Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

 A Case For Interaction: A Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness By Jürgen Koenemann and Nicholas J. Belkin (1996) John.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: " A Case For Interaction: A Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness By Jürgen Koenemann and Nicholas J. Belkin (1996) John."— Presentation transcript:

1  A Case For Interaction: A Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness By Jürgen Koenemann and Nicholas J. Belkin (1996) John Clougherty1 Presented by John Clougherty

2 Experiment to Measure Effectiveness of Relevance Feedback and User Interaction John Clougherty2

3 Relevance Feedback and User Interaction Improves Retrieval Effectiveness  Relevance feedback increased retrieval effectiveness  Increased user interaction with relevance feedback made interactions more efficient John Clougherty3

4 Exponential Number of New Users are Gaining Access to IR Tools  Information is everywhere and it’s availability is growing rapidly  Anyone with a Computer/Smartphone/Tablet can use Bing to Google something  New users have none or minimal training John Clougherty4

5 Increase in Computerized Tools to Support User’s Information Need  User’s have an information need  Search engines are designed to provide that information need  Improvements in search engines are being developed every day  Speed, Best-match, Relevance, Flexibility, Push and Pull John Clougherty5

6 Novice IR System Users Perform Query Reformulation  INQUERY System  Novice Users  2000 Documents  Two Topics  Precision@30 and Recall John Clougherty6

7 Four Levels of Information Retrieval System 2. Opaque  Hidden Effect of Relevance Feedback  No User Interaction John Clougherty7 4. Penetrable  Visible Effect of Relevance Feedback  User Interaction with Feedback 1. Baseline  No Relevance Feedback 3. Transparent  Visible Effect of Relevance Feedback  No User Interaction

8 Penetrable System Performed Best for Precision@30 and Number of Iterations John Clougherty8

9 Relevance Feedback is Heavily Utilized but User Interaction is Minimal  Directly or Indirectly obtained by the user  Most relevance feedback algorithms are done implicitly  User interaction has yet to be implemented in a big way John Clougherty9

10 Sources  https://d3gyq8wptu1by3.cloudfront.net/media/93f12bdd-7774-4810-a210- 33f1aec03e68.jpg  http://assets.inhabitat.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2013/08/Iron-Man-Movie- Prologue-Hologram-2.jpg  http://communicationscopilot.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Bar-graph-growth- chart-300x300.jpg  http://www.darkgovernment.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/internet-spy.jpg  http://www.pouted.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/baby_computer.jpg  http://www.sigchi.org/chi96/proceedings/papers/Koenemann/jk1_txt.htm John Clougherty10

11 John Clougherty11 Thank You


Download ppt " A Case For Interaction: A Study of Interactive Information Retrieval Behavior and Effectiveness By Jürgen Koenemann and Nicholas J. Belkin (1996) John."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google