1. Wakefields in XFEL undulator intersections Igor Zagorodnov Beam Dynamics Group Meeting 26.02.07

3. Aluminium Elliptical chamber length = 5122 mm

4. Absorber : length 3mm Tapers 2*9.5 mm width 9mm heigh 8mm Copper Absorber length = 22 mm

5. Cavity BPM design, Dirk Lipka elliptical pipe round pipe absorber Round pipe length = 690mm Copper Cavity BPM = 2 Pillbox cavities with gap 10mm and distance 45 mm between them

6. Elements Elliptical chamber = 5122 mm Absorber = 22 mm Round pipe = 690 mm Cavity BPM = 2 Pillbox cavities with gap 10mm and distance 45 mm between them Not considered (see TESLA FEL 2005-10) 216 mm (5000+1100)-5884=266 Pumping slots = 2*25=50 mm Flange gaps? Belows? ??? 5122+22+690+50= =5884 mm

7. Absorber 4 mm 5 mm 4 mm 9.5 mm3 mm 5 mm

8. Absorber. Effect of Tapering 4 mm 5 mm 4 mm 9.5 mm 3 mm 5 mm g = 4 mm 3 mm 4.5 mm 9.5 mm 5 mm 4 mm Loss, V/pC Spread, V/pC step 8935 taper4839 taper +step 5226

9. Absorber. Effect of Tapering 7.5 mm 4.5 mm 9.5 mm3 mm 5 mm 9.5 mm 7.5 mm 4.5 mm This taper has no effect. The taper angle should be about 3 grad.

10. Absorber. Long Elliptical Step Collimator G.Stupakov, K.L.F.Bane, I.Zagorodnov „Optical approximation in the theory of geometric impedance“, in preparation The semi-analytical approach developed in the paper allows to calculate high-frequency impedance of any short transition. Loss=86 V/pC

11. Elliptical 15mm*8.8mm Absorber 9mm*8mm Round R=? Absorber+Round Pipe

12. Loss [V/pC] R [cm] Elliptical 15mm*8.8mm Round R=? Elliptical 15mm*8.8mm ER RE ER RE Total Let us forget about absorber and suggest that we want to have a round pipe. Why do not take a round absorber with R=5mm? Elliptical+Round Pipe

13. Loss [V/pC] R [cm] Elliptical 15mm*8.8mm Round R=? Elliptical 15mm*8.8mm AR RE AR RE Total EA Absorber 9mm*8mm Absorber+Round Pipe+Elliptical Pipe

14. Loss [V/pC] R [cm] Old Type I Geometric Wakes

15. Loss [V/pC] R [cm] Old Type I Type II 40% Geometric Wakes

16. Loss [kV/nC] Spread [kV/nC] R [cm] resistive geom. L=690mm Geometric+Resistive Wakes

17. resistive geom. total R=4.5mm Loss, V/pC Spread, V/pC res.2227 geom.8734 total10955 L=690mm Geometric+Resistive Wakes

18. Aluminium resistivetotal Loss225241 Spread238310 Main Pipe (resistive+oxid layer+roughness) resistive (T.Wohlenberg)

19. only first pillbox total Loss2548 Spread1019 BPM 2*pillbox 4.5 mm 38.58 mm 26.29 mm 45 mm 10 mm BPM

20. Old geometry! Loss9*2=18 Spread4*2=8 Pumping Slots 2 items?

21. Impedance Budget Undulator pipe Pump (2 items) BPM (2 pillboxes) Round pipe in intersection with absorber 15mm* 8.8mm (5122 mm) Old geometry 2*10mmpipe R=4.5 absorber 8mm*9mm (690+22=712mm) pipe R=5mm absorber R=5mm (712mm) Loss, kV/nC241184810974 Spread, kV/nC3108255541 Loss, V/pC Spread, V/pC Total geom. pro section7025 resistive (Al) 6.1m303325 Old budget from TESLA-FEL 2005-10 (elliptical pipe 15*7.6 mm) Energy Spread V/pC

22. Conclusion  In new budget the energy spread is larger by 14 %.  Intersection causes about 25 % of the energy spread.  Round pipe with R=4.5 mm does not increase longitudinal wake.  To suppress the geometric wake the tapers should be less than 3 grad.  Why do not take a round absorber with R=5mm?  A description of 216 mm? (bellows, flange gaps, etc) Energy Spread V/pC