Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAlexander Charles Modified over 9 years ago
1
Is U.S. Manufacturing in Decline? Pop wisdom says Yes some evidence....
4
But these facts do not mean that American manufacturing output is declining absolutely or per- person....
6
Real Per-Capita Manufacturing Output in America 1970: $7,569 (2011 dollars) 2008: $11,687 (2011 dollars)
7
This happy trend is the result of steadily and dramatically improving productivity......
10
But would America’s manufacturing sector be even larger if low-wage foreign countries weren’t becoming so dominant in manufacturing?
13
Adam Smith: An Inquiry Into the Nature and CAUSES of the Wealth of Nations
14
Division of Labour *** -
15
Division of Labour By dividing labor, output in an 18th- century pin factory from from about 10 pins per worker per day to 4,800 pins per worker per day
16
WOW!
17
Why? 1. specialized workers don’t waste time moving from task to task
18
Why? 1. specialized workers don’t waste time moving from task to task 2. specialized workers hone their skills
19
Why? 1. specialized workers don’t waste time moving from task to task 2. specialized workers hone their skills 3. specialization more readily suggests practical means of mechanization
20
Specialization is the Key But specialization is the key for one other reason in addition to the three identified by Adam Smith
22
David Ricardo Vacations in Bath... and reads The Wealth of Nations
23
Principle of Comparative Advantage familiar (to economists) two-person, two-good ‘model’
24
Alone on an Island ------DONTOM FISH50200 BANANAS50100 Maximum Amounts Possible to Produce
25
Good Not to be Dependent Upon Others? ****DONTOM FISH25100 BANANAS2550 Amounts Produced AND Consumed
26
Let’s Trade Tom offers to give me 37 fish if I give him 25 bananas
27
Let’s Trade Some more simplifying assumptions: 1. Don’s fish and bananas are identical to Tom’s 2. Don and Tom are trustworthy 3. Don and Tom each want, with trade, to continue to consume the same number of bananas that each consumed without trade (that is, 25 bananas for Don and 50 bananas for Tom)
28
Specialization... ***DONTOM FISH0150 BANANAS5025 Amounts Produced with Trade
29
Amounts consumed with trade....
30
****DONTOM FISH BANANAS(50-25) = 25
31
****DONTOM FISH BANANAS (50-25) = 25 (25 + 25) = 50
32
****DONTOM FISH (0+37) = 37 BANANAS (50-25) = 25 (25+25) = 50
33
****DONTOM FISH (0+37) = 37 (150-37) = 113 BANANAS (50-25) = 25 (25+25) = 50 DonTomania is Wealthier by 25 fish!
34
With trade, each of us can consume more than each of us can produce!
35
With trade, each of us can consume MORE than each of us can produce!
36
A Parlor Trick? Not at all. Ask: What does It Cost me to produce a fish? A banana? Then ask: What does it cost Tom to produce a fish? A banana? If those costs are different, then there is the potential for mutual gains from trade
37
Tapping Into Each Other’s Talents: Our ProductionCosts Per Unit ****DONTOM FISH1 banana1/2 banana BANANA1 fish2 fish Don is the lower-cost bananaerererer... Tom is the lower-cost fisherman
38
Trade enables each of us to tap into the better talents of the other
39
Don wants fish and bananas and can produce his own fish at a cost of 1 banana. Because Tom also wants bananas yet can produce his own only at a cost of 2 fish, Tom figures out that, (1) because he (Tom) can produce a fish at a cost of 1/2 banana; (2) that Don wants fish; and that (3) Don’s cost of catching his own fish is 1 banana per fish - Tom realizes that he (Tom) can enable Don to profitably “produce” his (Don’) own fish by him (Don) first gathering bananas (at a cost of 1 fish per banana) and then trading each of those bananas to Tom in exchange for more than one fish (say, 1.5 fish per banana).
40
The result of Don getting from Tom 1.5 fish for each banana that Don produces and exchanges is that each fish that Don “produces” in this way cost him only 2/3rds (or 0.67ths) of a banana.
41
Any ratio of exchange (“price”) of fish for bananas that has fish fetching at least slightly more than 1/2 banana yet no more than 1 banana is mutually advantageous. The reason is that Tom’s cost of producing each fish is 1/2 of a banana, and Don can produce his own fish at a cost of 1 banana
42
Smith and Ricardo Together ****DONTOM FISH50300 BANANAS50100 Tom’s Concentration on fishing makes him a better fisherman
43
But Tom’s becoming a better fisherman makes him a worse bananaerererer.... That is, each banana now costs Tom 3 fish to produce rather than 2 fish
44
And Tom’s becoming a better fisherman also makes me a relatively better bananaerererer.... That is, whereas before I could produce bananas at 1/2 the cost that Tom incurred to produce bananas, Now I can produce bananas at 1/3 the cost that Tom incurs to produce bananas.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.