Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Supported by NSTX Team Meeting March 23, 2005 Columbia U Comp-X GA INEL JHU LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Supported by NSTX Team Meeting March 23, 2005 Columbia U Comp-X GA INEL JHU LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine."— Presentation transcript:

1 Supported by NSTX Team Meeting March 23, 2005 Columbia U Comp-X GA INEL JHU LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA UCSD U Maryland U New Mexico U Wash U Wisc UKAEA Fusion Hiroshima U HIST Kyushu Tokai U Niigata U Tsukuba U U Tokyo Ioffe Inst TRINITI KBSI KAIST ENEA Frascati

2 Time: 1: 30 ~ 3:00, Place LSB-318, March 23, 2005 General Items: 1:30 - 1: 45 FY 07 Budget Planning Meeting: 1:45 - 2:00 Preparation toward FY 05 Run: 2:00 - 3:00 - Engineering Activities - A. VonHalle - Research Operations - M. Bell - Run Coordination - J. Menard NSTX Team Meeting Agenda

3 Safely, Safely, Safely To all, I have just been informed that the Laboratory has earned the following safety awards from the State of New Jersey for performance in 2004: 1. PPPL : Recognition Award for having a low rate of away-from-work lost time injury/illness cases. 2. Maintenance & Operations Division: Citation of Merit Award for having no away-from-work lost time injury/illness cases. 3. NSTX Project - Commissioner of Labor and Workforce Development Continued Excellence Award for having gone 4 consecutive years without an away from work lost time injury/illness case. These awards will be presented at an upcoming Governor’s Occupational Safety and Health Awards Program Area dinner. Congratulations! (Jerry Levine)

4 Tuesday, March 15 8:30 a.m.Opening CommentsAnne Davies 8:45 a.m.Status of ITER NegotiationsMichael Roberts 9:00 a.m.Overview of ITER ProjectActivities in the U.S.Ned Sauthoff 9:30 a.m.ITER Institutional IssuesNed Sauthoff 9:45 a.m.C-Mod Research Plans and Budget Earl Marmar 10:15 a.m.MIT Institutional IssuesMiklos Porkolab 10:50 a.m.DIII-D: IntroductionRon Stambaugh 11:00 a.m.DIII-D Research PlansMickey Wade 11:30 a.m.University Research and DIII-DJerry Navratil 11:45 a.m. DIII-D Program Budget and Schedules Ron Stambaugh 1:15 p.m.NSTX Research PlansMartin Peng 1:30 p.m. Facility and Budget PlansMasa Ono 1:55 p.m.PPPL Institutional IssuesRich Hawryluk

5 2:15 p.m. Plasma ScienceDOE Laboratory GeneralMike Crisp Plasma Science Competition NSF/DOE Partnership Competition 2:45 p.m. ICC Issues/ChallengesG. Wurden/B. Hooper 3:15 p.m.MST Plans/Institutional IssuesStewart Prager 4:10 p.m.National Compact Stellarator Program Jim Lyon 4:35 p.m NCSX StatusHutch Neilson 5:05 p.m.International Collaboration 5:15 p.m.Speakers: International Activities UpdateDale Meade Wednesday, March 16 8:30 a.m.TheoryProgram OverviewCurt Bolton 8:45 a.m. Theory Issues/Plans Waelbroeck 9:55 a.m.Enabling R&D:Issues/Challenges/PlansStan Milora 11:05 a.m.HEDPIssues/Challenges/PlansGrant Logan 11:35 a.m.IFE Issues/Challenges/PlansMike Campbell 1:15 p.m.ITER ParticipationMichael Roberts Community Participation in the ITER Project Ned Sauthoff 3:15 p.m.ITER Physics and Burning Plasma Program Panel Discussion: Members – Stewart Prager (moderator), Steve Allen, Earl Marmar, Dale Meade, Gerry Navratil,Ned Sauthoff, Tony Taylor, Glenn Wurden

6 ITER Outyear Funding Profile 200646.03.549.5 2007130.016.0146.0 2008182.018.8200.8 2009191.016.5207.5 2010189.010.3199.3 2011151.09.3160.3 2012120.06.2126.2 2013 29.0 3.4 32.4 Total1,038.084.01,122.0 U.S. Contributions to ITER - Annual Profile ($ in Millions – in as spent dollars) *Discussions are under way about whether ITER Preparations funding in FY 2006 of $6M should be accounted for within the ITER Total Project Cost (TPC). * Fiscal Year Total Estimated Costs (TEC) Other Project Costs (OPC) Total Project Costs (TPC)

7 Three Cases Considered for FY 06 - 07 FY 05 FY 06FY 07 Case 2 (Constrained) 17 weeks 12 weeks Case 3 (Optimized) 17 weeks Case 1 (Base - Low) 17 weeks 12 weeks Case 1- Base case causes delay of eight months in experimental progress Case 2- Constrained case allows steady experimental progress Case 3- Optimized case allows good facility utilization and future investments

8

9

10

11

12

13


Download ppt "Supported by NSTX Team Meeting March 23, 2005 Columbia U Comp-X GA INEL JHU LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google