1. From Model Interoperability to Data Transformation Steve Grise ESRI

2. 2 OverviewOverview Detailed approach for Schema mapping for Euroroads exampleDetailed approach for Schema mapping for Euroroads example Interoperability and semantics toolsInteroperability and semantics tools Some attempts at answers to questionsSome attempts at answers to questions

3. 3 EuroRoads for Geodatabase Created EuroRoads Geodatabase UML, exported to XMI, used ArcCatalog Schema wizard to create GeodatabaseCreated EuroRoads Geodatabase UML, exported to XMI, used ArcCatalog Schema wizard to create Geodatabase Started with Canadian National Road Network (NRN) data in GMLStarted with Canadian National Road Network (NRN) data in GML Mapped schema from NRN to EuroRoad target (data interoperability extension)Mapped schema from NRN to EuroRoad target (data interoperability extension) Downloaded GML sample for the Yukon TerritoryDownloaded GML sample for the Yukon Territory Created geoprocessing model to load the Yukon data into the modelCreated geoprocessing model to load the Yukon data into the model Used XML Schema tools in ArcGIS to create export datasetUsed XML Schema tools in ArcGIS to create export dataset

4. 4 EuroRoads for Geodatabase Usually start with an Analysis DiagramUsually start with an Analysis Diagram –Simplified UML –Stepping stone between ideas and implementation –Example from Ontario roads prototype below –Would do Analysis Diagram to handle the more complex event/attributes for implementation model for EuroRoadS

5. 5 EuroRoads for Geodatabase CASE Tool UML

6. 6 EuroRoads for Geodatabase CASE Tool UML

7. 7 EuroRoads for Geodatabase Mapping File (Road Node)Mapping File (Road Node)

8. 8 EuroRoads for Geodatabase

9. 9

10. 10 EuroRoads for Geodatabase XML Schema excerptXML Schema excerpt

11. Semantic Interoperability

12. 12 Catalogs and Searching Search supportSearch support –Thesauri –English/other Languages –Geo –Euro SDI –Key is management of terms and relationships between concepts in real datasets –W3C and other standards exist –Some key geo pieces missing –Standards needed in this area Basically the same problem as conceptual schema mapping, but done at the dataset/catalog level (and the feature level)Basically the same problem as conceptual schema mapping, but done at the dataset/catalog level (and the feature level)

13. 13 W3C Options XML SchemaXML Schema –Structure/hierarchies, i.e. “Family” Resource Description Framework (RDF), (RDFS)Resource Description Framework (RDF), (RDFS) –“Parents and children” Ontology Web Language (OWL)Ontology Web Language (OWL) –“Cousins” and other more complex relationships

14. 14 ResultsResults Better search resultsBetter search results –“parcel” search returns “Cadastre” –“Cadastral” search returns “Parcel”, “Corner”, other datasets –Some basic structure / semantics missing for Geo –Alexandria Digital Library –ISO Categories –… are both too general for Semantic Web needs (maybe even basic searches)

15. 15 A Few Tools ProtégéProtégé –Stanford, Open Source –Developed for medical ontology work (initially) –protégé.stanford.edu LegendBursterLegendBurster –GeoReference Online, Commercial tools –Developed for mineral exploration market (initially) –www.georeferenceonline.com

16. 16 Protégé Example

17. 17 LegendBurster Example TreeList EditorTreeList Editor –Standalone tool Query ToolsQuery Tools –Complex searches –Results stored as attribute –Complex mapping results

18. 18 LegendBurster Example

19. 19 SummarySummary Euroroads schema mappingEuroroads schema mapping –Implementation tools available –Alternative approach –Uml-xmi-gdb-xml (+ other) Need to work on semantics and relationships between datasetsNeed to work on semantics and relationships between datasets –Important for searching –Tools available –Small group should try to manage relationships

20. 20 Q&AQ&A Do conceptual modeling languages satisfy Geo needs?Do conceptual modeling languages satisfy Geo needs? –UML missing spatial patterns –UML probably too complex for most people –No other current alternative for graphical representation –Need to add simple, graphical examples to aid communication and comprehension –Consider information products and demonstration systems now, in parallel with CSL work Harmonize?Harmonize? –Content, not necessarily CSL –Keep it simple at first –Meta model for cataloging and searching between terms –Watch for mixing of concepts and formats

21. 21 Q&AQ&A Is a common conceptual schema needed?Is a common conceptual schema needed? –Challenge is to be convinced that it adds value, makes things easier for partners/designers –Should target more broad audience than Euro community UML extensions feasible?UML extensions feasible? –Conceptual models – yes –Transition to logical models should be considered

22. 22 Q&AQ&A Representing constraints?Representing constraints? –Difficult to get agreement on behavior other than basic data integrity constraints –Suggest keep this as simple as possible –Different technologies and architectures means major differences in logical models Relationship to Ontologies?Relationship to Ontologies? –Catalog/search tool problem for a small group of people –Start work on this now in parallel with other activities