1. STAGE 0 PROJECT: ACCESSIBILITY FOR AUDIO, VIDEO AND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT Presentation: IEC TC100 Advisory Group on Strategy (AGS), Tel Aviv 100/Paccessibility and usability (001) 015 Jean Baronas and Kate Grant October 18, 2009

2. Stage 0 Project Team Update  The Project Team held 3 teleconferences since the Sao Paulo meetings:  10 February 2009  1 April 2009  31 August 2009  The ballot on the draft Technical Report closed October 10, 2009  Comment resolution October 19, 2009 in Tel Aviv  Great Project Team spirit throughout the year

3. Proposed checklist (extracted)  4.a. Has the intent and meaning of terminology been considered?  4.b. Has interchangeable terminology and the use of graphics, drawings, and / or images been considered?  5.a. Has the extent to which the equipment and services will be used been considered?  5.b. Has the scope of disability been defined?

4. Proposed checklist  5.c. Has Universal Design been considered?  5.d. Has “good usability” been considered?  7.a. Have the completed standards and ongoing projects been considered?  8.a. Has the perception of visual information been considered?  8.b. Has the perception of auditory information been considered?

5. Proposed cheklist  8.c. Has the perception of the existence and location of actionable components been considered?  8.d. Has the perception of the status of controls and indicators been considered?

6. Proposed checklist  8.e. Has the perception of feedback from an operation been considered?  8.f. Has the ability to invoke and carry out all actions including maintenance and setup been considered?  8.g. Has the ability to complete actions and tasks within the time allowed been considered?

7. Proposed checklist  8.h. Has the concept of protection from accidental activation been considered?  8.i. Has the ability to recover from errors been considered?  8.j. Have security and privacy based on listening and automatic protection of information been considered?  8.k. Has the protection from personal risk been considered?

8. Proposed checklist  8.l. Has the efficient operation of a product been considered?  8.m. Has the product use been considered?  8.n. Has the output / displayed material been considered?  8.o. Has the ability to use assistive technology been considered?

9. Proposed checklist  8.p. Consideration of cross cutting issues?  new accessible technologies  adjustments for built-in accessibility features  access to customer service and training  ways to provide feedback about improvements to accessibility  accessibility functions available at all times, without disruption

10. Summary  Project Team (PT) teleconferences yielded results  Still can benefit from increased Technical Area Manager (TAM) participation for “top down” standards analysis  Still can benefit from liaisons  Good sponsor for the teleconference logistics is important  Thank you to our sponsor!  On-line collaboration tools help: www.iec.ch  Timeline / goals met