1. Public hearing on GOVSA Discussion Paper on climate change convened by Portfolio Committee on Environmental Affairs Hilton Trollip, Senior Researcher Energy, Environment & Climate Change Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town 22 nd September, 2015, Parliament

2. Intended Nationally Determined Contribution INDC ERC will focus on the mitigation component of the INDC - This means how South Africa intends to limit it’s greenhouse gas emissions Contents Role of University of Cape Town - Energy Research Centre (ERC) What is South Africa’s position on mitigation –What is accepted/established ? –Why should we care ? How should the INDC support South African position ? –Engagement in UNFCCC processes –Technical attributes of a mitigation INDC How does the mitigation INDC support the South African position ? –International assessment –National assessment Mitigation is achievable while achieving socio-economic goals Low carbon development is also good for improving air/water quality, quality of life Conclusions

3. Role of University of Cape Town - Energy Research Centre (ERC) ERC is South African and African-based and oriented multi-disciplinary pursues excellence in technology, policy and sustainable development research, education and capacity building programmes at a local and international level  provide evidence for policy makers  independent – without fear or favour  transparent, peer-reviewed, open, …

4. What is South Africa’s position on mitigation What is accepted/established ? **from South Africa draft position document “South Africa as a global responsible citizen is committed to making a fair contribution to addressing the challenge of climate change based on science and equity “…to ensure that global emission reduction efforts are adequate to avert dangerous climate change –while respecting developing countries’ priorities for development and eradicating poverty “effective (be based on sound science) “adequate (to keep temperature increase below 2°C)

5. How should the INDC support South African position ? Engagement in UNFCCC processes South Africa demonstrated leadership at COP15 with the Copenhagen PPD pledge Ditto at COP17- Durban –The Paris COP21 will be implementing the agreement made in Durban SA is the G77 Chair South Africa is responsible for negotiating and speaking on behalf of two-thirds of the UN membership on key development issues - the G77 is the largest coalition of developing countries in the UN. It provides the means for countries to promote collective economic interests and enhance negotiating capacity on major economic and development issues.

6. What is South Africa’s position on mitigation **What is accepted/established ? **from South Africa draft position document ** “South Africa calls for enhancement of mitigation ambition, in accordance with the provisions and principles of the Convention with a view to achieving the 1.5*** or 2 degree Celsius target **from South Africa draft position document ***position of African Group of negotiators, endorsed by African Ministers

7. What is South Africa’s position on mitigation Why should we care ?  If inadequately addressed Climate Change will have severe consequences for Africa and South Africa –To avert this requires every country has to play its part, and involves considerable challenges South Africa has played a leadership role up until now –Constructive: GOVSA is acting in a way that is commensurate with the outcomes we want and need If GOVSA DOES not act appropriately and effectively we increase risks of severe consequences –From climate change –From benefits of membership of international community

8. How should the INDC support South African position ? Technical attributes of a mitigation INDC Clear In good faith** Show how it supports South African position –To achieve global 2 o C ( and/or 1.5 o C ) Fair contribution –To achieve local implementation Adequate evidence and analysis Support previous commitments and show development and ‘homework’ relevant to UNFCCC developments  There is no doubt South Africa has the necessary capacity for the above. The question is how it chooses to deploy this capacity ? **can’t say one thing and be known and seen to be supporting and doing another

9. Australia Canada Chile Japan New Zealand Russian Federation Singapore South Africa South Korea Ukraine Brazil China EU India Indonesia Kazakhsta n Mexico Norway Peru Switzerlan d USA Costa Rica Ethiopia Morocco Bhutan Role Model Inadequate Sufficient Medium Role Model: More than consistent with below 2°C limit Sufficient: Fully consistent with below 2°C limit Medium: Not consistent with limiting warming below 2°C as it would require many other countries to make a comparably greater effort and much deeper reductions Inadequate: If all governments put forward inadequate positions warming likely to exceed 3 – 4 °C Climate Action Tracker IS SA MITIGATION INDC FAIR? How does the mitigation INDC support the South African position ? - International assessment of ambition level

10. Inadequate Medium Sufficient Role Model Climate Action Tracker

11. Is SA’s contribution a fair share? Climate Equity Reference Calculator: http://calculator.climateequityreference.org

12. IS THE South African MITIGATION INDC POSSIBLE ? 14 Gt line added in blue – output of DDPP result: energy plus Green line – with AFOLU, waste, Iron & Steel Industrial Process emissions

13. Assessment of 14Gt energy emissions Linked full-sector economic CGE model with full-sector energy optimization model –Documented –Transparent –Open http://deepdecarbonization.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/09/DDPP_ZAF.pdf DDPP consists of research teams from 16 countries representing 74% of current global GHG emissions: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, United Kingdom, and United States. The teams consist of scholars from leading research institutions in their respective countries, who are acting independently.

14. DDPP combined results

15. Strong growth projected Value-added to GDP for major sectors in 2010, 2030, and 2050

16. Core of the economy remains strong Industry value add to GDP by industrial subsector

17. Unemployment reduced Unemployment rate over time GDP/capita increases 170% Population in low-income bracket decreases from 50% to 18% by 2050 Unemployment decreases from 25% to 12%/18%

18. Decarbonising electricity is KEY !

19. How does the mitigation INDC support the South African position ? - National assessment of ambition level Further points Existing official/public statistics** are: –Inadequate – the Inventory is necessary but cannot be a basis for what is now required for mitigation analysis, implementation and monitoring –Not up to date –A sticking point that needs urgent attention Government policies are not aligned –Each Ministry/department appears to have a different often contradictory policy **Official statistics, not data held confidential by emitters

20. Conclusions Linked energy-system/economy modeling and detailed research shows PPD range is achievable while also achieving socio-economic goals South Africa needs to improve statistics Alignment of government departments/efforts –Climate change involves much, much more than environmental policy Process of open debate, informed by high quality evidence and analysis is required to deepen and extend the evidence-based policy making process –To ensure balancing interests

21. Example of renewable energy electricity in SA

22. Thank you !

23. How should the INDC support South African position ? Some possible mitigation INDCs and outcomes 1.INDC FAIR and ALIGNED to 2 0 C/1.5 0 C …And international success  FIRST PRIZE, what we are working for 2.INDC NOT FAIR and ALIGNED to 2 0 C/1.5 0 C  undermines negotiations and increases risks of all climate change risks, plus… If South Africa tries to be a free-rider  Steady loss of benefits of international community Trade, investment, … Other lost opportunities 3.INDC FAIR and ALIGNED to 2 0 C/1.5 0 C …But international failure  our mitigation INDC is flexible, consistent with multi-lateral negotiations process  ( we make sure we address adaptation ) 4.INDC INDC is late, reluctant, vague, conflicted, … ( and does little …late ) –Incoherent policy –Stranded assets, Dead-end development path, Lost opportunities, Much more costly to act later –Many mitigation options carry significant benefits