1. Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013

2. State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API)

3. State Accountability - API API continues to be an important part of public school accountability in California. 1 For 2013, schools must reach an API of 770 or grow at least 5 % of the difference between their Base API and 8 00 each year until they reach an API of 800. 2 Districts must also meet the yearly API target and reach 800 by the 2013-14 school year. 3 English-Language Arts, Mathematics, History-Social Science, and Science test results are included in the API calculation. 4 Graduation rates are also included in the high school API calculations. 5

4. School API 10-Year Growth Trend

5. 3-Year API Growth Analysis – 20 Mile March Name of School Base 2010 Growth 2011 Diff. 2010-11 Base 2011 Growth 2012 Diff. 2011-12 Base 2012 Growth 2013 Diff. 2012-13 Average Growth Per Year 2010-2013 SCHOOLWIDE 644659156836907 7091913.7 Asian 79079998118187 83618 11.3 Hispanic or Latino 59161019642635-7666642-24 -4.0 White 712682-307067159N/A SES Disadvantaged 632649176736741 70127 15.0 English Learners 623621-264466622666657-9 3.7 Students with Disabilities 36136213744224843145524 24.3

6. Summarizing Test Results CST

7. CSTs by Grade Level

8. CST– English/Language Arts Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

9. CST/CMA ELA – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in ELA -3-20+1+2+3 Grade 9101342300 Grade 10031144210 Grade 11101342300 Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?

10. CST– Algebra 1 Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

11. CST– Geometry Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

12. CST– Algebra 2 Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

13. CST– High School Summative Math Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

14. CST/CMA Algebra 1 – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math -3-20+1+2+3 Grade 9101342300 Grade 10031144210 Grade 110226230157191 Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?

15. CST/CMA Geometry – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math -3-20+1+2+3 Grade 9101342300 Grade 10031144210 Grade 110226230157191 Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?

16. CST/CMA Algebra 2 – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math -3-20+1+2+3 Grade 9101342300 Grade 10031144210 Grade 110226230157191 Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?

17. CST/CMA HS Summative Math – Sliders, Stickers, and Jumpers Number of Students Making Proficiency Band Growth in Math -3-20+1+2+3 Grade 9101342300 Grade 10031144210 Grade 110226230157191 Who are your students who have/have not made proficiency band growth? What are your plans for students who have dropped one or more levels?

18. CST– Life Science (Grade 10) Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

19. CST– Biology Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

20. CST– Chemistry Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

21. CST– Earth Science Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

22. CST– Physics Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

23. CST– World History (Grade 10) Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

24. CST– US History (Grade 11) Percent of Students Scoring Proficient or Advanced

25. CST Cluster Scores

26. CST Cluster Scores for English/Language Arts By Grade Level

27. CST Cluster Scores for Algebra 1

28. CST Cluster Scores for Geometry

29. CST Cluster Scores for Algebra 2

30. CST Cluster Scores for Summative HS Math

31. AYP Growth

32. Significant Subgroup Data – 2013 AYP Comparison of Percent Proficient or Above – English/Language Arts All Students African American Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities All Students African American Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities 73.3% 64.1% 93.9% 85.6% 57.3% 81.9% 83.3% 56.4% 57.3% 49.0% 73.3% 64.1% 93.9% 85.6% 57.3% 81.9% 83.3% 56.4% 57.3% 49.0% 2013 70.7% 51.2% 93.4% 84.0% 53.8% 82.3% 86.1% 52.3% 53.7% 49.8% 70.7% 51.2% 93.4% 84.0% 53.8% 82.3% 86.1% 52.3% 53.7% 49.8% 69.3% 54.7% 92.6% 82.8% 50.0% 82.6% 82.3% 48.5% 49.6% 48.2% 69.3% 54.7% 92.6% 82.8% 50.0% 82.6% 82.3% 48.5% 49.6% 48.2% 2011 2012 Subgroup 3-Year Growth +4 +9.4 +1.3 +2.8 +7.3 -.5 +1.0 +7.9 +7.7 +.8

33. Significant Subgroup Data – 2013 AYP Comparison of Percent Proficient or Above – Mathematics All Students African American Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities All Students African American Asian Filipino Hispanic or Latino White Two or More Races Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners Students with Disabilities 73.3% 64.1% 93.9% 85.6% 57.3% 84.8% 83.3% 56.4% 57.3% 49.0% 73.3% 64.1% 93.9% 85.6% 57.3% 84.8% 83.3% 56.4% 57.3% 49.0% 2013 70.7% 51.2% 93.4% 84.0% 53.8% 82.3% 86.1% 52.3% 53.7% 49.8% 70.7% 51.2% 93.4% 84.0% 53.8% 82.3% 86.1% 52.3% 53.7% 49.8% 69.3% 54.7% 92.6% 82.8% 50.0% 82.6% 82.3% 48.5% 49.6% 48.2% 69.3% 54.7% 92.6% 82.8% 50.0% 82.6% 82.3% 48.5% 49.6% 48.2% 2011 2012 Subgroup 3-Year Growth +4 +9.4 +1.3 +2.8 +7.3 +2.2 +1.0 +7.9 +7.7 +.8

34. English Language Development

35. 3-Year CELDT Analysis

36. Percent of Students Redesignated English Proficient (2012-13)

37. Long Term English Learners How are EL students performing on the CELDT based on the length of time they have been in U.S. schools? Length of Time in U.S. Schools Number Percent Early Advanced or Advanced; English Proficient Early Advanced or Advanced; Not English Proficient IntermediateEarly Intermediate BeginningTotal (by Time) 6 or more yearsN14355858219 %65%2%26%2%4%90% 5 yearsN711009 %78%11% 0% 4% 4 yearsN500106 %83%0% 17%0%2% 3 years or lessN211048 %25%13% 0%50%3% Total (by level) N157760612242 %65%3%25%2%5%100%

38. Intermediate Level English Learners CST English-Language Arts How are EL students at the Intermediate level on CELDT performing on the CST E/LA by grade level? ELA CST Performance Number Percent Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Total (by CST) Far Below BasicN01012 %0%17%0%33%7% Below BasicN22015 %18%33%0%33%19% BasicN42118 %36%33%0%33%30% ProficientN31307 %27%17%43%0%26% AdvancedN20305 %18%0%43%0%19% Total by GradeN1167327 %41%22%26%11%100% Who are your Intermediate EL students who are scoring Basic and Below on the CST E/LA? What are your plans for these students?

39. Intermediate Level English Learners Mathematics How are EL students at the Intermediate level on CELDT performing on the CST Mathematics by grade level? ELA CST Performance Number Percent Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5Total (by CST) Far Below BasicN01012 %0%17%0%33%7% Below BasicN22015 %18%33%0%33%19% BasicN42118 %36%33%0%33%30% ProficientN31307 %27%17%43%0%26% AdvancedN20305 %18%0%43%0%19% Total by GradeN1167327 %41%22%26%11%100% Who are your Intermediate EL students who are scoring Basic and below on the CST ELA? What are your plans for these students?

40. CAHSEE – Grade 10

41. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Gender – ELA

42. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Ethnicity - ELA

43. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Language Proficiency - ELA

44. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by SES Status - ELA

45. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates for Special Education Students - ELA

46. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Gender – Mathematics

47. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Ethnicity - Mathematics

48. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by Language Proficiency - Mathematics

49. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates by SES Status - Mathematics

50. CAHSEE Proficiency Rates for Special Education Students - Mathematics

51. AP Equity Access

52. Access to AP Exams (Equity) AP Data20092010201120122013 # of Test Takers # of Tests Taken # of Tests Scored 3 or Above Grade 11 and 12 Enrollment Passing Rate % of AP Students w/ Scores of 3 or Above *Qualifying Rate * Qualifying Rate = # Passed Tests/Grade 11 & 12 Enrollment

53. Other Indicators (Discipline, Attendance, SAT, ACT, Benchmarks, etc.)

54. How our School is Responding to the Data Signature Practice: – Next steps

55. Transition to Common Core Steps we are taking in 2013-14