Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHarvey Lambert Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 STAR Results High-p T, Electro-Magnetic and Heavy Flavor Probes Manuel Calderón de la Barca UC Davis for the STAR Collaboration
2
2 Outline Di-hadron correlations: Interaction of jet with bulk - Correlations: charged and identified Systematics of h-h correlations vs p T trig, assoc, mid- forward . Hard Probes: Comparison to calculable processes Photons : Direct in d+Au collisions Heavy Flavor Production Charm cross section e-h correlations: b contribution to non-photonic electrons Midrapidity (1s+2s+3s) production in p+p -h correlations in p+p
3
3 - Correlations: Background Near-side long range correlation in STAR, nucl-ex/0509030 near side “ridge” How do structures, yields, evolve… Centrality, kinematics (wide pt ranges), particle identification? Little guidance from theory: data driven approach Phys. Rev. C73 (2006) 064907 mid-central AuAu p t < 2 GeV d+Au, 40-100%Au+Au, 0-5% 3 < p T (trig) < 6 GeV 2 < p T (assoc) < p T (trig) 0.8< p t < 4 GeV nucl-ex/0607003 See Poster by Ron Longacre / √ ref
4
4 Study near-side yields Study away-side correlated yields and shapes Components near-side jet peak near-side ridge v2 modulated background - Component Picture Strategy: Subtract from projection: isolate ridge-like correlation Definition of “ridge yield”: ridge yield := Jet+Ridge( ) Jet( ) Can also subtract large . 3<p t,trigger <4 GeV p t,assoc. >2 GeV Au+Au 0-10% preliminary
5
5 The “Ridge” + “Jet” yield vs Centrality 3<p t,trigger <4 GeV p t,assoc. >2 GeV Au+Au 0-10% preliminary Jet+Ridge ( ) Jet ( ) Jet ) yield , ) N part “Jet” yield constant with N part See Talk by Jörn Putschke Reminder from p T <2 GeV: elongated structure already in minbias AuAu elongation in p-p to elongation in AuAu. PRC 73, 064907 (2006) p+p. low p T Number corr. Au+Au. low p T pT corr. / √ ref
6
6 Jet + Ridge Charged hadrons: ridge yield increased vs. Npart ,K 0 s both have increase of near-side yield with centrality in Au+Au , K 0 s : ratio of yields in central Au+Au/d+Au ~ 4-5 ridge yield of K 0 S < ridge yield of -> “ridge” yield increases with centrality -> “jet” yield is constant vs Npart same yield as in d+Au ,K 0 s Near-side associated yield vs centrality, Au+Au See Talk by Jana Bielcikova Jet
7
7 STAR preliminary Central AuAu: Ridge, Jet Yield vs p T, trig p T, assoc p t,assoc. > 2 GeV Ridge yield ~ constant (slightly decreasing) vs. p T trig Ridge Jet “Jet spectrum” much harder than inclusive gets harder w/ increasing p t,trigger “Ridge spectrum” close to inclusive ~ independent of p t,trigger Central Ridge Persists up to highest p T trig See Talk by Jörn Putschke STAR preliminary
8
8 Measure hadron triggered fragmentation functions: D h1,h2 (z T ) z T =p T assoc /p T trig Similarity between AuAu and dAu after ridge subtraction Are the AuAu results with the ridge subtracted the same as dAu, EVEN at low p T ? Near-side z T Distributions: “Jet” Preliminary See Talk by Mark Horner
9
9 Near-side z T distributions similar to dAu no 50% dilution from thermal coalescence triggers? Phys.Rev. C70 (2004) 024905 Measure hadron triggered fragmentation functions: D h1,h2 (z T ) z T =p T assoc /p T trig Ratio AuAu/dAu Similarity between AuAu and dAu after ridge subtraction See Talk by Mark Horner Near-side z T Distributions: “Jet” Preliminary 8<p T trig <15 GeV/c STAR PRL 97 162301
10
10 Away-Side: p T trig Dependence 0-12% 1.3 < p T assoc < 1.8 GeV/c 4.0 < p T trig < 6.0 GeV/c 6.0 < p T trig < 10.0 GeV/c Away-side: Structures depend on range of p T. becomes flatter with increasing p T trig yield increases 3.0 < p T trig < 4.0 GeV/c AuAu 0-12% Central contribution to away-side becomes more significant with harder p T trig => fills dip Preliminary Away side See Talk by Mark Horner
11
11 High z T for hard triggers shows “standard” suppression (~0.2) Larger yields seen at low z T or low p T trig bulk response Deviation from suppression depends on p T trig Away-side: z T Distributions Preliminary 2.5 8 GeV/c (STAR PRL 97, 162301) See Talk by Mark Horner
12
12 Correlation from FTPC to MTPC Trigger: 3<p T trig <4 GeV/c, A.FTPC: 0.2<p T assoc < 2 GeV/c, A.TPC: 0.2<p T assoc < 3 GeV/c Near-side correlation: consistent with zero Away-side correlations are very similar! Energy loss picture is the same for mid- and forward ? Need quantitative calculations for correlations analyses! AuAu 0-10% AuAu 0-5% AuAu 60-80% STAR Preliminary 2.7<| η assoc |<3.9 See Talk by Levente Molnar STAR Preliminary
13
13 Hard Probes: 0 ’s and in STAR EMCal 0 s in p+p preliminary result from subset of year 5 data good agreement with pQCD + KKP fragmentation disfavors Kretzer FFs d+Au direct photons and d+Au double ratio: ( incl / 0) / ( decay / 0) = 1 + dir / decay direct signal consistent with NLO pQCD baseline results for Au+Au analysis No discrepancy between STAR & PHENIX. See Talk by Martijn Russcher
14
14 d NN cc /dy from p+p to A+A D 0, e ±, and μ ± combined fit Advantage: Covers ~95% of cross section Mid-rapidity d NN cc /dy vs Nbin NN cc follows binary scaling Charm production from initial state (as expected) Higher than FONLL prediction in pp collisions. See Talk by Chen Zhong
15
15 Checking STAR electrons Discrepancy between STAR and PHENIX Investigated method to estimate Photonic background. No issues found. Reanalyzed from scratch pp results change by ~25% dAu results change by ~10% AuAu results do not change Within systematics Still difference btw. STAR & PHENIX R AA still slightly below most c+b calculations. Future: low material run Improve uncertainty on background Issue remains: no information on contribution from beauty. PHENIX hep-ex/0609010 STAR, submitted to PRL STAR Au+Au 0-5%
16
16 Can we tell how much beauty? Use e-h Correlation Large B mass compared to D Semileptonic decay: e gets larger kick from B. Broadened e-h correlation on near-side. Extract B contribution Use PYTHIA shapes Con: Model dependent Pro: Depends on decay kinematics well described Fit ratio B/(B+D) See Talk by Xiaoyan Lin e-h from B e-h from D Fit
17
17 p+p 200 GeV B contribution to NP electrons vs. p T Fit e-h correlation with PYTHIA Ds and Bs Non-zero B contribution Contribution consistent with FONLL Model dependent (PYTHIA) Depends mainly on kinematics of D/B decay (not on Fragmentation). Dominant systematic uncertainty: photonic background rejection efficiency Additional uncertainties under study See Talk by Xiaoyan Lin Beauty !
18
18 More Beauty: signal in p+p Large dataset sampled in Run VI Luminosity limited trigger Analyzed 5.6 pb -1, with corrections. Measure (1s+2s+3s) d /dy at y=0 STAR Preliminary p+p 200 GeV e+e- M inv Background Subtracted See Talk by Pibero Djawotho e+e- M inv Unlike-Sign Pairs — Like-Sign Pairs STAR Preliminary p+p 200 GeV
19
19 Mid-rapidity (1s+2s+3s) Cross section Integrate yield at mid-rapidity: |y|<0.5 (1s+2s+3s) BR * d /dy 91 ± 28 stat ± 22 syst pb -1 (Preliminary) Consistent with NLO pQCD calculations at midrapidity. Trigger ready for next run and RHIC II: luminosity limited STAR Preliminary p+p 200 GeV See Talk by Pibero Djawotho y d /dy (nb) Counts
20
20 p+p Towards -jet: ( , 0)-h Correlation analysis See Talk by Subhasis Chattopadhyay Use “shower-shapes” in EMC: Create two samples Enriched photon sample (mix , 0 ) Enriched 0 sample (almost pure 0 ) Reduction in near angle peak in Photon sample Away-side yields only slightly reduced Effect more prominent for larger Et trigger 0 Mixed Photon
21
21 Promising for future -jet studies: RHIC II Spectra for -tagged Events Use -enriched sample: plot away-side p T -spectra for photon-tagged events Matches charged hadron spectra in direct photon events from HIJING. See Talk by Subhasis Chattopadhyay
22
22 Conclusions and Outlook Near Side : Broadening along . (“Jet”+” Ridge”) “ridge” yield: steep increase with centrality, “jet” yield: constant with centrality, increasing with p T trig After subtraction of long range , D(z T ) similar to dAu. Unmodified “jet” after subtraction? Away side: Central: contribution to = increases with harder p T trig, fills dip Away side jet shapes at forward rapidities : similar to midrapidity in d+Au and Au+Au Energy loss picture is similar at forward and mid-rapidity? Direct Signal in d+Au matches pQCD Charm Larger than NLO by ~4, Still difference with PHENIX. Beauty: Non-zero beauty contribution to non-photonic electrons (1s+2s+3s) in p+p: Consistent with pQCD at y=0. -h correlations : First -jet measurement. -h : First steps towards RHIC II.
23
23 Backup
24
24 correlation functions before elliptic flow subtraction correlation functions after elliptic flow subtraction syst. error due to v 2 uncertainty ~ 25% Correlation, strange particle triggers, Au+Au 200 GeV Selection criteria: 3.0 GeV/c < p T trigger < 3.5 GeV/c 1 GeV/c < p T associated < 2 GeV/c | | < 1 STAR preliminary trigger: baryon/meson baryon/antibaryon See Talk by J. Bielcikova
25
25 Direct photons for correlation analysis Standard methods used for extraction of photons: Statistical method by Reconstruction of inclusive photons Subtract photons from decay of etc. Cannot be used for correlation. Method: Enhance using difference in shower shapes.. Compare correlation functions between -enriched (narrow EM showers) 0-enriched (broader EM showers) mixed PHOTON 00
26
26 Associated p T Dependence Centrality : 0 - 12% Associated p T (rows): 0.3 – 0.8 GeV/c 0.8 – 1.3 GeV/c 1.3 – 1.8 GeV/c 2.0 – 4.0 GeV/c Triggers (columns): 2.5 – 4.0 GeV/c 3.0 – 4.0 GeV/c 4.0 – 6.0 GeV/c 6.0 – 10.0 GeV/c Detailed cases: 3 rd row right column 7 p T trig p T assoc Preliminary see talk by M. Horner
27
27 Heavy Flavor Production e-h Correlations Understanding features in heavy quark measurements requires experimental measurement of B and D contributions. First try: use non- photonic electron correlations. See talk from Xiaoyan Lin
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.