Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

America’s Major Metropolitan Areas in the 2000s Big City Density and Sun Belt Sprawl.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "America’s Major Metropolitan Areas in the 2000s Big City Density and Sun Belt Sprawl."— Presentation transcript:

1 America’s Major Metropolitan Areas in the 2000s Big City Density and Sun Belt Sprawl

2 Agenda Recapping A Decade in a Few Minutes Metro Areas, the Census and American Community Survey Population Changes in the 2000s Differences on Transportation Income Poverty

3 During the 2000s… America grew in several ways* Suburbs 12% population growth Central cities 7% population growth Some see an economic revitalization in areas beyond “Downtown” More than twice as many people live in suburbs vs. central cities *Sources: Brookings Institute, State of Metropolitan America Map, New York Times, Mapping America: Every City, Every Block and SustainableCitiesCollective (blog), “New Census numbers confirm the resurgence of cities”, December 15, 2010,Brookings Institute, State of Metropolitan America Map New York Times, Mapping America: Every City, Every BlockNew Census numbers confirm the resurgence of cities

4 During the 2000s… Mid-decade economic boom driven by real estate… which busts in 2007-2008 Properties de-value, foreclosures rise Greatest impact felt in Several of the fastest growing metro areas “Exurbs” – areas relatively far from central cities “Drive ‘til You Qualify”

5 Escalating Gas Prices

6 During the 2000s… Budgets are squeezed Gas prices drive up transportation costs (among other things) Declining property values and ballooning mortgage interest rates Poverty rate grows faster in suburbs than in central cities * Real wages fall more among suburban households* *Source: Brookings Institute, State of Metropolitan America MapBrookings Institute, State of Metropolitan America Map

7 Major Cities Are Dense, Sun Belt Less So

8 High Growth Rate in Sun Belt

9 Metro Area Trends Differences between higher density metros of America’s major cities and lower density, high growth metros in the Sun Belt Transportation Primary commuting alternatives to driving alone Income levels Poverty rates County-level trends within these two sets

10 54 Metro Areas with 1 Million People or Greater* Metro Areas AtlantaCleveland-AkronIndianapolisMinneapolis-St. PaulPittsburghSan Antonio AustinColumbusJacksonvilleNashvillePortland, ORSan Diego Baltimore (Part of Washington, DC - 1999 MSA) Dallas-Fort WorthKansas CityNew OrleansProvidence San Francisco-Oakland (1999 MSA includes San Jose) BirminghamDenver-BoulderLas VegasNew York City Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill San Jose (Part of San Francisco-Oakland - 1999 MSA) Boston-WorcesterDetroit-Ann Arbor-Flint Los Angeles (1999 MSA includes Riverside-San Bernardino) Norfolk-Virginia Beach RichmondSeattle-Tacoma BuffaloGrand Rapids-MuskegonLouisvilleOklahoma City Riverside-San Bernardino (Part of Los Angeles - 1999 MSA) St. Louis Charlotte Greensboro-High Point- Winston Salem MemphisOrlandoRochester, NYTampa-St. Petersburg ChicagoHartford Miami-Fort Lauderdale- West Palm Beach (West Palm Beach separate MSA in 1999) PhiladelphiaSacramentoTucson CincinnatiHoustonMilwaukeePhoenixSalt Lake City Washington, DC (1999 MSA includes Baltimore) *2000 Census based on 1999 MSA definitions, or 2007-2009 American Community Survey based on 2003 CBSA definitions

11 Change in Metro Area Definition Federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defines Metro Areas Revised in 2003* Previously – Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) Commuting relationship between central city and surrounding counties New – Core Based Statistical Area (CBSA) Examine commuting patterns between counties Urban core – ‘central city’ or several communities # of metropolitan areas grew from 280 to 362 Suburbs of large MSAs split off Areas are smaller, but likely more dense Pop density figures in 2012 when metro area data for 2010 Census is released *Source - Office of Management and Budget, Standards for Defining Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas; Notice, Federal Register, Vol. 65, No. 249, 12/27/00

12 1999 (MSA) and 2003 (CBSA) Metro Areas

13 2000 Census and 2007-2009 ACS 2000 Census Entire population 1/6 of households –survey on housing and economic status (discontinued for 2010 in favor of ACS) Metro Area statistics CBSA – population count MSA – population density and characteristics American Community Survey (ACS) Surveys 2 million households each year, official since 2005 Similar to longer-form 2000 census survey 3-year average reduces margin of error Info on geographic areas with pop. of 20K or greater (annual info for areas with pop. of 65K or greater) Limitation - economic and social change during time period CBSA - all metro area data Overcame differences with 2000 Census by looking at county-level data

14 Population Changes In the 2000s

15 High Growth Rate in Sun Belt

16 Strong Growth – Suburbs of Sun Belt Metros

17 Strong Growth – Suburbs of Sun Belt Metros…

18 …Which Are Low Density In 2000, Indicating Sprawl

19 Differences between Higher and Lower Density Metros

20 Rail Offers Transportation Alternative in Major Cities

21 Less Public Transit Use in Sun Belt…

22 …So Carpooling is More Prevalent

23 Denser Major Cities Are Among Highest HH Incomes

24 Sun Belt Tends To Have Lower Per-Capita Income

25 Higher Poverty Rates Common In Sun Belt

26 Poverty Strong In Sun Belt Cities and Suburbs

27 Incomes Also Lower In Sun Belt Suburbs

28 Suburban Poverty Grows At A Faster Rate

29

30 In Summary Denser metro areas of our major cities may have slower growth rates, but Higher incomes Lower poverty rates Extensive rail networks help lessen auto-dependency Sun Belt – High growth, lower density Sprawling Auto-dependent Lower incomes Growing suburban poverty As transportation costs increase, could residents find themselves isolated from jobs? Some regions taking action

31 Sun Belt Regions Adding Transit Sprawling development patterns limits reach of these systems *Source: Federal Transit Administration, National Transit Database, Glossary; Websites of transportation agencies in above-mentioned cities and regionsFederal Transit Administration, National Transit Database, Glossary

32 Fed Policy Initiatives HUD, DOT and EPA Partnership for Sustainable Communities 1 Grants to 45 regions in December, 2010, including agencies in Austin, Greensboro and Houston Development of joint sustainability, affordable housing and transit plans 1 Partnership for Sustainable Communities Website, www.sustainablecommunities.govwww.sustainablecommunities.gov

33 Thank You!


Download ppt "America’s Major Metropolitan Areas in the 2000s Big City Density and Sun Belt Sprawl."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google