Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy"— Presentation transcript:

1 Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy

2 1. Select Test Areas Selecte test areas in an image to evaluate the accuracy of a classification Test areas should be representative categorically and geographically Sampling methods: uniform wall-to-wall, random, stratified random sampling         Sample size: pixels each category

3

4

5 2. Error Assessment A classification is not complete until its accuracy is assessed Error matrix KHAT statistics

6 Error Matrix Also called confusion matrix and contingency table
Compares the ground truth and the results of the classification for the test areas Can be used to evaluate the result of classifying the training set pixels and the results of classifying the actual full-scene

7 Error Matrix Diagonal cells are correctly classified pixels
                 Classified                       Reference Data Data     Water  Sand  Forest   Urban    Corn Hay Row Total Water         Sand Forest              Urban Corn Hay Col Total        68     Diagonal cells are correctly classified pixels                             correctly classified pixels Overall accuracy =  = = 84%                                total pixels evaluated

8 Error Matrix                  Classified                       Reference Data Data     Water  Sand  Forest   Urban    Corn Hay Row Total Water         Sand Forest              Urban Corn Hay Col Total        68     In this case, the non-diagonal column cells are omission errors e.g. omission error for forest = 43/356 = 12% The non-diagonal row cells are commission errors e.g. commission error for corn 117/459 = 25%

9 Error Matrix Omission error = 1 (100%) - producer's accuracy
                 Classified                       Reference Data Data     Water  Sand  Forest   Urban    Corn Hay Row Total Water         Sand Forest              Urban Corn Hay Col Total        68                                       correctly classified in each category producer's accuracy =                             the total pixels used in the category (col total) Omission error = 1 (100%) - producer's accuracy

10 Error Matrix Commission error = 1 (100%) - user's accuracy
                 Classified                       Reference Data Data     Water  Sand  Forest   Urban    Corn Hay Row Total Water         Sand Forest              Urban Corn Hay Col Total        68                                       correctly classified in each category user's accuracy =                           the total pixels used in the category (row total) Commission error = 1 (100%) - user's accuracy

11

12

13 KHAT Statistics A measure of the difference between the actual agreement between reference data and the results of classification, and the chance agreement between the reference data and a random classifier

14 KHAT Statistics ^      observed accuracy - chance agreement k  =              chance agreement The KHAT value usually ranges from 0 to 1 0 indicates the classification is not any better than a random assignment of pixels 1 indicates that the classification is 100% improvement from random assignment

15 KHAT Statistics             r          r        N × S xii -  S (xi+  ×  x+i) ^         i=1       i=1 k =                     r            N2  -  S (xi+  ×  x+i)                   i=1 r - number of rows in the error matrix xii - number of obs in row i and column i (the diagonal cells) xi+ - total obs of row i x+i - total obs of column i N - total of obs in the matrix

16 KHAT

17 KHAT Statistics KHAT considers both omission and commission errors

18

19 Readings Chapter 7


Download ppt "Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google