Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Designing Neutralized Drift Compression for Focusing of Intense Ion Beam Pulses in Background Plasma
I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf, E. A. Startsev, A. B. Sefkow Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory J. J. Barnard, A. Friedman, E. P. Lee, S.M. Lidia, B. G. Logan, P. K. Roy, P. A. Seidl Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory D. R. Welch Voss Scientific

2 Longitudinal velocity tilt – by inductive tilt core
Neutralized drift compression can reach 300x300 = 105 combined longitudinal and transverse compression of ion beam pulse. Radial velocity tilt is applied by magnetic lenses Longitudinal velocity tilt – by inductive tilt core PHYSICS OF NEUTRALIZED DRIFT COMPRESSION FOR FOCUSING OF INTENSE BEAM PULSES IN BACKGROUND PLASMA Neutralized drift compression offers effective way of particle beam focusing and current amplification. The beam intensity can be increased more than 100 times in both radial and longitudinal directions, totaling more than 10,000 times increase in the beam density during this process. Experimental results and challenges will be discussed. Optimal configuration of focusing elements to mitigate time-dependant focal plane will be discussed. Self-electric and magnetic fields can prevent tight ballistic focusing and have to be reduced by supplying neutralizing electrons. We present a survey of the present numerical modeling techniques and theoretical understanding of plasma neutralization of intense particle beams. Theory predicts that there is a sizable enhancement of the self-electric and self-magnetic fields due to the dynamo effect in presence of solenoidal magnetic field. The dynamo effect occurs due to the induced electron rotation, which twists the applied magnetic field and generates a self-magnetic field that is much larger than in the limit with no applied magnetic field. Excitation of helicon or whistler waves by the beam results in very complicated patterns of self-magnetic and electric field. Ferroelectric plasma source Vacuum arc source

3 Outline Longitudinal compression Radial compression
Simultaneous longitudinal and radial compression The physics of the neutralization process and requirements for plasma sources. Collective excitations in intense beam pulses propagating through background plasma Igor Kaganovich Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ 08543 Propagation of an intense charged particle beam pulse through a background plasma is a common problem in astrophysics and accelerator applications. The plasma can effectively neutralize the charge and current of the beam pulse, and thus provides a convenient medium for beam transport. Neutralized drift compression offers an effective means of particle beam focusing and current amplification. Self-electric and magnetic fields can prevent tight ballistic focusing and have to be reduced by supplying neutralizing electrons. The speaker will present a survey of some numerical modeling techniques and of the current theoretical understanding of plasma neutralization of intense particle beams. Theory predicts that there is a sizable enhancement of the self-electric and self-magnetic fields due to the dynamo effect in the presence of a solenoidal magnetic field. The dynamo effect occurs due to the induced electron rotation, which twists the applied magnetic field and generates a self-magnetic field that is much larger than that obtained with no applied magnetic field. Excitation of helicon or whistler waves by the beam results in very complicated patterns of self-magnetic and electric fields. Weibel instability (filamentation) of intense ion and electron beams will be described in details with particular attention to processes during filaments merger, which can lead to the magnetic field dissipation and plasma heating.

4 Longitudinal Compression
beam pulse before compression tilt core voltage waveform applied to uncompressed beam pulse Z,  compressed beam current. Analytical solution nb(z,t)=nb0vb0/[vb()-(t-)dvb()] z(t, )= vb() (t-) P.K. Roy et al, NIMPR. A 577, 223 (2007).

5 Longitudinal compression is limited by errors in applied velocity tilt.
Max(nb/nb0)= vb/vb No plasma Experimental and ideal voltage waveforms. Beam compression (experiment and simulation). P.K. Roy et al, NIMPR. A (2007). 1cm (a) (b) Analytical solution nb(z,t)=nb0vb0/[vb()-(t-)dvb()] z(t, )= vb() (t-)

6 Radial Compression is emittance limited, degree of neutralization >99%.
plasma Final focus With Without Beam envelope with and without taking into account beam space charge. Beam images at the focal plane 24mA, 254 keV K+ ion beam: (a) without plasma (b) with plasma. (a) (b) P.K. Roy et al, NIMPR. A 544, 225 (2005).

7 Aberration in the bunching module
acceleration gap of the induction bunching module. The static and dynamic aberrations for NDCX-I. Pulse tp=400ns, Eb=300keV, r=1cm, Rw=3.8cm. V(t) vb

8 Strong final focusing element is utilized to reduce spot size at target.
Utilizing a time-dependent Einzel lens for correcting aberrations in the gap and chromatic effects in focusing system is the best. E.P. Lee, private communication (2008). Placing a strong focusing element is the second best. rsp~ rf 2vb/vb chromatic effects in the final focusing element

9 Methods to neutralize intense ion beam
It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness: It is better to use electrons than fight their presence. (a) emitters, (b) plasma plug, and (c) plasma everywhere (a) emitters Te~1/r2 (b) With plasma Without (c) plasma

10 Plasma plug cannot provide sufficient neutrali-zation compared with plasma filling entire volume.
Beam images at the focal plane non-neutralized (a), neutralized plasma plug (b), and volumetric plasma everywhere (c). P.K. Roy et al, NIMPR. A 544, 225 (2005).

11 To determine degree of neutralization electron fluid and full Maxwell equations are solved numerically and analytically. Solved analytically for a beam pulse with arbitrary value of nb/np, in 2D, using approximations: fluid approach, conservation of generalized vorticity. I. Kaganovich, et al., Phys. Plasmas 8, 4180 (2001); Phys. Plasmas 15, (2008); Nucl. Instr. and Meth. Phys. Res. A 577, 93 (2007).

12 Results of Theory for Self-Electric Field of the Beam Pulse Propagating Through Plasma
Self-electric field is determined by electron inertia ~ electron mass vp b~100V NTX K+ 400keV beam Degree of neutralization Having nb<<np strongly increases the neutralization degree. Fr =e(Er -VbB/c ) Magnetic force dominates the electrical force and it is focusing!

13 Two ways for ion beam pulse to grab electrons to insure full neutralization.
- + Vb Transversely Electron positions in response to ion bunch Longitudinally - + Vb - Note in unneutralized beam pulses, electrons accelerate into the beam attracted by space potential: indicating the inductive field is important even for slow beams!

14 Current Neutralization
#14 Current Neutralization Vb B Ez Vez j Alternating magnetic flux generates inductive electric field, which accelerates electrons along the beam propagation*. For long beams canonical momentum is conserved** * K. Hahn, and E. PJ. Lee, Fusion Engineering and Design 32-33, 417 (1996) ** I. D. Kaganovich, et al, Laser Particle Beams 20, 497 (2002).

15 Influence of magnetic field on beam neutralization by a background plasma
Vb Bsol Vb magnetic field line ion beam pulse magnetic flux surfaces Small radial electron displacement generates fast poloidal rotation according to conservation of azimuthal canonical momentum: The poloidal rotation twists the magnetic field and generates the poloidal magnetic field and large radial electric field. I. Kaganovich, et al, PRL 99, (2007); PoP (2008).

16 Applied magnetic field affects self-electromagnetic fields when ce/pe>Vb/c
Note increase of fields with applied magnetic field Bz0 The self-magnetic field; perturbation in the solenoidal magnetic field; and the radial electric field in a perpendicular slice of the beam pulse. The beam parameters are (a) nb0 = np/2 = 1.2 × 1011cm−3; Vb =0.33c, the beam density profile is gaussian. The values of the applied solenoidal magnetic field, Bz0 are: (b) 300G; and (e) 900G corresponds to cce/Vb pe= (b) 0.57 ; and (e) 1.7.

17 Application of the solenoidal magnetic field allows control of the radial force acting on the beam ions. Fr =e(Er -VbB/c ), Normalized radial force acting on beam ions in plasma for different values of (ce /peb)2. The green line shows a gaussian density profile. rb = 1.5p; p =c/pe. I. Kaganovich, et al, PRL 99, (2007). M. Dorf, et al, PRL 103, (2009).

18 Plasma response to the beam is drastically different depending on ωce/2βbωpe <1 or >1
Ex Ex Gaussian beam: rb=2c/ωpe, lb=5rb, βb =0.33. Brown line indicate the ion beam pulse. ωce/2βbωpe Left: 0.5 Right: 4.5 Electrostatic field is defocusing The response is paramagnetic Electrostatic field is focusing The response is diamagnetic Bz Bz M. Dorf, et al, PRL 103, (2009) , submitted PoP (2009).

19 Excitation of plasma waves by the short rise in the beam head.
normalized electron current jy/(ecnp)

20 Courtesy of J. Pennington and M. Dorf
Beam pulse can excite whistler waves. Gaussian beam with β=0.33, lb=17rb, rb=ωp/c nb=0.05np, ωce/2βb ωpe=1.37 Analytical theory PIC Courtesy of J. Pennington and M. Dorf

21 Quasi - electrostatic wave
Complicated electrodynamics of beam-plasma interaction would make J. Maxwell proud! Artist: E.P. Gilson 2008 B Vb Whistler Quasi - electrostatic wave

22 Movies Courtesy of A. Sefkow

23 Conclusions for simultaneous longitudinal and transverse neutralized compression
Identified limiting factors: errors in the applied velocity tilt compared to the ideal velocity tilt limits the longitudinal compression to times. radial compression is limited by chromatic effects in the focusing system which can be corrected by time-dependent focusing element. the background plasma can provide the necessary neutralization for compression, provided the plasma density exceeds the beam density everywhere along the beam path, i.e., np>nb.

24 Conclusions for neutralization
Developed a nonlinear theory for the quasi-steady-state propagation of an intense ion beam pulse in a background plasma very good charge neutralization: key parameter  p lb/Vb, very good current neutralization: key parameter  prb/c. Application of a solenoidal magnetic field can be used for active control of beam transport through a background plasma. Theory predicts that there is a sizable enhancement of the self-electric and self-magnetic fields where ce~pe. Electromagnetic waves are generated oblique to the direction of the beam propagation where ce>pe..

25 Minimizing the final spot size with respect to L,
Optimization of the final focus system to achieve minimum of the spot size. L The beam spot radius at the target for two solenoids is given by Minimizing the final spot size with respect to L, =1mm

26 Equations for Vector Potential in the Slice Approximation.
The electron return current New term accounting for departure from quasi-neutrality. Magnetic dynamo Electron rotation due to radial displacement I. Kaganovich, et al, PRL 99, (2007).

27 During rapid compression at focal plane the beam can excite lower-hybrid waves if the beam density is less than the plasma density. Courtesy of A. Sefkow


Download ppt "I. D. Kaganovich, R. C. Davidson, M. A. Dorf,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google