Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Keyser and Shapiro (1986) Keyser, D. and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Keyser and Shapiro (1986) Keyser, D. and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Keyser and Shapiro (1986) Keyser, D. and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114, 452–499.

2 s n Time = t T T-  T- 2  T T- 3  T T- 4  T T- 5  T T- 6  T T- 7  T T- 8  T s n Time = t +  t T T-  T- 2  T T- 3  T T- 4  T T- 5  T T- 6  T T- 7  T T- 8  T Fronts exist in a kinematic sense due to deformation in the presence of a thermal gradient and tilting of vertical thermal gradients    Before n z    After n z

3 Absolute vorticity is generated along parcel trajectories by horizontal convergence and tilting of vertical shear. CONVERGENCE

4 Early models of the structure of upper level fronts 1937 1949 19521959 Bjerknes and Palmen (1937) Palmen and Nagler (1949) Berggren (1952) Reed and Danielson (1959) Fig. 1 Note different conceptual ideas of the interface of the front with the stratosphere

5 Temperature Pot. Temp. Note folded tropopause Front envisioned to separate polar and tropical air at all altitudes – stratosphere distinct from front, and isolated from troposphere except for diffusion -- Vertical extension of surface front Fig. 2 Bjerknes and Palmen (1937)

6 Geostrophic wind normal to cross section, temperature Cross section normal to front on 5 Feb 1947 Folded tropopause is replaced by a “break region” separating the tropospheric frontal layer and the tropopause over the tropical and polar air Palmen and Nagler (1949) Front is a zone of concentrated cyclonic and vertical shear Jet over frontal zone Fig. 3

7 Berggren (1952) Potential temperature and observed wind speed Cross section normal to front on 9 Nov 1949 Tropospheric frontal zone is extended into the stratosphere Frontal zone defined by strong cyclonic wind shear Fig. 4

8 Reed and Danielson (1959) Geostrophic wind normal to cross section Temperature Potential Vorticity Potential Temperature Tropopause on polar side joined to base of frontal zone Tropopause on tropical side joined to top of frontal zone Frontal zone region of: High potential vorticity (stratospheric intrusion of air) Strong cyclonic and vertical shear Sharp temperature and potential temperature gradient Isentropes approximately parallel to frontal surface Fig. 5 Stratospheric air

9 Difference in thinking: NEW: Upper tropospheric fronts: Separate stratospheric and tropospheric air Form as a result of tilting of the horizontal temperature gradient and vorticity OLD: Upper tropospheric fronts Separate tropical and polar air Form as a result of confluence between polar and tropical airmasses In this view: Upper and lower tropospheric fronts can arise independently Upper tropospheric fronts do not have to extend to the surface

10 Absolute Geostrophic Momentum u g = along front (x) component of geostrophic wind f = Coriolis parameter y = cross front coordinate, positive toward colder air Relationship of to 3-D absolute geostrophic vorticity vector into screen (along front) m1m1 m2m2 Frontal zone If there are no along front variations and the front is straight Vertical component of vorticity Horizontal component of vorticity Recent advances in our understanding of upper level fronts

11 11 22 33 44 55 y m1m1 m2m2 m3m3 m4m4 m5m5 x p Barotropic Atmosphere (no temperature gradient) m surfaces and  surfaces in a barotropic and baroclinic environment 11 22 33 44 55 y m1m1 m2m2 m3m3 m4m4 m5m5 x p Baroclinic Atmosphere (temperature gradient) Because of temperature gradient geostrophic wind increases with height And m surfaces tilt since m = u g - fy m only a function of f along y direction Relationship of to potential temperature where

12 Pot. Temp and wind speed Potential Vorticity Absolute Angular MomentumAbsolute Angular Momentum/Pot Temp Tropopause And fronts Cyclonic Shear Boundary Extremely high resolution measurements of frontal structure made with a research aircraft supplemented by sondes (Shapiro 1981)

13 In pressure coordinates, potential vorticity takes the following form: Potential vorticity is: Large and positive (stable stratospheric air) where the area of the boxes formed by the intersection of m and  lines is small Small and positive (stable tropospheric air) where the area of the boxes is large Negative (either inertially, convectively, and/or symmetrically unstable) when the slope of the  lines exceeds the slope of the m lines

14 For adiabatic processes (no friction, no diabatic heating, no mixing) potential vorticity is conserved. Question: Where does the high values of potential vorticity at the inflection point come from? Clear air turbulence (CAT): The shear zones associated with fronts are zones of extreme CAT CAT mixes warm air downward above the level of maximum winds and cold air upward below the level of maximum winds CAT limits frontal scale collapse to about 100 km Warming rates due to vertical flux of heat

15 Upper level frontal zones, potential vorticity anomalies and ozone concentrations Potential temperature and winds Potential vorticity Ozone Ozone is a tracer on the time scale of frontogenesis. Ozone from the stratosphere can intrude all the way to the ground within frontal zones in exceptionally strong fronts! CAT and Tropospheric-Stratospheric exchange: Chloroflorocarbons go up and radioactivity from the 1950s nuclear bomb tests comes down!

16 Consider a jetstreak propagating around and through the base of a trough: Baroclinic instability- wave amplifying Warm advection Cold Advection Baroclinic wave maximum intensity Cold Advection Baroclinic wave weakening What is the impact of cold and warm advection on the ageostrophic circulation about the front and upper level frontogenesis?

17 We will first look at numerical simulations for a) a straight jet with confluence only b) a straight jet dominated by warm advection aloft c) a straight jet dominated by cold advection aloft Then look at theory for these situations and expected patterns of vertical motion Then look at observations to see how these predictions hold up Then add in the effect of flow curvature Procedure: (Note: Paper does this in the opposite way (observation, theory, simulation), but it is more difficult to understand

18 Y (km) Y axis Pure confluence acting on  gradient Shear acting on  gradient Winds stronger on right leading To dominance of cold advection Shear acting on  gradient Winds stronger on left leading To dominance of warm advection Model is 2-D, but the assumed flow that is the basis for the 2D simulation is shown here for the 438 mb level

19 Symmetric direct circulation about the front with warm air rising and cold air sinking. Westerly jet on warm side, easterly at low levels on cold side. Air parcels converge and descend in frontal zone  and cross front geostrophic wind 0 hr 48 hr  and along front geostrophic wind  and ageostrophic circulation 24 hr 48 hr  and 48 hr trajectories

20 Direct circulation displaced toward cold air so that warm air rising along part of frontal zone. Westerly jet on warm side, easterly at low levels on cold side. Shear zone more defined. Air parcels descend in frontal zone on cold side, ascend on warm side.  and cross front geostrophic wind 0 hr 48 hr  and along front geostrophic wind  and ageostrophic circulation 24 hr 48 hr  and 48 hr trajectories

21 Direct circulation displaced toward warm air so that warm air sinks into frontal zone This leads to a frontal split, with the upper level front distinct from the lower level front.  and cross front geostrophic wind 0 hr 48 hr  and along front geostrophic wind  and ageostrophic circulation 24 hr 48 hr  and 48 hr trajectories

22 Note that the model solutions we just examined are all for confluent flow. Therefore, they apply to a jetstreak’s entrance region. The opposite patterns will apply in a jetstreak’s exit region

23 The theory used to diagnose the circulation about fronts derives from the semi-geostrophic system of equations Assume: We have an east-west front The change in the Coriolis parameter across the frontal zone can be ignored (f = constant) The geostrophic wind in the x direction (along front) >> that the ageostrophic wind along front (u g >> u ag ). In this case, the total derivative in pressure coordinates can be expressed as

24 The u momentum equation using absolute momentum: Note that: X XX Add this equation to the u Momentum equation to get: The thermodynamic equation: the rate of change of potential temperature following a parcel equals the diabatic heating rate. The u momentum equation Geostrophic wind relationships Continuity equation Governing equations applying geostrophic momentum approximation

25 u momentum equation thermodynamic equationcontinuity equation Note also that we can define a streamfunction  such that and we will satisfy the continuity equation. With this system of equations we seek a solution for the cross frontal circulation. To derive this, we must develop prognostic equations for the: In the interest of time, I will derive the absolute vorticity and leave the other derivations to you….. Absolute vorticity The components of the cross frontal thermal wind balance The static stability

26 Expand d/dt operator Take y derivative Consolidate terms that compose d/dt (  m/  y) Momentum equation Substitute momentum equation and rearrange Substitute geostrophic wind to eliminate 

27 Expand first term on RHS and use m=u g -fy Rearrange and cancel terms that add up to zero Write individual terms XX Write remaining terms in terms of m Substitute for  v ag /  y from continuity eqn

28 Vorticity Equation Other equations I will not derive: Components in Thermal wind eqn Static stability Changes in static stability and vorticity depend on the ageostrophic circulation To maintain thermal wind balance, the terms on the left hand side of each of the two lower equations must be equal. We can subtract equations to get…

29 Now use the definition of the streamfunction to reduce this to a single equation in one unknown The equation above was originally derived by Sawyer (1956) for the special case of no along front variations in potential temperature, and modified by Eliassen (1962) to the form above. The equation is therefore called the “Sawyer-Eliassen Equation”

30 Right side of equation represent the forcing (known from measurements or in model solution) Static stabilityBaroclinicity (thermal wind) Inertial stability Geostrophic deformationFrictionDiabatic heating , the streamfunction, is the response Solutions for  can be obtained provided lateral and top/bottom boundary conditions are specified and the potential vorticity is positive in the domain (air is inertially, convectively and symmetrically [slantwise] stable).

31 Nature of the solution of the Sawyer-Eliassen Equation: A direct circulation (warm air rising and cold air sinking) will result with positive forcing. An indirect circulation (warm air sinking and cold air rising) will result with negative forcing. Cold air Warm air Isentrope Cold air Warm air Isentrope

32 Dynamics of frontogenesis On the figure on the left, Dashed lines: potential temperature Blue lines: pressure surfaces (exaggerated) Shading: isotachs (blue into screen, red out) A conceptual model of the ageostrophic circulation caused by frontogenesis Geostrophically-balanced weak front 2. Impulsively intensify front Stronger temperature gradient leads to more steeply sloped pressure surfaces and an increase in the pressure gradient force at both high and low levels 1. Initial condition

33 Dynamics of frontogenesis A conceptual model of the ageostrophic circulation caused by frontogenesis 2. Impulsively intensify front Stronger temperature gradient leads to more steeply sloped pressure surfaces and an increase in the pressure gradient force at both high and low levels 3. Air accelerates Air rises on warm side Air descends on cold side Air accelerates along isentropes toward cold air and into screen aloft Air accelerates toward warm air and out of screen in low levels

34 Dynamics of frontogenesis A conceptual model of the ageostrophic circulation caused by frontogenesis 3. Air accelerates Air rises on warm side Air descends on cold side Air accelerates toward cold air and into screen aloft Air accelerates toward warm air and out of screen in low levels Air cools at moist Adiabatic lapse rate Air warms at dry Adiabatic lapse rate 4. Balance is restored - Air rises and cools on warm side - Air sinks and warms on cold side - counteracts effects of frontogenesis -Wind speed in upper jet increases (into screen) -Wind speed in lower jet increases (out of screen) - Coriolis force increases - Geostrophic balance restored

35 The circulation describe in the last few slides can be seen clearly on the front illustrated on the cross section below

36 In the absence of diabatic heating and friction, the forcing for the SW circulation can be expressed as Using the thermal wind relationship And the expression for the non- divergence of the geostrophic wind This expression can be written: Consider a jetstreak where =0 In the entrance quadrant u g increases with x while  decreases with y. DIRECT CIRCULATION INDIRECT CIRCULATION In the exit quadrant u g decreases with x while  decreases with y.

37 In the absence of diabatic heating and friction, the forcing for the SW circulation can be expressed as Using the thermal wind relationship And the expression for the non- divergence of the geostrophic wind This expression can be written: Consider a shear zone along a temperature gradient where =0 u g decreases with y while  increases with x. INDIRECT CIRCULATION Cold advection pattern corresponds to an indirect circulation Warm advection pattern corresponds to an direct circulation Correspondingly:

38 Example of solution of the Sawyer-Eliassen equation The circulation about an ideal frontal zone characterized by Confluence (top) Shear (bottom) Streamlines of ageostrophic circulation (thick solid lines) Isotachs of u g (denoted U) (dashed lines) Isotachs fo v g (denoted V) (thin solid lines)

39 IMPACT OF THERMAL ADVECTION ON JETSTREAKS In the following diagrams: (+) means positive  (downward motion) (-) means negative  (upward motion) Circulation is direct if upward motion (-) is south of downward motion (+) since cold air lies to north Jetstreak with no temperature gradient along jet axis: direct circulation in entrance, indirect in exit, symmetric around the axis of the jetstreak Jetstreak with temperature gradient along jet axis: cold air advection maximum along jet axis. Air descends along jet axis creating two direct circulations, one on either side of of jet. rarely occurs!

40 IMPACT OF THERMAL ADVECTION ON JETSTREAKS In the following diagrams: (+) means positive  (downward motion) (-) means negative  (upward motion) Circulation is direct if upward motion (-) is south of downward motion (+) since cold air lies to north Jetstreak with cold advection: direct circulation in entrance shifted to south side of jetstreak axis, indirect circulation shifted to north side of jetstreak axis. Common when jetstreak is on west side of trough Common when jetstreak is on east side of trough Jetstreak with warm advection: direct circulation in entrance shifted to north side of jetstreak axis, indirect circulation shifted to south side of jetstreak axis.

41

42 Schematic illustration of tropopause folding and the development of an upper level frontal zone Corresponding example in the real world Warm air Direct Cell Indirect Cell Cold air Active mixing and exchange layer

43 The complete description of a jetstreak passing through a baroclinic wave must also include the effects of flow curvature Curvature shifts the direct circulation in jet entrance region toward north side of jet axis Curvature shifts the indirect circulation in jet exit region toward north side of jet axis

44 Relationship of upper level fronts to evolving baroclinic waves 1000 mb height, 500 mb height, surface front Stippling: precipitation Cross hatching: 500 mb frontal zone Lines: cross sections on next figures Front distinctFront diffuseFronts distinct Front distinctFront diffuse ON CROSS SECTION

45 On the previous panel: Jestreak propagates from W side of trough to E side Frontal structure on corresponding cross sections is distinct on W side, then both sides, then E side – upper level frontogenesis is tied to the secondary circulations about the jet Strong jet Sharp front Tilting dominant Frotogenetic process Frontal zone advected around trough and enhanced by confluence


Download ppt "Keyser and Shapiro (1986) Keyser, D. and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google