Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DETERMINING PRIMITIVE ROOTS by Christoph and John C. Witzgall September 15, 2015.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DETERMINING PRIMITIVE ROOTS by Christoph and John C. Witzgall September 15, 2015."— Presentation transcript:

1 DETERMINING PRIMITIVE ROOTS by Christoph and John C. Witzgall September 15, 2015

2 Divisors/Multipliers Integers will be capitalized. For A, B > 0, gcd(A, B) = greatest common divisor: W | A and W|B => W|gcd (A, B) lcm(A, B) = least common multiple A|W and B|W => lcm(A, B)|W (1) A, B are relatively prime gcd(A, B)=1 gcd(A, B) × lcm(A, B) = A×B

3 REDUCTION MODULO P>0 For P > 0, any integer X may be represented as X = S×P + r, 0 ≤ r < P, with r the remainder of X modulo P and S the value of integer (“long”) division of X by P. We say that X is reduced to r modulo P.

4 ARITHMETIC MODULO P>0 The reduction process is used to define the arithmetic modulo P. For remainders a, b between 0 and P-1, the operations a + b, a - b, a×b are evaluated using their integer face value, if necessary, reducing the results modulo P.

5 THE GROUP G P For P a prime, the remainders, 1, 2, 3, …, P–1 under multiplication modulo P form the group, G P our subject of interest.

6 CYCLES MODULO 7 1

7 1 2

8 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4

9 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4 8 -7

10 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4 1

11 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4 1 2

12 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4

13 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4 1 2 4 8 -7

14 CYCLES MODULO 7 1 2 4 1 2 4 1...

15 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1

16 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3

17 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 9 -7

18 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2

19 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6

20 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6 18 -14

21 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6 4

22 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6 4 12 -7

23 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6 4 5

24 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6 4 5 15 -14

25 CYCLES MODULO 7 (1 2 4) 1 3 2 6 4 5 1

26 CYCLES MODULO 7 C(2) = (1 2 4) C(3) = (1 3 2 6 5)3 = primitive root C(4) = (1 4 2) C(5) = (1 5 6 2 3) 5 = primitive root C(6) = (1 6)

27 GROUPS Groups considered here are finite and abelian. The notation |G| = “order of G” Means “number of elements.” Fundamentally, (2) N = |G| => a N = 1 for a Є G H ⊆ G => |H| divides |G|

28 CYCLES The cycle C(a) = (1, a, a 2, …, a N-1 ), a N = 1, encapsulates the period of a sequence of consecu- tive powers of an element a Є G. (3) N = |C(a)|, a R = 1 => N|R The entries in C(a) form a group. Such groups, generated by a single element are called cyclic.

29 SUBCYCLES Suppose N = ǀC(a)ǀ, KǀN, M = N/K. Then C(a K ) = (1 a K a 2K … ) is a subcycle of C(a). Its length is given by (4) Proposition: |C(a K )| = N/K = M Proof: a KM = a N = 1. If a KJ = 1 for 0 < J ≤ M then N|KJ. Thus M|J, so that J = M.

30 SPREADS Subgroups H 1, H 2 ⊂ G together generate what we call their spread H 1 ᴗ H 2 Spread H 1 H 2 Inter section

31 ORDERS OF SPREADS

32 COROLLARY

33 PRIMITIVE ROOTS (6) Primitive Root Theorem: G p is cyclic This means that G p may be generated by a single one of its elements. Each such generator is a primitive root of P. We propose: A constructive proof based on prime factorization of P-1 An algorithm for computing primitive roots.

34 APPROACH In what follows, we aim to prove the (7) Theorem: The spread of two cycles C(a) and C(b) in G P is cyclic by characterizing a generator x Є G P : __ C(a) ∪ C(b) = C(x) Successively collapsing pairs of cycles into single ones then yields a primitive root.

35 RELATIVELY PRIME CYCLES We call cycles C(a), C(b) in group G relatively prime if ǀC(a)ǀ, ǀC(b)ǀ are relatively prime. (8) Theorem: The spread of relatively prime cycles C(a) and C(b) is cyclic: C(a) ∪ C(b) = C(a×b). (Proof after the next slide.)

36 CONVENTION For what follows in this presentation, we are using the notation A = | C(a)|, B = | C(b)| for the orders of cycles C(a) and C(b).

37 PROOF OF THEOREM (8) By (5) and (1), |C(a) ∪ C(b)| = A ×B = lcm (A, B). For M > 0: (a×b) M = 1 a M = (b M ) -1 Є C(a) ∩ C(b) a M = b M = 1 A|M and B|M by (3) In other words, the exponent M = lcm(A, B) = A×B is the smallest positive exponent with (a×b) M = 1. Thus C(a) ∪ C(b) = C (a×b).

38 CYCLES MODULO 11 C(2) = (1 2 4 8 5 10 9 7 3 6) C(3) = (1 3 9 5 4) C(4) = (1 4 5 9 3) C(5) = (1 5 3 4 9) C(6) = (1 6 3 7 9 10 5 8 4 2) C(7) = (1 7 5 2 3 10 4 6 9 8) C(8) = (1 8 9 6 4 10 3 2 5 7) C(9) = (1 9 4 3 5) C(10) = ( 1 10) Cycles of equal lengths have the same elements.

39 LAGRANGE

40 CONSEQUENCES Recall A = |C(a)|, B = |C(b)|. In G P the statements: i. A|B C(a) ⊆ C(b) (10) ii. |C(a) ∩ C(b)| = gcd (A, B) iii. |C(a) ∪ C(b)| = lcm (A, B) are consequences of Lagrange (9).

41 SEPARATION We call U|A and V|B separators of A and B if (11) ( i) lcm(A/U, B/V) = lcm(A, B) ( ii) gcd(A/U, B/V) = 1 (12) Theorem: If U and V separate A and B, C(a) ∪ C(b) = C(a U × b V ).

42 Proof of Theorem 12 Proof: By (4), |C(a U )|=A/U, |C(b V )|=B/V. Thus by (10) |C(a) ∪ C(b)| = lcm(A,B) |C(a U ) ∪ C(b V )| = lcm(A/U, B/V) Yielding by (11.i), C(a) ∪ C(b) = C(a U ) ∪ C(b V ). As C(a U ) ⊆ C(a), C(b V ) ⊆ C(b), we have C(a) ∪ C(b) = C(a U ) ∪ C(b V ) By (11.i), C(a) and C(b) are relatively prime. By (8) C(a U ) ∪ C(b V ) = C(a U × b V ).

43 SEPARATOR PRODUCT

44 FACTORIZATION A = 120 B = 1260 The prime factors involved in both are 2, 3, 5, 7 Prime factorizations of A and B: A = 120 = 8 × 3 × 5 × 1 B = 1260 = 4 × 9 × 5 × 7 lcm(A, B) = 8 × 9 × 5 × 7 gcd(A, B) = 4 × 3 × 5 × 1

45 THE GIST A= 120 = 8 × 3 × 5 × 1 8 × 1 × 5 × 1 = 40 =A/U B=1260 = 4 × 9 × 5 × 7 1 × 9 × 1 × 7 = 63 =B/V U = 3 × 1 = 3, V = 4 × 5 = 20 Reducing the factors of lower multiplicity to 0 leaves lcm(A, B) unchanged, while reducing A by U and B by V, effecting separation.

46 Stepwise Separation

47 CUMULATIVE MULTIPLICATION

48 PARTIAL SEPARATOR (15) Theorem: With C = gcd(A, B), W = gcd(A/C, C) > 1 is a partial separator of A, B. Proof: In view of (14), it suffices to show that any prime divisor Q|W is a partial separator of A, B. The multiplicity, mult(Q|A), of Q in A exceeds mult(Q|C). Then gcd(Q, B/C) ≤ gcd(A/C, B/C) = 1, Implies gcd(Q, B/C) = 1 so that mult(Q|B) = mult(Q|C) < mult (Q|A). Thus gcd(A, B/Q) = gcd(A, B)/Q.

49 TERMINATION

50 EXAMPLE We revisit the 1.A = 120, B = 1260 C = gcd(A, B) = 60, A/C = 2 W = gcd(A/C, C) = gcd(2,60) = 2 2.A = 120, B = (B/2) = 630 C = gcd(A, B) = 30, A/C = 4 W = gcd(A/C, C) = gcd(4,30) = 2 3.A = 120, B = (B/2) = 315 C = gcd(A, B) = 15, A/C = 8 W = gcd(A/C, C) = gcd(8, 315) = 1 4. U = C = 15, V = 2 × 2 = 4

51 SEPARATION ALGORITHM Given: integer A, B > 0; Wanted: separators U,V. Step 1: 1 → V, gcd(A, B) → C Step 2: If C = 1 → step 7 Step 3: A/C → X Step 4: gcd (X, C) → W Step 5: If W = 1 → step 7 Step 6: V×W → V, C/W → C, X×W → X, → step 4 Step 7: C → U, → terminate

52 NUMBERS 1228 primes ≤ 10,000 primitive roots calculated 24% separation required 470 instances of primitive root = 2

53 Copies of this Power Point are available at the following link http://math.nist.gov/mcsd/Seminars/2015/2015-09-15- Witzgall.html http://math.nist.gov/mcsd/Seminars/2015/2015-09-15- Witzgall.html


Download ppt "DETERMINING PRIMITIVE ROOTS by Christoph and John C. Witzgall September 15, 2015."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google