1. James Bearman AJ Brinker Dean Bryson Brian Gershkoff Kuo Guo Joseph Henrich Aaron Smith

2.  Overview  Business Case  Customer Needs  State of the Market: 2058  Competition  Potential Missions  Requirement Development  Benchmarking Data  Conclusion 2

3.  DC-3, Historical Perspective  Range  Capacity  Reliability  Success of the DC-3  Business Model  Captured a large Market Share  Technology expanded borders of flight 3

4.  Provide a versatile aircraft with medium range and capacity to meet the needs of a commercial aircraft market still expanding in the year 2058  Incorporate the latest in technology to provide reliability, efficiency, while fulfilling the need for an environmentally friendly transportation system  Possess the ability to operate at nearly any airfield 4

5.  Airlines  Short Runway Capability ▪ Hub and Spoke System ▪ Evolution of Flight Routes  Moderate Passenger Capacity ▪ Lower Cost than Jumbo Jets ▪ Promotes Full Flights  Appropriate Range ▪ Versatility in Flight Routes ▪ Cross-Continental not Required 5

6.  Charters  Small Airport Capability ▪ Demand to avoid hubs ▪ Increase speed of travel  Generous amount of Passengers and Cargo ▪ Enough space to carry an entire travel party in one plane ▪ Extra Space = Extra Cost 6

7.  Passenger Capacity  Large enough for medium-medium high demand travel routes  Small enough for chartered flights  Range  Long enough to fulfill most passenger needs  Shorter range reduces overall aircraft cost  Short Runway Capability allows flexibility in flight routings for all customers 7

8. Chart From Embraer 8

9.  Immediate (2008) demand for medium capacity aircraft  28,600 aircraft delivered in the next 20 years (Boeing)  56,000 aircraft delivered in the next 50 years  Majority of aircraft will be regional jet or single aisle  Our Aircraft  Fills gap between Regional and Single-Aisle  ESTOL capability  Generous Range  Expect to capture ~15% of market (8,500 aircraft) 9

10.  Science Fiction  Digital Communication  Other Transportation  Other Aircraft 10

11.  The Obvious  Transporters  Warp Drive  Jet Packs  Improbabilities  Flying Cars  Space Planes  Mag-Lev Cars 11

12.  What it can do  Communicate information over great distances  Give the illusion of people worldwide being in the same room  Be scheduled easily and activated quickly  Useful for meetings  What it can’t do  Provide perfect interaction  Compensate for time zones  Will not replace business travel, even on a global scale 12

13.  Automobiles  Alternative Energy Sources  Artificial Intelligence Vehicle Control  Faster Driving Speeds  Cannot achieve Aircraft Speeds, Safety, or Range  Rail  Higher Speeds  Low Environmental Impact  Excellent over Short Ranges  Cannot cross larger bodies of water  Speeds still too low over longer ranges  Infrastructure expansion slow and costly 13

14.  Bombardier  C-Series  CRJ Family  Embraer  Competition to C-Series  ERJ Family  E-Jet Family  Boeing  737 Family  New Aircraft Family  Airbus  A320 Family  New Aircraft Family  Cessna, Learjet, Gulfstream 14

15. Taxi Takeoff & Climb Step Cruise For Best Range Descend & Hold Land & Taxi Climb- Miss Approach Cruise Descend & Hold Land & Taxi  Schaumburg to North Las Vegas (1300 nmi)  Scheduled Commercial Route  Large City (Chicago) to Large City (Las Vegas)  Utilize Small/Regional Airport  South Bend to Burbank (1580 nmi)  Chartered Route (Notre Dame vs USC)  Maximize Convenience 15

16. Taxi TO & Climb Step Cruise For Best Range Descend & Hold Land & Taxi Climb- Miss Approach Cruise Descend & Hold Land & Taxi Cruise TO & Climb  Purdue University to University of Illinois to Cancun  Total Distance: 1200 nmi  Spring Break Charter  Small Cities to Major Tourist Destination Descend Land & Taxi 16

17.  Minneapolis to Los Angeles  Range: 1330 nmi  Hub to Hub  Connecting Flight in LAX  Landing on half of the runway Taxi Takeoff & Climb Step Cruise For Best Range Land & Taxi Climb- Miss Approach Cruise Descend & Hold Land & Taxi Spiral Descent 17

18.  House of Quality  “What’s”-Needs of the Customer  “How’s”-Requirements to meet the needs  Benchmarking  Historical Database Created  Used to develop performance estimates 18

19.  Customer Needs  Short Runway  Medium Range  Fast Cruise  Small Airport Capable  Comfortable to Passengers  Medium Passenger Capacity 19

20. Engineering Requirement ConditionTargetThreshold Takeoff Distance ≤ 2,500 ft3,500 ft Landing Distance ≤ 2,500 ft3,500 ft Takeoff Weight ≤ 80,000 lb100,000 lb Range ≥ 1800 nm1500 nm Maximum Cruise Speed ≥ 0.85 M0.8 M Maximum Passenger Capacity ≥ 11090 20

21.  Current aircraft used in benchmarking: (circa 2008)  Boeing 737-family  Airbus A320-family  Embraer ▪ ERJ-family ▪ E-Series  Canadair ▪ CRJ-family ▪ C-series  All data obtained from manufacturers’ websites and Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft 21

22. 22 before tech weight savings after tech weight savings

23. 23 before tech weight savings after tech weight savings

24. 24 before tech weight savings after tech weight savings

25.  Composites  Active Aeroelastic Wings  Morphing Winglets  Energy Harvesting  Magnetic Bearings  Continuous Mold Line Control Systems  Thrust Vectoring  Blown Flaps  GPS Precision Approaches  Unducted Fans  Artificial Intelligence Navigation 25

26.  Medium Range, Medium Capacity Aircraft  Reasonable Targets for all Engineering Parameters  Versatile Mission Profile  Realistic Estimation of Future Market  Potential to become extremely popular, very widely used aircraft 26

27.  Begin Cost Estimations  Additional Sizing Analysis  Initial Design Choices  Fuselage Layout  Aerodynamic Variables  Engine Choice  Continue Advanced Technology Research 27