1. RTI and Behavior Process Improvement Group Facilitators: Bill Trant, Susan Cole, & Leigh Gates

2. Agenda – Presentation of the Data – Description of the Process – What Works? Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share – What Needs to Work Better? Small Group Discussion & Whole Group Share – Wrap-up

3. THE STATE-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE The Continuous Improvement Performance Plan Indicator 4b Indicators 9 and 10

4. Indicator 4b Significant Discrepancy of > 10 Day Suspensions by Race/Ethnicity Due to 2009-2010 Data – 1,073 total students suspended – 78 (7.3%) students with IEPs – More than 2 times discrepant in the number of suspensions by race/ethnicity (African American)

5. Indicator 9 & 10 Disproportionate Representation by Race/Ethnicity in Disability Categories That is a Result of Inappropriate Identification 2010-2011 Data – 2 categories: ID-MI (82/133) and SED (63/105). – ID-MI risk ratio: 6.2% NHCS > 5.36% State – SED risk ratio: 6% NHCS > 5% State – Disproportionate in the identification of African American students in these two categories

6. THE DISTRICT-LEVEL PERSPECTIVE RTI from a system perspective A break down of data in terms of Behavior Intervention A break down of Behavior Intervention in terms of Tiers

7. Entitlement Data 05-06 17 06-07 71 07-08 106 08-09 127 09-10 154 10-11 222

8. Entitlements by Behavior State Child Count (SED/Total)= 4% 05-06 17 0 At: 0 Ag: 0 2 B: 0 06-07 71 B:4(5.63%) At: 3 Ag: 1 2 B: 0 07-08 106 B:4(3.77%) At: 3 Ag: 1 2 B: 0 08-09 127 B:5(2.36%) At: 1 Ag: 3 2 B: 1 09-10 154 B:22(6.49%) At: 7 Ag: 9 2 B: 6 09-10 222 B:21(4.05%) At: 7 Ag: 8 2 B: 6 KEY: B= Behavior; At= Entitled in Attention; Ag: Entitled in Aggression; 2 B= Entitled in 2 Behaviors

9. K-5 Students Provided Interventions in Tiers 2009-2010 3,501* (30% ADM) in RTI 1,696 (48%) intervention info. 639** (38%) cases = behavior 539 * (84%) tier information 2010-2011 * Based on 25 schools **Based on 25 sch. w/3-4 w/<50% of data 89 (17%) 193 (36%) 237 (37%) 3 (1%) 4 2 1 3 3,250* (29% ADM) in RTI 1,261 (39%) intervention info. 345** (27%) cases = behavior 292 * (85%) tier information * Based on 25 schools **Based on 20 sch. w/8-9 w/<50% of data 51 (17%) 122 (42%) 112 (38%) 7 (2%) 4 2 1 3

10. 6-8 Students Provided Interventions in Tiers 2009-2010 418* (8% ADM) in RTI 197 (47%) intervention info. 24** (12%) cases = behavior 24* (100%) tier information 2010-2011 * Based on 7 schools **Based on 7 sch. w/2 w/<50% of data 0 (0%) 17 (71%) 6 (25%) 1 (4%) 4 2 1 3 907* (17% ADM) in RTI 401 (44%) intervention info. 71** (18%) cases = behavior 63* (89%) tier information * Based on 7 schools **Based on 5 sch. w/3 w/<50% of data 12 (19%) 14 (22%) 36 (57%) 1 (2%) 4 2 1 3