Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySilas Rogers Modified over 9 years ago
1
EEG analysis during hypnagogium Petr Svoboda Laboratory of System Reliability Faculty of Transportation Czech Technical University e-mail: svobodap@spel.cz
2
Presented methods Traditional methods Fourier transform Parametrical methods Autoregressive estimator Nonlinear methods - Chaos theory Delay-time embedding, Correlation dimension, Takens estimator, State Space dimension, Lyapunov exponents
3
EEG activity electric potential of brain‘s neural activity registered on the skelet four basic frequencies
4
Traditional methods Signal‘s stationarity frequency resolution leakage of frequency spectra quality of the spectral estimate phase of the signal is lost Potencial problems Estimate of a periodogram using the Fourier transform
5
Parametric model Autoregressive (AR) model: Approximation of an EEG signal by adequate parametric model Approximation of an EEG signal by linear time invariant filter with transfer function H(z)=1/A(z) Whitening of signal by AR filter:
6
Analyzed signal Pole placementAutocovariance function Spectral estimate
7
Comparison of traditional and parametric methods Parametric methods: + frequency resolution + parametric description of analyzed signal - estimate of AR model order - high noise sensitivity Traditional methods: + low noise sensitivity - frequency resolution
8
Microsleep classification + Alpha, deltha and theta activity of spectral estimate Traditional methods Parametrical methods + Alpha, deltha and theta activity of spectral estimate - estimate of AR model order - placement of poles in a complex plane
9
Classification by spectral estimate Classification into 2 states RELAXATION DROWSINESS Classification based on neural network (back propagation) Classical methods: accuracy of about 87% Parametrical methods: accuracy of about 90%
10
Relaxation Drowsiness
12
Chaos theory analysis of dynamic deterministic systems high sensitivity on initial conditions known dynamics and phase of the system detecting nonlinearity by surrogate data testing delay-time embedding state-space dimension estimate estimate of delay time estimate of fractal dimension D 2 Takens estimator for D 2 dimension largest Lyapunov exponents
13
Delay-time embedding S i =[x(i),x(i+L),… x(i+(m-1)L)] L… time delay S i … state-space vector m… state dimension x… analyzed signal
14
Selection of Delay Time L Time delay should be set so, x(i),x(i+L),… are independent autocorrelation method method of Mutual Information (MI)
15
Fractal dimension & Takens estimator Fractal dimension is a measure of complexity of the analyzed signal D 2 = log C(r) / log r Where C(r) is correlation integral D 2 computed by maximum likelihood estimator is known as Takens estimator
16
Microsleep classification + matematical description of state-space trajectory reconstruction nonlinearity detection - correlation dimension D 2 estimate + Takens estimator + largest Lyapunov exponents Chaos theory
18
Largest Lyapunov Exponents Sensitive dependence on initial conditions
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.