Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byElwin McBride Modified over 9 years ago
1
Andrew Garwood-Gowers (Queensland University of Technology) a.garwood-gowers@qut.edu.au
2
Responsible Protection (RP) represents a more restrictive interpretation of R2P’s pillar III Post-Libya controversy reflects deeper contestation over R2P’s content, scope and implications for international order Global shifts in power point to the emergence of a more diverse, pluralistic international order - RP and Brazil’s RwP initiatives are examples of rising, non-Western powers asserting their own normative preferences on sovereignty, intervention and global governance 2
3
Developed by Dr Ruan Zongze – China Institute of International Studies (CIIS) RP proposes 6 elements which are intended to safeguard against the risk of abuse of pillar III Resurrects decision-making criteria or guidelines from earlier R2P proposals (e.g. ICISS, High Level Panel Report) Shifts the focus away from protection of individuals and back towards the responsibilities of intervening states RP’s significance? - Deeper insights into Beijing’s current position on R2P - How China views itself and its role in the world 3
4
4
5
Principle/ guideline ICISS 2001 R2P ReportBrazil’s RwPChina’s Responsible Protection (RP) 5
6
Draws heavily on Brazil’s RwP, ICISS report But a stricter, narrower conception of pillar III than those earlier initiatives Reflects both principled and pragmatic concerns over R2P e.g. sovereignty, non-interference arguments plus fears about regime change and de-stabilisation China prefers negotiation and dialogue over coercive measures (military and non-military) RP shifts the focus back to a state-centric approach (versus a protection of individuals approach) Consistent with China’s broader vision of global order based on strong, stable states 6
7
RP may point to a general shift towards China adopting a more activist global stance: - “China must have the courage to speak out and contribute its ideas to the world even though it means China will face more difficult and complicated options” China likely to remain sceptical about non- consensual pillar III measures Recent practice points to consensual pillar II measures as the main form of international action 7
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.