1. Single Factor or One-Way ANOVA Comparing the Means of 3 or More Groups Chapter 10

2. ANOVA Terminology The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of intensity of training (low, med, high) on aerobic fitness (VO 2 ). The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of intensity of training (low, med, high) on aerobic fitness (VO 2 ). The independent variable Intensity of Training is called a FACTOR. The independent variable Intensity of Training is called a FACTOR. The FACTOR has 3 LEVELS (low, med, high) The FACTOR has 3 LEVELS (low, med, high) The dependent variable in this experiment is VO 2 The dependent variable in this experiment is VO 2 ANOVA allows for multiple comparisons while still keeping alpha at 0.05. ANOVA allows for multiple comparisons while still keeping alpha at 0.05.

3. Familywise or Experimentwise Error Rate The purpose of this experiment was to compare the effects of NUMBER OF DAYS TRAINING PER WEEK (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) on STRENGTH. The number of days training is a factor with 6 levels. We could use multiple t-tests to compare (1 v 2, 1 v 3, 1 v 4, 1 v 5, 1 v 6; 2 v 3, 2 v 4, 2 v 5, 2 v 6; 3 v 4, 3 v 5, 3 v 6; 4 v 5, 4 v 6; 5 v 6). That would require 15 t-tests. This would cause alpha to inflate from 0.05 to 0.26 greatly increasing the probability of making a Type I ERROR. ANOVA fixes this problem by doing only one test. n is the number of pairwise comparisons, with 6 means alpha =.54

4. Assumptions of ANOVA Dependent variable is interval or ratio. Dependent variable is interval or ratio. The distributions within groups are normally distributed. The distributions within groups are normally distributed. The variances between groups are equal. The variances between groups are equal.

5. The effects of caffeine on run performance The purpose of this experiment was to determine the effects of caffeine on run performance. Fifteen subjects were randomly assigned to one of the following conditions (placebo, low dose, high dose).

6. Levels of Caffeine Factor

7. Enter the dose of caffeine as a fixed factor. This is the independent variable, a between-subjects factor with 3 levels (placebo, low dose, high dose).

8. Check homogeneity of variance if you have a between subjects factor. Choose the Sidak post hoc test.

9. Check homogeneity of variance if you have a between subjects factor. The null hypothesis is that the groups have equal variance. In this case you retain the null. You don’t want this to be significant, if it is significant you are violating an assumption of ANVOA: homogeneity of variance. The groups have equal variance, Levine’s test F(2,12) =.092, p =.913

10. The total variance is the difference between each data point and the grand mean. The model sum of squares variance is the difference between each group mean and the grand mean. The sum of squares error is the variance not explained by the model.

11. The dose of caffeine significantly affects performance F(2,12) = 5.119, p =.025, power =.712 At this point you don’t know which means are different, you will have to look at the post hoc test to see which pairwise comparisons are different. ANOVA Results

12. Post Hoc Results Placebo is different from High Dose. Low Dose is NOT different from High Dose

13. Trend Analysis Results There was a significant linear trend (p =.008), indicating that as the dose of caffeine was increased there was an increase in run performance.

14. Effect Size

15. Homework Analyze the Teach.sav data set from the book, see page 393, Task 1. Do a Sidak post hoc test instead of the planned contrast suggested in the book. Compute the effect size using: Use the Sample Methods and Results section as a guide to write a methods and results section for your homework.