1. Where are we now and where are we going? Capabilities in Remote Sensing and Air Quality Applications ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences UTAH – DEQ Training Course April 22 – 25, 2013

2. Brauer M, Ammann M, Burnett R et al. GBD 2010 Outdoor Air Pollution Expert Group 2011 Submitted –under review Global Status of PM2.5 Monitoring Ground Sensor Network Population Density  Many countries do not have PM2.5 mass measurements  Spatial distribution of air pollution derived from existing ground networks does not correlate with high population density  Surface measurements are not cost effective  How about using remote sensing satellites?

3. Why Use Remote Sensing Data? Spatial Coverage – Ground Monitors - Satellite (MODIS) Pixel Locations White Areas – No Data (Most likely due to clouds)

4. Particulate Matter Aerosols absorb and scatter light. Satellites measure the reflected light. We estimate total column aerosol. Total column aerosol is used to estimate ground levels of PM 2.5.

5. Door #1 Door #2 Door #3

7. Satellite measurements are a total column, not always correlated with surface Air Quality ! 7 AirNOW PM 2.5 MODIS AOD

8. Principal Satellites in Air Quality Remote Sensing 2300 Km MODIS 2400 Km OMI 1Km CALIPSO (CALIOP) 380 Km MISR

9. Determining Ground Level Exposure Using Remote Sensing Data 1)Past and current techniques 1)Current and future methods a)Long term monitoring b)Real time measurements c)Air quality forecasting

10. Historical Methods Relating Satellite AOD and Ground Level PM2.5 Correlations of MODIS and MISR AOD and PM 2.5

11. Sensitive groups should avoid all physical activity outdoors; everyone else should avoid prolonged or heavy exertion Sensitive groups should avoid prolonged or heavy exertion; everyone else should reduce prolonged or heavy exertion Sensitive groups should reduce prolonged or heavy exertion Unusually sensitive people should consider reducing prolonged or heavy exertion None Cautionary Statements 201-300 151-200 101-150 51-100 0-50 Index Values PM 10 (ug/m 3 ) PM 2.5 (ug/m 3 ) Category 355-424 255-354 155-254 55-154 0-54 150.5-250.4 65.5-150.4 40.5-65.4 15.5-40.4 0-15.4Good Very Unhealthy Unhealthy Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups Moderate Environmental Agencies & Public Looking for… WHOUSA 15 35 150 - Public Decision/Policy Makers Media Researchers

12. Gupta, 2008 AOT-PM2.5 Relationship

13. Courtesy of Ray Hoff, AWMA 39th Critical Review Critical Review of Column AOD to Ground PM relationships Widely varying slopes on this regression Seasonal dependence, humidity dependence, Planetary Boundary Height dependence, regional dependence Error in the slopes lead to propagated error in the PM 2.5 predictions Likely not adequate for regulatory compliance Hoff and Christopher, 2009

14. Some Promising Methods Using Existing Data Combining Global Process Models with Satellite Data Combining Statistical Models, Satellite Data and Ground Measurements Combining Ground Instruments, Lidar and Satellite Measurements

15. Relating Column Measurements and Ground Concentrations Estimated PM 2.5 = η· τ (AOD) Some key factors we may need to know to accurately determine Vertical Structure meteorological effects diurnal effects Aerosol mass aerosol type humidification of the aerosol η Correlations vary from region to region as do the factors which have the greatest influence on η Following Liu et al., 2004:

16. Van Donkelaar et al. relate satellite-based measurements of aerosol optical depth to PM 2.5 using a global chemical transport model Combining Global Process Model and Satellite Observations Estimated PM 2.5 = η· τ Combined MODIS/MISR Aerosol Optical Depth GEOS-Chem Following Liu et al., 2004: vertical structure aerosol type meteorological effects meteorology diurnal effects η van Donkelaar et al., EHP, 2011

17. Reasonable agreement with coincident ground measurements over NA Satellite Derived In-situ Satellite-Derived [ μ g/m3] In-situ PM 2.5 [μg/m 3 ] Annual Mean PM 2.5 [ μ g/m 3 ] (2001-2006) r MODIS τ 0.40 MISR τ 0.54 Combined τ 0.63 Combined PM 2.5 0.78 van Donkelaar et. at.

18. Annual mean measurements –Outside Canada/US –244 sites (84 non-EU) r = 0.83 (0.91) slope = 0.86 (0.84) bias = 1.15 (-2.52) μg/m 3 Method is globally applicable. It is important to note that model performance can vary significantly with region van Donkelaar et. at.

19. Creating Daily MODIS Correlation Maps Using PM2.5 Measurements Lee et. al. Harvard School of Public Health Can be applied to any region Results can be used to improve daily correlations Combining Statistical Models, Satellite Data and Ground Measurements

20. Recent work by Yang Liu at Emory University Using a statistical model to predict annual exposure  Number of monitoring sites: 119  Exposure modeling domain: 700 x 700 km 2 20

21. Model Performance Evaluation MeanMinMax Model R 2 0.860.560.92 CV R 2 0.700.220.85 Model CV Putting all the data points together, we see unbiased estimates 21

22. Predicted Daily Concentration Surface 22

23. Model Predicted Mean PM 2.5 Surface Note: Annual mean calculated with137 days 23

24. Analysis of the relationship between MODIS aerosol optical depth and particulate matter from 2006 to 2008 Tsai et. al. 2011 Atmospheric Environment Using Coincident Ground Based Data, Lidar, and Satellite Measurements.

25. Lidar is used to identify the (a)Planetary boundary layer (PBL) (b)Haze layer. Elevated layer above the PBL

26. Triangles indicate Terra data and circles indicate Aqua data. Solid and dashed lines represent the linear regressions of AM and PM of sunphotometer AOD corresponding to Terra and Aqua overpasses, respectively. Haze layer Bottom to Top Haze layer Top to Bottom PM2.5 vs. AOD PM2.5*f(RH) vs. AOD/PBLH PM2.5*f(RH) vs. AOD/HLHbt PM2.5*f(RH) vs. AOD/HLHtp

27. Method Application Combining Global Process Models with Satellite Data Annual and Seasonal Combining Statistical Models, Satellite Data and Ground Measurements Daily Prediction, Annual Calculations Combining Ground Instruments, Lidar and Satellite Measurements Seasonal Calculations

28. Tuning the Satellite AOD retrieval to local conditions. Use of transport, forecast, numerical and statistical models. Use of additional satellite aerosol and trace gas data. Ground instrument networks for creating daily AOD – PM relationships Use of ground and space borne lidars for vertical resolution of aerosols and boundary layers Local meteorological data Steps Which Can Be Taken to Improve Remote Sensing-PM 2.5 Correlations

29. OMI – Ozone Monitoring Instrument - Total and Tropospheric Column NO 2 - Total Column O 3 - Boundary layer, Volcanic SO 2 TES – Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer - Vertical profiles of Ozone AIRS – Atmospheric Infrared Sounder MOPITT - Measurements of Pollution in The Troposphere - Vertical profiles and columns CO Trace Gas Measurements from Space: Current and Near Future Capabilities.

30. A word about OMI Ozone in the Troposphere OMI is NOT sensitive to ozone near the surface. There are tropospheric ozone products in development but it cannot be used for AQ monitoring at this time.

31. Method: UV solar backscatter Scattering by Earth surface and atmosphere 2 Ozone layer 1 1 Ozone absorption spectrum 2 316-340nm OMI total column O 3 Approximately 90% of the Ozone is in the stratosphere. Therefore a measure of total column ozone is of limited usefulness for air quality applications.

32. Launched October 28, 2011 on-board the Suomi NPP satellite. OMPS is the next generation OMI instrument and will continue to extend the total ozone record, past the lifetime of OMI. The main purpose is to measure global distribution of ozone in the stratosphere. Includes a Limb profiler to measure vertical structure of stratosphere ozone ONLY from 15 km to 60 km. Aerosol Index (AI) and SO 2 data will also be provided. Data are not publicly available at this time. Release date is not http://npp.gsfc.nasa.gov/omps.html Ozone Mapper Profile Suite (OMPS)

33. Near Future Ozone Products Joint TES/OMI Near surface ozone (surface to 700 hPa) product New product shows improved correlation for the TES/OMI near-surface estimates as compared to TES alone or OMI alone. Citation: Fu, D., et al., Characterization of ozone profiles derived from Aura TES and OMI Radiances, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 12, 27589-27636, doi:10.5194/acpd-12-27589-2012, 2012. Goddard Modeling and Assimilation Office Assimilated Ozone o Incorporates TES and OMI averaging kernals. o Profiles of ozone from the surface to top-of-the-atmosphere

34. The Highest Quality of Data Rests on a Tripod Satellite Data Ground Measurements and In-Situ Data Models

35. Current and Future Prospects Satellite Data Several New Missions in Development Recent Launch of VIIRS Products are improving spatial resolution. Near future launch of geosynchronous satellites will improve temporal resolution Several Missions Beyond Design Life Loss of Main Vertical Resolving Sensor

36. Remote Sensing Capabilities - Current Missions SensorLaunch DateDesign LengthResolutionEnd Date/Problems Terra - MODIS 1999 5 Years 10/3/(1) KM 2015 -2016 Terra – MISR 1999 5 Years 17.6 KM 2015 -2016 Aqua - MODIS 2001 5 Years 10/3/(1) KM 2018 Aura – OMI 2004 6 Years 13 x 27 KM Loss of data Parasol - POLDER 2004 2 Years 18 KMOut of A-Train Calipso - CALIOP 2006 3 Years5 Km x.2 KM ENVISAT – MERIS 2002 10 KM ENVISAT – AATSR 20023x4, 10 KM NPP - VIIRS 2011 5 Years6 KM Goestationary MSG - SEVIRI 2005 10 KM GOES - GASP 2006 5 Years4 KM/30 Min

37. Remote Sensing of Aerosol Capabilities - Upcoming Missions SensorLaunch Date MeasurementsIssues GLORY - APS ? AerosolsNarrow swath ADM - Aoleus 2013 Aerosol/wind profilesNarrow swath GCOM – C 2013 Aerosols/Clouds EarthCARE 2015 Aerosols/CloudsLIDAR Narrow swath OCO-2 2013 CO2/Aerosols TROPOMI 2014 Aerosols/Gases7 KM Resolution/7 Yr. Sentinel-32012 - 2020 AerosolsFew bands ACE 2022AerosolsImprove A-Train Capabilities Geostationary GOES-R 2015 Aerosols TEMPO 2017 Aerosols /GasesPollution Measurements GEO-CAPE 2020 Aerosols

38. Models – Future Prospects Increased computing power Increased understanding of processes Increasing availability of satellite data Models

39. The Future of Remote Sensing and Air Quality Applications Current Status Ground Sensors and in-Situ Data 1.A major source of data for priority pollutants Ozone and PM 2.Provide Validation of Satellite Measurements 3.Provide Necessary Information for Satellite Retrievals 4.Data can improve process models. 5.Networks can be used for statistical modeling

40. Ground Instruments The Weakest Link 2400 out of 3100 counties in the US (31% of total population) have no PM monitoring in the county. Most of the ~1,200 monitors operate every 3 or 6 days.