Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byErik Gardner Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rehabilitation of Finger Extension in Chronic Hemiplegia
Derek Kamper1,2 Tiffany Kline4 Xun Luo3 Robert Kenyon1,3 Heidi Waldinger1 Erik Cruz1 William Z. Rymer1,2 1Sensory Motor Performance Program 2Northwestern University 3University of Illinois at Chicago 4Marquette University
2
Background Friedland, F., “Physical Therapy,” in Stroke and its Rehabilitation Limited finger extension is the most common chronic motor impairment following stroke (Trombly, 1989).
3
Background Preferential extensor weakness
24 stroke subjects, 6 control subjects
4
Background Flexor hypertonicity
Attempted voluntary isometric extension Attempted voluntary isometric flexion
5
Rationale Evidence that sustained voluntary contractions can increase excitability of involved corticospinal pathways (Sacco et al., 1997) Repetitive practice seems to lead to improvement, as shown with constraint-induced therapy (Page et al., 2004) However, CTI may not be viable for subjects with severe impairment (Bonifer and Anderson, 2003)
6
Aim: Develop device to assist finger extension for rehabilitation therapy
Criteria Assist extension only Externally actuated Lightweight Safe Provide feedback of assistance
7
Current technologies Hand Master, Rutgers University
Functional Tone Management System Hand Mentor, Kinetic Muscles, Inc.
8
Development activities
Body-powered orthosis (HandAid) Cable-driven Biscapular abduction/ shoulder flexion produce finger extension Figure 8 harness Force transducer measures assistance
9
Development activities
10
Development activities
Pneumatically-powered hand (PneuHand)
11
Control Create desired trajectory from object size
Servo about desired trajectory Electro-pneumatic valve Provide assistance only when extensor EMG above threshold value
12
Subject population Chronic hemiplegia following stroke (> 9 months)
Stage 2 or 3 for hand on Chedoke-McMaster scale (< 50% full finger extension) Absence of visuoperceptual disturbance Absence of fixed contracture Capacity to provide informed consent
13
Training paradigm 3 groups
HandAid, PneuHand, No assistance Attempt to grasp virtual targets (30 min) and actual objects (30 min) 24 training sessions 3 sessions/week 8 weeks total Tests pre- and post-training Kinetics (servomotor) Kinematics (CyberGlove) Function (Wolf Motor Function Test)
14
Augmented reality Training Glasstron head-mounted display
CAVElibrary Menu-driven object selection Object moves and rotates with hand once acquired Flock of birds sensors on head and hand
15
Augmented reality environment
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.