1. Cooperative Agricultural Monitoring on California’s Central Coast: An Integrated, Innovative Approach Karen Worcester, Staff Environmental Scientist Alison Jones, Environmental Scientist Dave Paradies, Software Designer Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board

2. Central Coast Region

3. Agricultural areas of the Central Coast

4. In the Central Coast we have: 450,000 acres of irrigated agriculture A $3 billion industry 2500 growers Many operations under 50 acres 2 staff positions to run our “Ag Waiver” program

5. Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) 1999 - State law amended Existing waivers expired January 1, 2003 New waivers may not exceed five years Conditions must be enforced Waivers must include monitoring What are “Ag Waivers”?

6. Monitoring Implementation of Management Practices Education Both owner and operator must comply with the conditions of the waiver All growers enroll individually

7. Education Requirements 15 hours most easily met through UCCE Farm Water Quality Short Course Over 2000 growers have attended 51 Short Courses held; 13 more planned over next 8 months Course product is Farm Plan

8. With 1600 enrollees, we needed to leverage staffing with technology!

9. Enrollment Database Notice of Intent includes: Ranch Info Crop type Irrigation type Discharge type Management Practices Hard copy maps and education certificates www.ccamp.org

10. Management practices, crop types, irrigation practices are mapped by Township-Section-Range

11. Monitoring

12. Elevated nitrate problems in intensively irrigated agricultural areas Toxicity associated with organophosphates and pyrethroid pesticides in intensively irrigated agricultural areas Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program and SWAMP partners had shown:

13. Mean Surface Water Nitrate Concentrations (mg/L)

14. Nitrate exceedances in DHS Wells

15. Nitrate in Department of Health Services Well Data, 1980 - 2001

16. Waiver allows for Cooperative Monitoring Program Nonprofit formed (Central Coast Water Quality Preservation, Inc.) Cost allocation subcommittee Monitoring subcommittee Most funding for first three years Phase 1 monitoring complete (25 sites); Phase 2 is underway (50 sites)

17. Monitoring Program Elements 50 sites in waterbodies with: Ag related TMDLs Elevated groundwater nitrate levels Follow-up in problem areas (@ 25% of monitoring budget) Electronic reporting

18. Monitoring Components (compatible with CCAMP design) Monthly conventional monitoring and flow 3-species water toxicity testing Twice during high flow Twice during low flow Sediment toxicity testing Benthic invertebrate assessment

19. Integration with other monitoring programs With CCAMP With City of Salinas stormwater permit With SWAMP

20. Phase 1 (yellow) and Phase 2 (red) Monitoring Sites Monterey Bay Pt. Conception

21. Follow-up to detect source areas; solve problems Long term site Basic Monitoring Concept Concept

22. Followup May take a problem-specific rather than site-specific approach Includes evaluation: Existing research Pesticide Applications evaluation Crop patterns Other land uses Appropriate management practices Includes outreach

23. Electronic Reporting Web-based data checker Format will port into SWAMP Format will port into CCAMP web site generator www.ccamp.org

24. Initial Cooperative Monitoring Program Findings

25. Nitrate (mg/L as N) Mean and range by waterbody

26. Average Nitrate Concentrations at Ag Sites Nitrate as N (mg/L) 0 – 1.5 1.5 – 5.0 5.0 – 10 10 – 25 25 - 100

27. Mean Nitrate (mg/L) at Ag and CCAMP Sites Nitrate as N (mg/L) 0 – 1.5 1.5 – 5.0 5.0 – 10 10 – 25 25 - 100

28. Ceriodaphnia Survival (relative percent difference from control)

29. Ceriodaphnia Mortality (%) 0 – 20 20 - 40 40 – 60 60 - 80 80 - 100 Ceriodaphnia Mortality (%)

30. Hyalella Mortality (%) 0 – 20 20 - 40 40 – 60 60 - 80 80 - 100 Hyalella Mortality (%)

31. Fathead Minnow Mortality Pimephales Mortality (%) 0 – 20 20 - 40 40 – 60 60 - 80 80 - 100

32. Selenastrum Growth (relative percent difference from control)

33. What’s next? Linking land activities with monitoring sites Water quality trends Practice implementation Pesticide use data Ranch mailings Long term site

34. What’s next, cont. Follow-up projects Ceriodaphnia toxicity Hyalella toxicity Assessment of first year’s data Ag program web site development Locating non-filers

35. For more information contact: Amanda Bern at abern@waterboards.ca.gov or Karen at kworcester@waterboards.ca.gov abern@waterboards.ca.govkworcester@waterboards.ca.govabern@waterboards.ca.govkworcester@waterboards.ca.gov