Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments"— Presentation transcript:

1 Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments
Unit 35 Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments

2 Comparing Different Environments in Terms of Damage Potential
Base Input is Navmat P9492 PSD, 60 sec Duration SDOF Response fn=300 Hz, Q=10 Assume fatigue exponent of (Steinberg's value for electronic equipment) What is equivalent sine level in terms of fatigue damage?

3 NAVMAT P9492 Synthesized Time History
Save as: accel_input

4 Synthesized Time History Histogram

5 Synthesized Time History PSD Verification

6 SDOF Response to Synthesis, Narrowband Random
Acceleration Response absolute peak = G overall = 13.9 GRMS Std dev = 13.9G (for zero mean) Peak response = 4.6 sigma Save as: accel_resp

7 Statistical Relation  = standard deviation [ RMS ] 2 = [  ] 2 + [ mean ]2 RMS =  assuming zero mean

8 SDOF Response to Synthesis, Narrowband Random, Histogram

9 Damage Index for Relative Comparisons between Environments
A damage index D can be calculated using where is the response amplitude from the rainflow analysis is the corresponding number of cycles b is the fatigue exponent

10 Rainflow Cycles for SDOF (fn=300 Hz, Q=10) Response to PSD, Exponent=6

11 Equivalent Sine Level What is equivalent Sine Input Level at 300 Hz for 60 second duration? Again, SDOF Response fn=300 Hz, Q=10 Assume fatigue exponent of 6.4 Modified Relative Damage Index for Steady-state Sine Response is the response f Excitation Frequency T Duration Y Base Input Acceleration Q Amplification Factor b Fatigue Index

12 Equivalent Sine Level (cont)
f 300 Hz T 60 sec Q 10 b 6.4 D 2.6e+13 Y=2.7 G (Sine Base Input at 300 Hz) (QY) =27 G (Sine Response) Random Response overall = 13.9 GRMS = G (1-sigma) for zero mean) Equivalent Sine Response Amplitude  2-sigma Random Response Repeat analysis for other Q and b values as needed. Run additional PSD synthesis cases for statistical rigor.

13 Equivalent Sine Level (cont)
vibrationdata > fatigue toolbox > Miscellaneous > Equivalent Sine Input for Given Damage Level

14 Histogram Comparison, Base Inputs
Random, Normal Distribution Sine, Bathtub Curve Even though histograms differ, we can still do equivalent damage calculation for engineering purposes. This is Engineering not Physics!

15 Converting a Sine Tone to Narrowband PSD
Assume a case where the base input is a sine tone which must be converted to a narrowband PSD The conversion will be made in terms of the acceleration response of the mass to each input Assume Q and fatigue exponent Calculate fatigue damage for sine tone Select frequency limits for narrowband PSD One-twelfth octave band is used for this example Assume initial PSD level of 1 G^2/Hz Calculated SDOF response to narrowband PSD Calculate narrowband damage using Dirlik method Scale PSD level to match sine damage

16 Converting a Sine Tone to Narrowband PSD
vibrationdata > fatigue toolbox > Miscellaneous > Equivalent Narrowband Random PSD for Sine Input

17 Converting a Sine Tone to Narrowband PSD
18 G, 100 Hz, Sine Tone converted to One-twelfth Octave band PSD Q b PSD (G^2/Hz) 10 4 19.9 6.4 15.0 9 12.0 30 31.7 23.9 19.1 Highest Q and lowest b give most conservative PSD level


Download ppt "Using Fatigue to Compare Sine and Random Environments"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google