1. How to use DNS during the evolution of ICN? Zhiwei Yan

2. 2 1 Background 2 Content Naming 3 Content Management 4 Content Addressing 5 Analysis & Conclusions Outline

3. 3 1 Background 2 Content Naming 3 Content Management 4 Content Addressing 5 Analysis & Conclusions Outline

4. DNS: Domain Name System 4 DNS is used to locate the resource in the Internet.

5. DNS: Resource Record 5 30 years development, >5 million DNS servers, >100 RFCs, >30 available RRs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNS_record_types http://www.webhosting.info/domains

6. DNS: DNSSEC 1 6 master Caching forwarder resolver Zone administrator Zone file Dynamic updates 12 slaves 345 Registry/Registrar Provisioning DNS data flow

7. DNS: DNSSEC 2 7 DNS Vulnerabilities master Caching forwarder resolver Zone administrator Zone file Dynamic updates 12 slaves 345 Corrupting data Impersonating master Unauthorized updates Cache impersonation Cache pollution by Data spoofing Altered zone data Registry/Registrar Provisioning

8. DNS: DNSSEC 3 8 DNSSEC Provides Data Security master Caching forwarder resolver Zone administrator Zone file Dynamic updates slaves Registry/Registrar Provisioning example.com A 10.8.0.1 Among the 316 TLDs in the root zone, 110 TLDs have been signed and many other are planning to do so. http://stats.research.icann.org/dns/tld_report/

9. DNS: DANE 9 Authentication of DNS names for TLS (Transport-Layer Security) endpoints is a core security challenge in many Internet protocols, most famously HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol). The DANE (DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities) working group in IETF is developing protocols that allow certificates to be bound to DNS names using DNSSEC. RR is TLSA Currently, there are many open source implementations of the DANE protocol and Google has implemented the DANE client in its Chrome browser.

10. 10 1 Background 2 Content Naming 3 Content Management 4 Content Addressing 5 Analysis & Conclusions Outline

11. Two Schemes: 1)Flat : security 2)Hierarchical : scalability 11 Naming Scalable Secure Readable Content naming: Hierarchical path: public key Example: cn/sina/nba/11-20/match.avi:ALG|0xf01212099abcab678ac345

12. 12 1 Background 2 Content Naming 3 Content Management 4 Content Addressing 5 Analysis & Conclusions Outline

13. 13 Management In each domain, CMA (Content Management Anchor) is deployed. 1) The binding between CMA and the related prefix is stored in DNS as: Content-Prefix—A/AAAA—TTL—IP-of-CMA 2) The binding between the resource and its location is stored in CMA.

14. 14 1 Background 2 Content Naming 3 Content Management 4 Content Addressing 5 Analysis & Conclusions Outline

15. 15 Addressing : CCN (Interest) A parameter like TTL (Hop limit) in Interest is used. At each hop: Hop limit= Hop limit-1 If the Hop limit=0 DNS resolution else, Flooding

16. 16 Addressing : CCN (Data) Match the name with TLSA Verify the content with L A trade-off issue here is: If the check is done by the router DoS attack If the check is done by the client Client load

17. 17 1 Background 2 Content Naming 3 Content Management 4 Content Addressing 5 Analysis & Conclusions Outline

18. Analysis - Security Security dependency cn/sina/nba/11-20/match.avi:ALG|0xf01212099abcab678ac345 DANE: TLSA Match? Content is signed by the Private key DNSSEC Content source Match?

19. Analysis – Scalability 1 Analyzing model To simplify the analysis, we have made the following assumptions: 1. Nodes are distributed uniformly across the network. 2. The zone-radius of every node in the network is same. 3. The overhead induced by state maintenance is not considered. The number of nodes in the i-hop range is The average hit probability during every hop is * R is used to estimate the area of the network, N is the total number of nodes in the network.

20. Analysis – Scalability 2 1. When the Interest can be met within H hop range, the cost of the proposed scheme is * ɑ i s the signaling message cost per node per Interest message 2. When the Interest cannot be met in the H-hop range, the DNS resolution will be triggered after the Hth hop flooding, and then the cost is * C DNS denotes the DNS resolution cost

21. Analysis – Stability In order to reduce the querying latency, the source in the current CCN may need to flood the information to the network. When the source node moves, this will cause high failure probability because the recorded FIB information is invalid. However, our scheme can reduce the flooding range for the mobile source and support its mobility with the help of DNS dynamic update. For fairness, we assume that the Interest message has to be met before the (H+1)-hop flooding. For the current CCN scheme, the prefix information has to be broadcasted to the (R-H)-hop range, however, our scheme only needs the DNS update. Then their stability ratio is

22. Analysis – Security In our scheme, the key is an essential part of the name and the name is no longer a pure human-readable string but includes a cryptographic part. 1. That the public key is directly contained in the name, which poses a challenge to usability, since humans cannot understand or remember them. 2. Any move of the content may require the reworking of the name. 3. Cryptographic algorithm upgrades will result in name changes, and careful engineering is required to manage their usability implications.

23. Conclusions Security Stability Shortcoming Scalability Establishes the complete security chain for the content addressing. Supports the mobility of content source Poses a challenge to usability due to the public key Limits the signaling cost during the content addressing DNS based ICN

24. ご清聴ありがとうございまし た。