Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byPaula Washington Modified over 9 years ago
1
Increasing Mediation Effectiveness: When is it appropriate? What makes it work? Access To Justice Conference William S. Richardson School of Law John Barkai, Chuck Hurd, Elizabeth Kent, Tracey Wiltgen June 25, 2010
2
www2.hawaii.edu/~barkai Google: John Barkai
3
Pray one hour before going to war, Two hours before going to sea, Three hours before getting married, …. - Indian Proverb – (modified)
4
Pray one hour before going to war, Two hours before going to sea, Three hours before getting married, (and four hours before going to court). - Indian Proverb – (modified)
5
Mediation is assisted negotiation
6
NO POWER The mediator has no power to decide the dispute
7
Models of Mediation
9
Pepperdine STAR Model of mediation
10
S - stage T – task (what) A – action (how) R - result
11
StageTask(what)Action(how)Result Convening Opening Communicating Negotiating Closing
12
MCP NJC David Chandler Diamond 2 Triangles
13
Mediation has a Focus on the Future
14
“ Do not find fault, find a remedy. ” -- Henry Ford
16
FACILITATIVE EVALUATIVE Styles of Mediation
17
FACILITATIVE mediators do NOT offer opinions or suggest solutions EVALUATIVE mediators evaluate by offering opinions & suggesting solutions TRANSFORMATIVE mediators are not concerned about solutions. They want to “empower” and “transform” the parties. USPS Community Lawyers USPS
18
Facilitative mediators ASK Evaluative mediators TELL
19
A Mediator's View of the Bargaining Process 1. Develop a relationship with the parties 2. Get the parties unstuck - shift to “interests” not “positions” focus, or/and - get the first new money offer 3. Move the bargaining along - generate significant movements 4. Close the gap - beyond the old bottom lines
20
Why should you use mediation? Compared to litigation - Faster - Cheaper - Private - confidential - Less formal - Parties remain in control of their dispute Traditional reasons
21
Why should you use mediation? The truth is … You are stuck Virtually all psychology principles work against negotiators to make them over- value their case Many negotiators need a mediator’s help overcoming strategic barriers to successful negotiations
24
Plaintiff’s View of the CaseDefendant’s View of the Case
25
“Even a sheet of paper has two sides” Japanese Proverb
26
傍目八目 Okame Hachimoku (Japanese proverb) The onlookers see more than the players. Japanese
27
ABA Task Force on Improving Mediation Quality Goldberg & Shaw - Successful and Unsuccessful Mediators Goodman-Loftus - Study on Lawyer Overconfidence $65$45-70 $30-45
28
American Bar Association’s Section of Dispute Resolution Task Force on Improving Mediation Quality 2008
29
Task Force on Improving Mediation Quality (civil disputes with lawyers) Preparation Customization Evaluation Skills Persistence
30
Goldberg & Shaw 2005 & 2007 Traits of Successful and Unsuccessful Mediators n= 30 mediators n=216 advocates
31
Study 1 "How do you account for your success as a mediator? “ 75% said: Ability to develop RAPPORT with the disputing parties Develop a relationship of understanding, empathy, and trust
32
Why is that so important? Encourages the parties to communicate more fully with the mediator, often providing the mediator with the information the mediator needs to help the parties craft a settlement
33
How to build that relationship? Empathic listening, which conveys the message that the mediator truly cares about the parties' feelings, needs, and concerns ( substantial majority ) The mediator’s reputation for being honest, ethical, and trustworthy ( some mediators )
34
How do you account for your success as a mediator? Ability to gain the parties’ confidence75% Ability to gain the parties’ confidence75% Friendly/empathic 75 % Friendly/empathic 75 % Honesty/integrity25% Honesty/integrity25% Ability to generate novel or creative solutions50% Ability to generate novel or creative solutions50% Patient, tenacious, never quit15% Patient, tenacious, never quit15% Sense of humor15% Sense of humor15% Understand the rhythm of a mediation;10% Understand the rhythm of a mediation;10% know when to put pressure on the parties know when to put pressure on the parties Assist the parties to understand others’ needs10% Assist the parties to understand others’ needs10% Maintaining an outwardly optimistic attitude10% Maintaining an outwardly optimistic attitude10% Focus the parties on the consequences of not10% Focus the parties on the consequences of not10% settling ; predict the likely result of trial settling ; predict the likely result of trial
35
Study 2 Lawyers & Parties – What lead to success? Mediator’s ability to gain the parties’ confidence (friendly, empathic, likable, etc.) Mediator’s ability to gain the parties’ confidence (friendly, empathic, likable, etc.) Mediator’s high integrity (Honesty, neutrality, trustworthiness, protection of confidences, etc.) Mediator’s high integrity (Honesty, neutrality, trustworthiness, protection of confidences, etc.) Mediator - smart, well-prepared, knew the law Mediator - smart, well-prepared, knew the law
36
Shaw-Goldberg – Study 2 Views of reasons for mediator success Shaw-Goldberg – Study 2 Views of reasons for mediator success AdvocatesMediators CONFIDENCE BUILDING ATTRIBUTES: Friendly, empathic, likeable, relates to all, respectful, conveys sense of caring, wants to find solutions 60%75% High integrity, respects confidences, non- judgmental 53%25% EVALUATIVE SKILLS: Useful reality testing, evaluates likely outcome; candid 33%10% PROCESS SKILLS: Patient, persistent, never quits 35%15% Proposes solutions, creative 18%50%
37
Study 3 Why did mediators fail? Lack of confidence-building attributes Lack of confidence-building attributes Lack of process skills Lack of process skills Lack of evaluation skills Lack of evaluation skills
38
INSIGHTFUL or WISHFUL: Lawyers’ Ability to Predict Case Outcomes Goodman-Delahunty, Hartwig, Granhag, & Loftus 16 Psychology, Public Policy & Law, No. 2, 1–157 (2010) Lawyer’s are overconfident predicting trial outcomes Lawyer’s are overconfident predicting trial outcomes Greater confidence greater overconfidence Greater confidence greater overconfidence Accuracy did not improve with experience Accuracy did not improve with experience Men were more overconfident than women Men were more overconfident than women Predicting Trial Outcomes
39
Prof. John Barkai William S. Richardson School of Law University of Hawaii
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.