to Z one-to-one? Is h(x) one-to-one? abcabc abcabc 12341234 12341234 XYh
53
To prove that f from X to Y is one-to-one, prove that x 1, x 2 X, f(x 1 ) = f(x 2 ) x 1 = x 2 To disprove, just find a counter example Prove that f: R R defined by f(x) = 4x – 1 is one-to-one Prove that g: Z Z defined by g(n) = n 2 is not one-to-one
54
Let F be a function from X to Y F is onto (or surjective) if and only if: y Y, x X such that F(x) = y Is f(x) = x 2 from Z to Z onto? Is f(x) = x 2 from R + to R + onto? Is h(x) onto? abcabc abcabc 123123 123123 XYh
55
If a function F: X Y is both one-to-one and onto (bijective), then there is an inverse function F -1 : Y X such that: F -1 (y) = x F(x) = y, for all x X and y Y
57
More on functions Composition of functions Cardinality
58
Homework 4 is due tonight! Read Chapter 7
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.