1. All components of an accountability system will be aligned in a manner that best support States in improving results for infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities, and their families. OSEP – Results -Driven Accountability Primary Monitoring Focus (20 USC 616(a)(2)) is Improving educational results and functional outcomes for all children with disabilities versus ensuring that States meet IDEA program procedural requirements. R DA 1

2. Collaboration Technical Assistance Accountability Leadership OSEP – R DA Strands of Action 2

3. R ESULTS -D RIVEN A CCOUNTABILITY Services include the distribution of resources with or without a direct request for the info. Support provided to multiple sites based on common needs in a few specific areas. Support provided to select sites. Services are a negotiated set of activities designed to reach a valued outcome. 3

4. SPP/APR measures compliance and results Determinations reflect performance for results and compliance Differentiated monitoring and technical assistance that supports improvement OSEP – R DA 4

5. A comprehensive, multi-year plan, moving from individual indicator improvement activities to broad strategies focused on improving results for students with an IEP. New OSEP Proposed Indicator FFY 2013 to FFY 2018 Comprehensive, ambitious yet achievable plan A “significant piece of work” Will be used in determinations SSIP State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) 5

6. SSIP : Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) D ATA A NALYSIS I DENTIFICATION OF THE F OCUS FOR I MPROVEMENT I NFRASTRUCTURE TO S UPPORT I MPROVEMENT & B UILD C APACITY To determine the areas for improvement ➲ Report analysis methodology, data quality issues, additional data needs ➲ Identify compliance issues that are barriers to achieving improved student results Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) 6

7. D ATA A NALYSIS I DENTIFICATION OF THE F OCUS FOR I MPROVEMENT I NFRASTRUCTURE TO S UPPORT I MPROVEMENT & B UILD C APACITY SSIP : Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Identification of the Focus for Improvement ➲ Describe strategies that will lead to a measureable student-based result ➲ Demonstrate how strategies will build LEA capacity to improve student results Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) 7

8. D ATA A NALYSIS I DENTIFICATION OF THE F OCUS FOR I MPROVEMENT I NFRASTRUCTURE TO S UPPORT I MPROVEMENT & B UILD C APACITY Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) SSIP : Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Describe within the State System regarding: ➲ Decision-making process ➲ Representatives that must be involved in planning for systematic improvements 8

9. D ATA A NALYSIS I DENTIFICATION OF THE F OCUS FOR I MPROVEMENT I NFRASTRUCTURE TO S UPPORT I MPROVEMENT & B UILD C APACITY Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) SSIP : Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) ➲ State analyzed capacity of its current system to implement & sustain evidence-based practices (state & district level) ➲ Strengths, weaknesses, & coordination of governance, fiscal, quality standards, PD, data, TA & accountability ➲ A nalysis of any initiatives in the State which may impact SWIs 9

10. D ATA A NALYSIS I DENTIFICATION OF THE F OCUS FOR I MPROVEMENT I NFRASTRUCTURE TO S UPPORT I MPROVEMENT & B UILD C APACITY Theory of Action (IF-THEN…) SSIP : Phase 1 (submitted in Feb. 2015) Based on the State-identified, measurable improvement in results for SWI ➲ Describe the strategies & outcomes that will need to be met to achieve the identified results ➲ Describe the changes in the State System, districts, & schools and provider practices that must occur to achieve the identified results 10

11. I NFRASTRUCTURE D EVELOPMENT S UPPORT FOR LEA I MPLEMENTATION OF E VIDENCE - B ASED P RACTICES E VALUATION P LAN SSIP : Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016) 11

12. I NFRASTRUCTURE D EVELOPMENT S UPPORT FOR LEA I MPLEMENTATION OF E VIDENCE - B ASED P RACTICES E VALUATION P LAN SSIP : Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016) 12

13. I NFRASTRUCTURE D EVELOPMENT S UPPORT FOR LEA I MPLEMENTATION OF E VIDENCE - B ASED P RACTICES E VALUATION P LAN SSIP : Phase 2 (submitted in Feb. 2016) 13

14. SSIP : Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017) R ESULTS OF O NGOING E VALUATION R EVISIONS TO SPP 14

15. R ESULTS OF O NGOING E VALUATION R EVISIONS TO SPP SSIP : Phase 3 (submitted in Feb. 2017) 15

16. F UTURE : P ROVIDE I NPUT D URING A LL P HASES How does it affect me? T ODAY : S UGGEST A REAS FOR A NALYSIS 16

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 21

22. 22

23. 23

24. A Responsive, Durable System… 24

25. Draft Action Timelines 25