1. Setting the Context: impacts of migration between 2001-11 Antoine Paccoud LSE Geography 24-03-2014 What we have learned from the last decade

2. OUTLINE Limitations The situation in 2011 Identifying trends: 2001 - 2011 Zooming in: South London Causes/implications

3. LIMITATIONS Focus on Country of Birth Data for 2001 and 2011 Not on date of arrival Not on ethnicity/nationality Focus on Greater London Not on extended London region Focus on spatial patterns Not on socio-economic characteristics

4. London’s super-diversity in the UK context The UK-born in the wider London region The settlement patterns of different migrant groups THE SITUATION IN 2011

6. London’s super-diversity in the UK context The UK-born in the wider London region The settlement patterns of different migrant groups THE SITUATION IN 2011

9. London’s super-diversity in the UK context The UK-born in the wider London region The settlement patterns of different migrant groups THE SITUATION IN 2011

11. Differentiating between ‘diversities’ A return to the centre of the UK born? Summarising changes IDENTIFYING TRENDS: 2001-2011

12. 1. USA, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Australia, China, HK 3.6% in 2001; 5.5% in 2011 2. India, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Romania 5% in 2001; 7.9% in 2011 3. Jamaica, Nigeria, Portugal, Turkey, Somalia 3.3% in 2001; 5% in 2011 UK: 73.1% in 2001; 71.7% in 2011 Poland: 0.3% in 2001; 2.2% in 2011 DIFFERENT DIVERSITIES 2001: 85.4% 2011: 92.3%

13. Type 1 2001

14. Type 1 2011

15. Type 2 2001

16. Type 2 2011

17. Type 3 2001

18. Type 3 2011

19. Differentiating between ‘diversities’ A return to the centre of the UK born? Summarising changes IDENTIFYING TRENDS: 2001-2011

20. Location Quotient 2001 – United Kingdom UK 2001

21. Location Quotient 2011 – United Kingdom UK 2011

22. Differentiating between ‘diversities’ A return to the centre of the UK born? Summarising changes IDENTIFYING TRENDS: 2001-2011

25. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

28. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

29. All Residents 2001

30. All Residents 2011

31. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

32. UK 2001

33. UK 2011

34. UK 2001-2011

35. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

36. Germany 2001

37. Germany 2011

38. Germany 2001-2011

39. USA 2001

40. USA 2011

41. USA 2001-2011

42. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

43. India 2001

44. India 2011

45. India 2001-2011

46. Pakistan 2001

47. Pakistan 2011

48. Pakistan 2001-2011

49. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

50. Jamaica 2001

51. Jamaica 2011

52. Jamaica 2001-2011

53. Nigeria 2001

54. Nigeria 2011

55. Nigeria 2001-2011

56. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

57. Poland 2001

58. Poland 2011

59. Poland 2001-2011

60. SOUTHWARK, LAMBETH, LEWISHAM Summary All residents UK Group 1: Germany, USA Group 2: India, Pakistan Group 3: Jamaica, Nigeria Poland ZOOMING IN

62. Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants Change in the spatial distribution of social renting households Current threats to London’s diversity CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS

63. Benefits 2001

64. Benefits 2010

65. Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants Change in the spatial distribution of social renting households Current threats to London’s diversity CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS

66. Social Rented 2001

67. Social Rented 2011

68. Change in the spatial distribution of benefit claimants Change in the spatial distribution of socially rented housing Current threats to London’s diversity CAUSES/IMPLICATIONS

69. Re-commodification of labour Local Government cuts (social housing) Welfare Reforms (‘Bedroom Tax’, housing benefits, benefit cap, etc.) Housing market Increasing house prices (Help to Buy) Proposed immigration checks (racial profiling) CURRENT THREATS