Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySabina Murphy Modified over 9 years ago
1
Task Force On The Future of the Global Positioning System (extract) DSB Task Force on the Future of the Global Positioning System
2
National PNT Objectives* Provide uninterrupted availability of positioning, navigation, and timing services Meet growing national, homeland, economic security, and civil requirements, and scientific and commercial demands Remain the pre-eminent military space-based positioning, navigation, and timing service Continue to provide civil services that exceed or are competitive with foreign civil space-based positioning, navigation, and timing services and augmentation systems Remain essential components of internationally accepted positioning, navigation, and timing services Promote U.S. technological leadership in applications involving space- based positioning, navigation, and timing services * Source: U.S. Space-based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Policy, NSPD Signed by President Bush, 15 December 2004 DSB Task Force on the Future of the Global Positioning System
3
Salient Points from Task Force The service provided to users is crucial—not sub-optimizing the satellite component GPS is a system-of-systems. Satellites, operational control segment & receivers must be effectively integrated Minimum constellation size should be 30 satellites—to better support ground forces in varied terrain Ambitious requirements are driving the cost of GPS III –Cost & weight must be controlled –Dual launch essential Relax emphasis on anti-spoof. Increase attention to anti-jam Time & attention must be given to maintain GPS as world’s premier satellite navigation. Governance needs adjustment & improvement—open-minded approach is necessary in considering options DSB Task Force on the Future of the Global Positioning System
4
Mask Angle Effects DSB Task Force on the Future of the Global Positioning System 5o5o 15 o X X 5o5o (30-1) (24-1) (24-2) (24-3) (24-5) (24-4) (24-6) Assumes 1 m User Range Error Differences caused by Geometric Dilution of Precision effects (DOP x URE = Accuracy)
5
GPS III Launch Costs EELV Costs: EELV-L=$75M; EELV-M=$90M; EELV-H=$150M (Buy #1) EELV-L=$150M; EELV-M=$180M; EELV-H=$300M (Buy #3 – in Source Selection) Failure Rates: 4% Single; 5% Dual (Source: GPS JPO Study, 20 Jul 05) DSB Task Force on the Future of the Global Positioning System
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.