Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byWarren Smith Modified over 9 years ago
1
Overview Why VLSI? Moore’s Law. Why FPGAs? Circuit Component
The system design process
2
Why VLSI? Integration improves the design Integration reduces
lower parasitics = higher speed lower power physically smaller Integration reduces Manufacturing cost-(almost) No manual assembly.
3
VLSI and you Microprocessors DRAM/SRAM/flash.
personal computers Microcontrollers DRAM/SRAM/flash. Audio/video and other consumer systems Telecommunications.
4
Moore’s Law Gordon Moore Predicted that
co-founder of Intel. Predicted that Number of transistors per chip would grow exponentially (double every 18 months) Exponential improvement in technology is a natural trend Example : steam engines, dynamos(電動機), automobiles.
5
Moore’s Law plot
6
The cost of fabrication
Current cost $2-3 billion. Typical fab line Occupies about 1 city block Employs a few hundred people New fabrication processes Require 6-8 month turnaround
7
Cost factors in ICs For large-volume ICs For low-volume ICs
packaging is largest cost testing is second-largest cost For low-volume ICs design costs may swamp all manufacturing costs $10 million-$20 million
8
Mask cost vs. line width
9
Field-programmable gate arrays
FPGAs are programmable logic devices Logic elements + interconnect. Provide multi-level logic. LE Interconnect network LE LE LE LE LE
10
FPGA design FPGA manufacturer System designer
Creates an FPGA fabric System designer Uses the fabric FPGA fabric design issues Study sample user designs Select interconnect topology Create logic element structures Design circuits, layout
11
FPGAs and VLSI FPGAs are standard parts VLSI (Custom silicon)
Pre-manufactured Don’t worry (much) about physical design VLSI (Custom silicon) Tailored to your application Generally lower power consumption and higher speed
12
FPGA vs. VLSI FPGA Pros FPGA Cons Have shorter design cycle
Have no manufacturing delay Reduce inventory FPGA Cons Slower Larger More power-hungry.
13
Circuit Component Using Component Representation Hierarchical name
Instantiating Representation Net lists Layout Stick diagram Transistor schematic Mixed schematic
14
Hierarchical name Interior view of a component
Components and wires that make it up Exterior view of a component type body pins cout Full adder sum a b cin
15
Component hierarchy top i1 xxx i2
16
Hierarchical names Typical hierarchical name: top/i1.foo component pin
17
Instantiating component types
Each instance has its own name add1 (type full adder) add2 (type full adder) Each instance is a separate copy of the type: cout Add1.a Add2.a Add2(Full adder) Add1(Full adder) sum sum a a b b cin cin
18
Net lists and component lists
net1: top.in1 in1.in net2: i1.out xxx.B topin1: top.n1 xxx.xin1 topin2: top.n2 xxx.xin2 botin1: top.n3 xxx.xin3 net3: xxx.out i2.in outnet: i2.out top.out Component list top: in1=net1 n1=topin1 n2=topin2 n3=topine out=outnet i1: in=net1 out=net2 xxx: xin1=topin1 xin2=topin2 xin3=botin1 B=net2 out=net3 i2: in=net3 out=outnet
19
Layout and its abstractions
Layout for dynamic latch:
20
Stick diagram
21
Transistor schematic
22
Mixed schematic inverter
23
System design Dealing with complexity Top-down vs. bottom-up design
Levels of abstraction
24
The system design process
May be part of larger product design. Major levels of abstraction specification; architecture; logic design; circuit design; layout. FPGA-based system design
25
Dealing with complexity
Divide-and-conquer Limit the number of components you deal with at any one time. Group several components into larger components transistors form gates gates form functional units functional units form processing elements etc.
26
Top-down vs. bottom-up design
Top-down design Adds functional detail. Create lower levels of abstraction from upper levels. Bottom-up design creates abstractions from low-level behavior. Good design Needs both top-down and bottom-up efforts
27
Design abstractions specification behavior function cost logic circuit
English Executable program Sequential machines Logic gates transistors rectangles specification Throughput, design time Function units, clock cycles Literals, logic depth nanoseconds microns behavior function cost register- transfer logic circuit layout
28
Levels of abstraction Specification Architecture Logic Circuits Layout
function, cost, etc Architecture large blocks Logic gates + registers Circuits transistor sizes for speed, power Layout determines parasitics
29
Circuit abstraction Continuous voltages and time
30
Logic (Digital) abstraction
Discrete levels, discrete time
31
Register-transfer abstraction
Abstract components, abstract data types: 0010 + 0001 + 0011 0100
32
Layout Abstraction Why do we care about layout? Layout determines
Logic delay Interconnect delay Energy consumption For FPGA We want to understand FPGA characteristics
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.