Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRosaline Rosa Miller Modified over 9 years ago
1
Multi-Epoch Star Formation? The Curious Case of Cluster 1806-20 Stephen Eikenberry University of Florida 11 April 2007
2
SGR 1806-20 Soft Gamma-Ray Repeater – highly- magnetized (B ~10 15 G) neutron star Radio nebula (not SNR) Chandra X-ray position IR-identified cluster of massive stars (Eikenberry et al., 2001; Kaplan et al., 2002) ISO images still embedded in molecular cloud (Fuchs et al., 1999) Large LOS reddening (A V ~30 mag)
3
Cluster 1806-20 Several luminous OB supergiant stars Multiple Wolf-Rayet stars of various types Two WC9d stars (~10% of the known Galactic population) SGR is near edge of cluster core (“x”) Brightest star is Luminous Blue Variable (source of radio nebula) Projected image size ~3pc on a side (!!)
4
Distance CO & Galactic rotation distance to molecular clouds A V, N H & CO suggest “far” distance for cluster Radio source shows NH 3 absorption from MC73 d = 15.1 (+1.8, -1.3) kpc (Corbel & Eikenberry, 2004)
5
LBV 1806-20 IR spectra give extinction, temperature (velocity consistent with MC) With distance L > 4x10 6 L 0 (similar to Eta Car and Pistol Star) Implies mass > 150 M 0 (Eddington-based) Not a cluster; is it a binary?? Even if binary, minimum mass > 75 M 0 So … SGR = neutron star already; if same birthdate, progenitor must have been more massive than LBV But, stars > 75 M 0 don’t make neutron stars (??; max progenitor mass < 25 M 0 ) Could be multi-epoch SF?
6
Is LBV 1806-20 that big? Figer et al., 2004 find double-lined spectra binary? (or wind structure??) Assume v sys = v mid Then, Galactic rotation implies d = 11.7 kpc Claim this is “strong difference” from Eikenberry et al. 2004 (but no error bars in Figer et al. 2004 …)
7
Reduced Distance Means … Lower luminosity, thus lower mass (130 M 0 ) Binary implies 65 M 0 lower limit on most massive star Figer et al. (2005) near-IR spectra of several high- mass stars in cluster Claim consistent with single age = 3-4 Myr & SGR progenitor > 50 M 0 No need for multi-epoch SF (?? – still » 25M 0 ; plus, why did 50 M 0 star blow up before 65 M 0 star? …)
8
Is LBV 1806-20 that close? Figer et al. give no uncertainties (!); d ~ 2.5 (only “Eikenberry” error bars) Figer used mismatched GC distance; correct that d = 12.5 kpc (difference now <2 ) Also, v mid assumes that the binary mass ratio q = 1.000 (not necessarily true!) Model spectra q 1-5 (Lavine, Eikenberry, Smith)
9
Is LBV 1806-20 that close? Also, Figer et al distance implies that both WC9d stars are least luminous in their class (anywhere!) Assume WC9d here has minimum luminosity of any other known WC9d d> 15 kpc d = 10.7 – 18.1 kpc consistent with (fully encompasses) original distance Center of range = 14.4 kpc (~0.5 of “Eikenberry-only” error bars)
10
Back to Multi-Epoch SF? Original distance more robust than others, but consistent with all (once you put in error bars!) M LBV > 150 M 0 total; >75 M 0 for binary More: we see major LBV line variability (factors of ~5-6 variation in EW in 1 year) implies that one star is dominant source of ionizing radiation Thus, even if it is a binary, probable q>1 and mass limit >> 75 M 0 (And … something BIGGER made a neutron star ???) Single birthdate starting to stretch the imagination (if not smoking gun, at least “smoldering slingshot”)
11
The Smoking Gun (??) MIRLIN IRTF observations N1 LBV and WC9 star N4 & N5 central source Qs 13 Jy point source (!!); embedded protostar? Qs luminosity > L bol for 20 M 0 star massive protostar NS progenitor born >2-3 Myr ago This object <1 Myr old
12
Conclusions Cluster 1806-20 is a rich/weird environment: SGRs, WRs, LBVs, etc., all within R<1 pc Best distance estimate (still) 15.1 kpc LBV 1806-20 is a very luminous/massive star(s?) Either a star > 75 (150) M 0 made a neutron star, or we have multi-epoch star formation here Apparent embedded massive protostar with much younger age independently suggests MESF One idea: NS progenitor forms, explodes near cloud edge; SN shock penetrates cloud and triggers burst of SF – particularly, unusually massive stars (???)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.