1. 1 BENCHMARKING NETWORK DEVICES UNDER ACCLERATED STRESS draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-07.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-meth-04.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-meth-ebgp-00.txt draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-meth-opsec-00.txt Co-authors are Scott Poretsky of Reef Point and Shankar Rao of Qwest 64th IETF Meeting – Vancouver

2. 2 Document Structure Terminology EBGP Peering Methodology … General Methodology Operational Security Methodology –General Methodology has controlled scope –Additional technology specific methodologies can be added

3. 3 Current Status (1 of 2) Terminology –draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-07.txt, Terminology for Accelerated Stress Benchmarking –-07 changes ->  Resolves numerous I-D Nits  Incorporates comment from Jay Karthik for wording of MPLS tunnels General Methodology –draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-meth-04.txt, Methodology Guidelines for Accelerated Stress Benchmarking –-04 changes ->  Resolves numerous I-D Nits

4. 4 Current Status (2 of 2) EBGP Peering Methodology –draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-meth-ebgp-00.txt, Methodology for Benchmarking Accelerated Stress with Operational EBGP Instabilities Operational Security Methodology –draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-meth-opsec-00.txt, Methodology for Benchmarking Accelerated Stress with Operational Security EBGP Peering Stress Test Cases 4.1 Failed Primary EBGP Peer 4.2 Establish New EBGP Peer 4.3 BGP Route Explosion 4.4 BGP Policy Configuration 4.5 Persistent BGP Flapping 4.6 BGP Route Flap Dampening 4.7 Nested Convergence Events Operational Security Stress Test Cases 4.1 Restart Under Load 4.2 Destination Control Processor 4.3 Destination Control Processor with Rate-Limiting 4.4 Destination Interfaces 4.5 DoS Attack

5. 5 Control Plane 30 BGP Peers (2 EBGP, 28 IBGP) 28 OSPF Adjacencies 400K route instances 175K routes in FIB MPLS Disabled Multicast Protocols Disabled 16K IPsec Tunnels 32K IPsec SAs 16K IKE SAs IPsec SA Lifetime = 8 hours IKEv2 SA Lifetime = 8 hours DPD Disabled Example Stress Test – Configuration Set Security Plane 100K Stateful Firewall Sessions 64K Firewall Rules DOS-Protection Enabled Management Plane 20 SSH Sessions 4 RADIUS Servers with round-robin Logging enabled SysLog enabled Statistics enabled Data Plane Interfaces = qty 4 GigE Data Rate = 4 Gbps Packet Size = 1500 bytes QoS Disabled

6. 6 Startup Conditions (as configured on Tester*) BGP and OSPF pre-configured and negotiation starts immediately 50 IPsec Tunnels established per second 1500 Stateful Firewall Sessions established per second Instability Conditions (as configured on Tester*) 1 Interface Shut/No Shut per minute 1 OSPF Interface Cost Change per hour 100 IPsec Tunnels flapped (setup/teardown) per second 20 IKEv2/IPsec Rekeys per second RADIUS Server lost every 30 minutes Continuous DOS Attacks (using Nessus) Close/Open 1 SSH session per minute Enter SHOW, Config, and Errored commands for every open session 1 SNMP GET per second 1 FTP File Transer of 100Mb every second * Tester is Test Device or System of Test Devices Example Stress Test – Test Conditions

7. 7 DEVICE #1 1. Configuration Sets achieved 2. Startup Phase Benchmarks Stable Aggregate forwarding Rate = 4Gbps Stable Latency = 110 usec Stable Session Count = 30 BGP Peers 28 OSPF Adjacencies 16K IPsec Tunnels 3. Apply Instability Conditions 4. Instability Phase Benchmarks* Unstable Aggregate Forwarding Rate = 3.5Gbps Degraded Aggregate Forwarding Rate = 0.5Gbps Unstable Latency = 110usec Unstable Uncontrolled Sessions Lost = 126 *These are averages. It is recommended to record these values at 1 second interval 5. Stop applying Instability Conditions after X hours (24 for this test) 6. Recover Phase Benchmarks Recovery Time = 22 seconds Recovered Aggregate Forwarding Rate = 4Gbps Recovered Latency = 110usec Recovered Uncontrolled Sessions Lost = 0 Example Stress Test – Benchmarks DEVICE #2 1. Configuration Sets achieved 2. Startup Phase Benchmarks Stable Aggregate forwarding Rate = 4Gbps Stable Latency = 150 usec Stable Session Count = 30 BGP Peers 28 OSPF Adjacencies 16K IPsec Tunnels 3. Apply Instability Conditions 4. Instability Phase Benchmarks* Unstable Aggregate Forwarding Rate=3.3Gbps Degraded Aggregate Forwarding Rate= 0.7Gbps Unstable Latency = 170usec Unstable Uncontrolled Sessions Lost = 4000 *These are averages. It is recommended to record these values at 1 second interval 5. Stop applying Instability Conditions after X hours (24 for this test) 6. Recover Phase Benchmarks Recovery Time= Infinite Recovered Aggregate Forwarding Rate = 3.9Gbps Recovered Latency = 150usec Recovered Uncontrolled Sessions Lost = 97 Configuration Set in this test was reduced from a previous test because Device #2 crashed at 20 hours Test was repeated with 3 rd Configuration Set to obtain a Recovery Time for Device #2

8. 8 Next Steps Is Terminology and Methodology ready for WGLC? Incorporate mailing list comments from BMWG and OpSec Identify and Add more test cases to EBGP Peering and Operational Security Methodologies Suggestions posted on Mailing List for new Methodologies: MPLS-TE network specific test cases LDP over RSVP-TE specific test cases