1. Resolution #2 feedback to RPF Alex Weideman Holcim (South Africa) (Pty)Ltd Aggregate, Gauteng alex.weideman@holcim.com Picture of topic

2. 2 17.11.2015/PZ Resolution feedback to RPF RPF – May 2006 Table of contents 1. Resolution #2 2. Background 3. Meeting attendance 4. Outcome

3. 3 17.11.2015/PZ Resolution feedback to RPF RPF – May 2006 Resolution #2 of November 2005 “That a working group be formed to establish closer cooperation between aggregate suppliers and their customers and clients that will lead to more realistic specifications and better utilisation of materials”

4. 4 17.11.2015/PZ Resolution feedback to RPF RPF – May 2006 Background  Suppliers (ASPASA members) make use of exclusion clauses due to the thorough understanding of material behavior.  Client in conjunction with the consultant make use of Colto and onerous contract specifications.  Contractor is left between a rock and a hard place.  How do we solve this problem?

5. 5 17.11.2015/PZ Resolution feedback to RPF RPF – May 2006 Meeting  Venue – Holcim House, Johannesburg, Gauteng  Date – 17 January 2006  Attendants  G Neser SARMA / Holcim  H LangenhovenSAFSEC  Q KoenSAACE / Wearne  D EriksenHolcim  B PerrieC&CI  L AlbertsPPC  J SmithLafarge  A WeidemanAspasa / Holcim  N PienaarAspasa

6. 6 17.11.2015/PZ Resolution feedback to RPF RPF – May 2006 Outcome  Positive about the use of only SANS specifications, with input from all sectors.  There is a need for a industry workshop on compaction, based on practical skills (Not a theoretical workshop).  Suppliers will be invited to attend all future SAFSEC conferences.  We need to incorporate key players in the industry, and request any assistance.  This group must work towards solving problems, prior to publication of any specification.  This workgroup must represent the majority off the industry.

7. 7 17.11.2015/PZ Resolution feedback to RPF RPF – May 2006 Thank You Working to find a common solution to a more sustainable future Any Questions