Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySherilyn Gaines Modified over 9 years ago
1
Facility Alternatives – How Do You Think They Impact Our Values? This exercise may give you some insight into the tradeoffs involved with each alternative. Fill in the table using the appropriate symbol ( + for positive, - for negative, o for neutral) showing how you think each value will be impacted by the alternatives. We’ve filled in the table with one person’s opinion as an example, but what do you think? Do you agree, or do you see it differently? Why? Do you have enough information to make a decision? If not, what other information do you need? Value Alternative Positively Responds to Change Enhances Our Growth Potential Enhances our Ability to Serve the Community Enables Relevant Ministries Builds on a Century of Strengths Enables High Quality Worship Enhances Welcoming and Inviting Enhances Our Learning Programs Achievable Funding and Stewardship Improves Missions and Outreach Risk of Executing (Potential for Long- Term Success) Status Quo --------+-- Regenerate ++++++++ooo Multi-Site +++++oo+ o (if shopping center) - (if second church) + o (if shopping center) - (if second church) Relocate ++++o+++-o-
2
Strategic Question How can FUMC lead and respond in a constructive way to the imminent changes in Katy, so we build on a century of strengths and preserve our mission and values? Definitions Given – something that is assumed, taken as a premise; a fact. Strategy – a big picture, long-term plan of action; a way of maneuvering so that the best outcome is possible. Tactic – small-scale actions that serve a larger purpose; actions of less magnitude focused on a short-term goal. Insights Every alternative needs a strong focus on Welcoming and Involvement – The Vision Team believes a larger budget and special teams are needed to accomplish this. There is a financial/stewardship concern in every facility alternative Any significant facility change will take time to implement (fund-raising, planning, execution) Every alternative has Pros, Cons and Trade Offs Charts in FLC, Education Building & Narthex have additional detail – also on the web at http://fumcvision.katyweb.nethttp://fumcvision.katyweb.net No preference for any alternative is implied. If you have questions, please ask a Vision Team member or email fumcvision@katyweb.netfumcvision@katyweb.net Decision Hierarchy Givens –We are located in Katy –We have aging buildings –Katy is growing and changing –Major ministry choices are made and are effective –Church must connect with new changing community (new membership) Strategy (focus now) –Welcoming –Assimilation (Involvement) –Facilities Tactics (focus later) –Ministry Changes (adjustments) –Buying Real Estate –Technology –Staffing –Training –Measure member involvement Status Quo Only maintain our current facilities; no new building, keep things as they are now. Relocate Sell our current facilities; build new facilities in a more visible location. Regenerate Rebuild/Remodel and enlarge our current facilities in phases. Make improvements to older buildings to make them more visitor & member friendly. May include property purchases. Multi-site Rebuild/remodel current facilities in phases, also add a second site (could range from a small satellite location for ministries (such as preschool or youth or senior center) to a second, full-service church. This looks like Regenerate but with a second location added. Descriptions of the Facility Alternatives Instructions: This page summarizes the facilities decision. Please review the supporting data on this side. The other side is a table of values (columns) and facility alternatives (rows). Please fill in the table using the appropriate symbol (+ - o) showing how you think the values might be impacted by the different alternatives. Estimated Costs of the Alternatives (over 10 years) Status Quo Possible range: $1-$2 million Expected cost: $1.5 million Regenerate $6-13 million for new construction $300,000-$600,000 for teardown costs $800,000 - $1.4 million for additional property Possible range: $7-$15 million Expected cost: $10 million Multi-site If a small second site, $75,000 - $250,000/year for lease, staff & program expenses plus cost of Regeneration Possible range: $7.1-$15.3 million Expected cost: $11 million If a second church, cost of Regeneration + Relocation Possible range: $17-59 million Expected cost: $26 million Relocate 20 to 30 acres land: $3-$26 million depending on location. New construction cost $9-$20 million. Estimated value of current facilities: $2.0-$2.3 million. Possible range: $10-44 million Expected cost: $17 million Positive Response to Change Builds on a century of Strengths Serve The Community Relevant Ministries Growth Potential Learning Programs Missions & Outreach Welcoming Inviting Right Facility High Quality Worship Funding & Stewardship Values Think about the values and how each facility alternative might impact them. Then, fill in the table on the other side.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.