Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKevin Jacobs Modified over 9 years ago
1
Project Overview Waste Pathways: Outlook 2007 Justin Lang, City of Burnside
2
Overview Trial preparation – lead times Background info on GO presentation Scope of organics audits Participation & barriers to uptake Resident survey Composting sessions Recommendations
3
Implementation Large trial area Representative housing, demographics, etc Limited contact with residents Professional information for community
4
Trial brochure Key messages: –Fortnightly service –Place material in GO Bin –Clean & simple to use –Current service has achieved 56% diversion –50% of residual stream is organic (2004 CoB audit) –Bio baskets will help divert up to 75% of residential waste stream –As easy as one, two, three…
6
Audit methodology Adapted from Kerbside Performance reporting: Assess participation and resident behaviour (contamination, no. of bags); Monitor presentation rates, tonnages, yields per household; Assess WHERE organics are going (both waste and GO streams).
8
Results Participation Contamination Diversion (and potential diversion) Weight per bag Bag consumption Yields per household (kilograms)
9
2004 Kerbside Audit (W&R) Composition of material – as presented (n=76) 62% capacity 2 nd bins 62% 69% capacity recyclables waste Compostables (kg) Not assessed Contents not assessed. Not assessed 58% capacity recyclables waste 66% capacity Compostables 53.9% Other material 23.0% Recyclables 17.9% Misc plastics 5.2% Recyclables 96.6% 05/06 Bio Basket Organics Audit (W&GO) Composition of material – as presented (n=245, GO n=192, waste n=241) Compostable green organic material (kg) Food waste & compostable material (kg) contamination (kg) 66% capacity, 2 nd bins 65%
10
Typical participants 5.00 kg food waste / fortnight ~17.00 kg green organics per fortnight Negligible food in residual Rec. W 56% capacity Contents not assessed. 59% capacity Bio bags presented in GO bin Food in residual Rec. W 56% capacity Contents not assessed. “Non participants” Substantial food in residual Rec. W W
11
Participation 245* premises incl. in organics audits 192/245 premises (78%) presented GO bins 132/192 presented food waste in GO Bins (69% of GO Bins presented). Based upon kerbside audits, this represents a participation rate of 54% (132/245). Home composters (~9-18) 3.2 bags per wk/hh
12
Results - diversion 36.3% diversion of the residual organic waste 8.6% diversion of the total waste stream green organics 64.6% diverted 15.4% organic 20% residual recyclables food (8.6%)
13
Food waste per household
14
% diversion of organics per household (No GO presented)
15
% diversion food waste per household
19
Results - contamination Green organics stream –2.79% contamination of green organics bins (by weight) –23% incident rate of contamination –Typically garden pots etc Negligible contamination within cornstarch bags
23
Results – telephone survey 98% trial community awareness 84% had used the system 77% continued to use the system (93% were happy to continue) 81% of current users and 48% former users – “very easy” to use No issues with odour Willingness $, 5+ bags, other disposal methods
25
Composting / sessions Telephone survey 38% (34) composting 13 resident info sessions (3 hr sessions) - free Gedye bin Part of exit strategy (in conjunction with continued use). Cornstarch bags available from Council office.
26
Kerbside collection Performance of trucks (monthly audits) Weight per load & daily tonnages Determine average yield / household Contamination –CCTV –2 strikes policy –Removal of service
29
Barriers to uptake Basic GO service (since 1997) monthly (optional user-pays service) 39% dwelling units / flats GO Bin ownership relatively low (~65%) Split bin service collected weekly (by necessity) compared with opportunity for Councils with 3 bin systems to reduce effective volume of residual waste containers (fortnightly collections)
30
Recommendations Reduce residual waste collection frequency (reduced cost of collection offsets bio basket cost & ongoing bag costs) This also has the potential to: - increase diversion ratio (for each h/hold) and - increase participation (get more onboard) LG report available.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.