Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Slide 1 Descriptive Analysis Using Minitab. Slide 2 S/N Ratio.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Slide 1 Descriptive Analysis Using Minitab. Slide 2 S/N Ratio."— Presentation transcript:

1 Slide 1 Descriptive Analysis Using Minitab

2 Slide 2 S/N Ratio

3 Slide 3 Note The Nominal is Best (default) S/N ratio is good for analyzing or identifying scaling factors, which are factors in which the mean and standard deviation vary proportionally. Scaling factors can be used to adjust the mean on target without affecting S/N ratios.

4 Slide 4 Larger the better (golf ball case) You manufacture golf balls and are working on a new design to maximize ball flight distance. You have identified four control factors, each with two levels: Core material (liquid vs. tungsten) Core diameter (118 vs. 156) Number of dimples (392 vs. 422) Cover thickness (.03 vs..06) You also want to test the interaction between core material and core diameter.

5 Slide 5 The response is ball flight distance in feet. The noise factor is two types of golf clubs: driver and a 5-iron. You measure distance for each club type, resulting in two noise factor columns in the worksheet. Because your goal is to maximize flight distance, you select the larger-is-better signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio.

6 Slide 6 1 Open the worksheet GOLFBALL.MTW. The design and response data have been saved for you. 2 Choose Stat > DOE > Taguchi > Analyze Taguchi Design. 3 In Response data are in, enter Driver and Iron. 4 Click Analysis. 5 Under Fit linear model for, check Signal-to-noise ratios and Means. Click OK. 6 Click Terms. 7 Move the term AB to Selected Terms by using the arrow keys or double-clicking it. Click OK. 8 Click Options. 9 Under Signal to Noise Ratio, choose Larger is better. Click OK in each dialog box.

7 Slide 7 Data Material (KOLOM A) Diameter (KOLOM B) Dimples (KOLOM D) Thickness (KOLOM E) Driver (Ulangan 1) Iron (Ulangan 2) Liquid1183920.03247.5234.3 Liquid1184220.06224.4214.5 Liquid1563920.0359.449.5 Liquid1564220.0675.972.6 Tungsten1183920.06155.1148.5 Tungsten1184220.0339.629.7 Tungsten1563920.0692.482.5 Tungsten1564220.0321.918.6

8 Slide 8

9 Slide 9

10 Slide 10

11 Slide 11 For this example, because your goal is to increase ball flight distance, you want factor levels that produce the highest mean. In Taguchi experiments, you always want to maximize the S/N ratio. The level averages in the response tables show that the S/N ratios and the means were maximized when the core was liquid, the core diameter was 118, there were 392 dimples, and the cover thickness was.06. Examining the main effects plots and interaction plots confirms these results. The interaction plot shows that, with the liquid core, the flight distance is maximized when the core diameter is 118. Based on these results, you should set the factors at: MaterialLiquid Diameter118 Dimples392 Thickness.06

12 Slide 12 Predicted values : S/N Ratio 53.6844 Mean 276.263 Factor levels for predictions Material Liquid Diameter 118 Dimples 392 Thickness 0.06 Interpreting the results For the factor settings you selected, the S/N ratio is predicted to be 53.6844 and the mean (the average ball flight distance) is predicted to be 276 yards. Next, you might run an experiment using these factor settings to test the accuracy of the model.

13 Slide 13

14 Slide 14 Interpreting the Results - Predicting Results The predicted results for the chosen factor settings are: S/N ratio of 33.8551, mean of 17.5889, and standard deviation of 0.439978. Next, you might run an experiment using these factor settings to test the accuracy of the model The predicted values for the standard deviation and log of the standard deviation use different models of the data.

15 Slide 15 Latihan Diketahui karakteristik kualitas bersifat larger-the-better. Respon adalah pull- off force yang akan dimaksimumkan. Buatkan grafik respon dari SN ratio untuk keempat factor yang dicobakan serta tentukan nilai prediksi SN.

16 Slide 16 Factors and Levels for Tube Control FactorsLevels A. InterferenceLowMedHigh B. Wall ThicknessThinMedThick C. Insertion DepthShal.MedHigh D. % adhesiveLowMedHigh Noise FactorsLevels E. Time24 h120 h F. Temp72F150F G. RH25%75%

17 Slide 17 Control FactorsNoise Treatment Combinati onABCDE1F1G1E1F2G2E2F1G2E2F2G1 1(A1B1C 1D1)111115.619.919.620 2(A1B2C 2D2)12221519.619.824.2 3133316.315.618.223.3 4212318.318.618.923.2 5223119.725.121.427.5 6231216.219.819.622.5 7313216.423.618.624.3 8321314.216.819.623.3 9332116.117.322.722.6


Download ppt "Slide 1 Descriptive Analysis Using Minitab. Slide 2 S/N Ratio."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google