1. Overview 10 minutes Goals 10 minutes Objectives 10 minutes Performance based approach 10 minutes Complexity 20 minutes Tools Exercise 15 minutes Conclusion 5 minutes

2. NameAffiliationNameAffiliation David Saah; Co-LeadUniversity of San Francisco, SIGPhan Xuan ThieuVinh University, Vietnam Mohd Zaki Hamzah; Co-LeadUniversity Putra MalaysiaChalita SriladdaUSAID-LEAD Khamla Phanvilay, Co-LeadNational University of LaosHoang Thi Thu DuyenVietnam Forestry University, Vietnam Cao Thuy AnhDalat University, VietnamLadawan PuangchitKasetsart University, Thailand Chalermpol SamranpongChiang Mai University, ThailandDo Anh TuanVietnam Forestry University, Vietnam Pham Thanh NamUSAID LEAF VietnamLyna KhanRoyal University of Phnom Penh, Cambodia Peter StephenUSAID LEAF BangkokLe Ba ThuongVietnam Forestry University, Vietnam Hoang Vinh PhuVinh University, VietnamNapat JakwattanaUniversity of Phayao, Thailand Vipak JintanaKasetsart University, ThailandNur Anishah Binti AzizUniversity Kebangsaan Malaysia Kulala MulungPNG University of TechnologyRatcha ChaichanaKasetsart University, Thailand Somvilay ChanthalounnavongNational University of LaosSureerat LakanavichianChiang Mai University, Thailand Thavrak HuonRoyal University of Agriculture, CambodiaVongphet SihapanyaNational University of Laos Athsaphangthong MunelithUSAID LEAF LaosDavid GanzUSAID LEAF Bangkok Attachai JintrawetChiang Mai University, ThailandChi Pham, Project CoordinatorUSAID LEAF Bangkok Chanin ChiumkanokchaiUSAID LEAF BangkokKent ElliottUS Forest Service Lam Ngoc TuanDalat University, VietnamBeth LebowUS Forest Service Mark FennUSAID Vietnam Forests & DeltasGeoffrey BlateUS Forest Service

3. Low Emission Land Use Planning (LELUP) Section 1. Enabling Environment 1.3. Planning & Development Goals & Objectives Regional Climate Change Curriculum Development

4. ENABLING ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT CONDITION ANALYSIS OF FUTURE OPTIONS NEGOTIATING & PRIORITIZING IMPLEMENTA- TION PLAN MONITORING & EVALUATION Low Emission Land Use Planning 1.1. Regulatory Assessments 1.2. Stakeholder Engagement 1.3. Planning & Development Goals & Objectives 2.1. Environment, Social, & Economic Data Needs 2.2. Understanding Historic Land Use Change 2.3. Data & Capacity Gap Assessment 3.1. Modeling Future Trends 3.2. Business as Usual Baseline Construction 3.3. Scenario Assessment 4.3. Implementation Needs 4.2. Priorities & Sequence Implementation Activities 4.1. Negotiating Agreement on Options 5.1. Establish M&E Framework 5.2. Monitor & Measure Progress 5.3. Evaluate, Report & Adapt

5. At the end of this session, learners will be able to:  Identify Elements Necessary for LELUP  Identify GOALS  Identify OBJECTIVES

6. Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati on Plan Land Use Planning Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS) Conservation Planning GHG Accounting Understanding Historical Land Use Change Low Emission Land Use Planning

7. Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati on Plan Land Use Planning Low Emission Land Use Planning Land Use Planning Wehrmann, B. (2011), Land Use Planning. Concepts, Tools and Applications, February 2011, Published by GIZ, Eschborn, Germany.Land Use Planning. Concepts, Tools and Applications The Land PortalThe Land Portal – a web resource

8. Low Emission Development Planning Low Emission Development Strategy Gateway – a web resource Low Emission Capacity Building Program – a web resource Platform for Climate-Smart Planning – a web resource Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati on Plan Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS) Low Emission Land Use Planning

9. Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati on Plan Conservation Planning  Conservation Measures Partnership (2013), Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation, Version 3.0/April 2013Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation  The Open Conservation Measures Partnership – a web resource The Open Conservation Measures Partnership Conservation Planning Low Emission Land Use Planning

10. GHG Accounting Low Emission Land Use Planning Carbon Accounting The LEAF project tools and guidance documents: LEAF’s Tools and Resources.LEAF’s Tools and Resources Key references include: Walker, S., Swalis, E., Petrova, S., Goslee, K. Casarim, F. Grais, A. and Brown, S. (2012), Technical Guidance on Development of a REDD+ Reference Level, Developed by Winrock International the LEAF Project.Technical Guidance on Development of a REDD+ Reference Level

11. Understanding Historical Land Use Change Low Emission Land Use Planning LEAF (2013), ARKN-FCC Decisions Support Tool – Identifying and Addressing Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation, Prepared by Climate Focus for AFKN-FCC (Unpublished). Kissinger, G., M. Herold, V. De Sy. Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation: A Synthesis Report for REDD+ Policymakers. Lexeme Consulting, Vancouver Canada, August 2012.Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation: A Synthesis Report for REDD+ Policymakers

12. Goals are formal statements that detail the desired impact of the plan and are:  Linked to targets  Impact orientated  Specific  Measurable  Time limited (generally 10 years or more)

13. Objectives are formal statements detailing the desired outcomes of the plan and are:  Results orientated  Practical  Specific  Measurable  Time limited (generally three to ten years)

14.  Results-based management is a strategic management approach used to plan, cost, implement, monitor and measure the changes from cooperation, rather than just the inputs provided or activities conducted.

15. Source: UN+REDD Vietnam, 2013

16. Rules of the Game Objective: Rules of the Game

17.  Why is it important to set Goals and Objectives for a Low Emission Land use Planning (LELUP) process?  What might be a goal and objective for a LELUP process?

18. Negotiate and Prioritize Implementati on Plan  Understanding CONTEXT  A future VISION of the landscape.  Description of CRITICAL FACTORS.  Establish CRITERIA.

19. Objective 1 Understand that will have many objectives  Maximize positive impact  Minimize negative impact  Optimize all impact Objective 2 Objective 3

20. Early in the Planning Process  Increased carbon storage  Positive economic growth  Improved drinking water accessibility Later in the Planning Process  10% increase over 3 years  2.5% growth increase per year  2 new wells in remote villages per year

21. Some goals may already be established by an existing plan at a higher level National Province District

22. Some goals may already be established by an existing plan at a lower level Commune Province District

23. Provincial SEDP: increase annual GDP from 12-15% National Vietnam Policy: maintain 60% forest cover Provincial SEDP: reduce population growth to 1.3% Bao Lam SFC: actively manage 17,300 ha production forest Local Communities: PFES contracting to protect specific forest areas Lam Dong Province Land Use Plan

24. National Influencing Factors Within 10 years: 1. 20% GHG reductions 2. 20% economic growth 3. Lower poverty rate by 20% 4. Mainstream REDD+ into FPDP Need to examine the issue/problem??? Local Influencing Factors 1. PFES in place in several Districts 2. State Forest Companies manage both production and protection of forest

25.  Which of the previous goals are qualitative versus quantitative?  Should or can the quantitative goals be refined? How or Why?  How do we develop an integrated LE LUP?

26. Environmental 1. Maintain 61% forest cover by 2015 2. Take proactive action to cope with climate change 3. Maintain or improve ecological integrity

27. Economic 1. Increase annual GDP growth rate from 12 to 15% 2. Increase GDP per capita to 2300 USD by 2015 3. No poor households by 2020

28. Social 1. Reduce population growth to 1.3% (2015) and 1.2% (2020) 2. 85% of rural populations will have access to fresh water by 2015 and 100% by 2020 3. Number of malnutrition under 5 years of age reduced to less than 5% by 2020.

29.  Which of the previous goals are qualitative versus quantitative?  Should or can the quantitative goals be refined? How or Why?  How do we develop an integrated LE LUP?

30. Any method or tool that gets stakeholders communicating is a successful one  Be creative  Different tools or methods may be needed for different stakeholders

31. The Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation http://www.conservationmeasures.org/

32.  A contextual understanding of LU LEP  Setting objectives that stakeholders can measure their needs against

33.  A common vision.  Identify major ‘drivers’ and inter-connections.

34. FOREST Watershed FARM PARK FARM City Provence

35.  National level policies and strategies may have set arbitrary GHG emission reduction targets which are expected to be met at the sub-national level.  The need to quickly access funds creates goals and targets that can be unrealistic.  The development of goals and objectives is considered a one-of process.

36.  Low Emission Land Use Planning can align incentives for cross-sectorial integration

37. Discussion on Enabling Environment:  GIZ (2011) Land Use Planning: Concept, Tools and Applications  Mekong River Commission (2011), (2011) Manual for Training Trainers in IWRM in the Mekong Basin - Training Manual.  Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation