Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDominick Patterson Modified over 9 years ago
1
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session HOM measurement and analysis S. Weathersby, A. Novokhatski HOMs in LER region 4: overview, history Collimator wake fields Design of HOM selective absorber Experimental results LER abort spoiler investigations IP Q2 bellows
2
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Region 4 overview and history LER region 4 straight to arc transition temperatures unusually high: bellows, valves, pumps Burned antechamber TSP feedthru indicated HOMs coupling into accelerator components Temperature response to beam position at upstream collimator (10-15 meters away) Installed water cooled absorber in TSP pump chamber
3
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session RF cavities 100 m TFB & LFB kickers 50 m Collimator 15 m HOMs in region 4
4
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Hot spots and diagnostics
5
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Antechamber absorber
6
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Recent developments Collimator wake field studies indicate presence of traveling waves: predominately dipole and quadrupole Design of selective HOM absorber: Intercept and dissipate harmful modes. Minimize beam impedance. Selective HOM absorber built and installed. Experimental data is encouraging
7
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session downstream upstream Downstream electric field snapshots after bunch has passed 1.3 cm, 14 nC Gaussian bunch length ~0.6 m height ~ 3 cm Collimator wake fields downstream MAFIA Time domain
8
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session downstream upstream Power propagation follows bunch Beam arrival
9
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session How do we remove HOMs? The selective HOM absorber (trap) Devise a means to intercept traveling dipole/quadrupole HOMs before arc transition. Avoid disruption to beam image currents (monopole) Safely dissipate absorbed EM energy Ceramic tiles Coupling slots
10
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session p1p2 FT Normalize to 1in Dipole mode example cuttoff Scattering parameters s 11, s 21 Port signals Analysis 1out/1in=s11 2out/1in=s21
11
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Optimal design Slot length: 70 mm Slot width: 6 mm Absorber thickness: 16.7 mm Slot length affects degree of coupling Slot width broadens spectra Absorber thickness lowers peak frequencies
12
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Experimental results Mechanical design and installation Experimental data Ceramic absorbing tiles Coupling slots Bellows cavity coupled to absorber Water cooling
13
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Tiles braised to water cooled copper support columns Ready for install Production
14
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Installation May 17, 2006
15
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Selective absorber installed 15 m More current, half the HOM heating
16
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session 20 m Other bellows A
17
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Valve temperatures 14 m
18
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session 20 m A At burned antechamber site
19
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Power at antechamber absorber
20
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Region 4 HOM Summary HOMs from collimators propagate large distances and infiltrate beam line structures with harmful RF energy Dipole and quadrupole modes predominate Selective absorber designed to specifically remove dipole and quadrupole HOM power from the beam chamber while presenting minimal disruption to beam image currents Selective absorber built and installed. Reduction in downstream temperature profiles
21
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session LER abort spoiler investigations Diffuse aborted beam to protect abort window Large power measured during x4 bucket pattern at 500 mA (stored beam) Recent inspection revealed significant HOM damage
22
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Melted Ti
23
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Spoiler “trapped” mode 0.539 GHz Q factor 1097 r =30, loss tangent 0.11, r =1 absorbs E fields Copper chamber and Ti spoiler 2mm wide spoiler 476 MHz/4*5=.595 GHz -> close to by4 Electric field 464 304
24
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Magnetic field near base of spoiler and tiles Magnetic field Vs/M 2 1.4e-7 6.7e-7
25
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Surface currents
26
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Power loss density W/M 2 High power loss density on the edge
27
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Power loss density VA/M 2 Spoiler edge effect Magnetic field
28
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Shorter spoiler: 5 cm,. 0.62 GHz More field near absorber. Q lower by factor of 2 Shorter spoiler 7cm -> 5 cm Electric field
29
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session LER spoiler Summary Trapped mode has observed power loss profile 50 MHz from by 4 frequency. 1 cm Mainly magnetic field at absorber location (lossy Ferrite?) Current density high on outer edges. Change profile. Length effects: 7 cm=.54 GHz, 5 cm=.62 GHz. Factor of 2 lower Q Increasing resistance ~factor of 2 Q decrease. (A. Kulikov) Increasing conductance raises Q dangerously. Change length to avert resonance Stay away from by4 Graphite spoiler
30
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session Existing Q2 bellows absorption
31
26-October-2006 PEP-II MAC Session New proposal
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.