Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010.

Published byCollin Cole Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010."— Presentation transcript:

1 Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010

2 Communication Arts, Math and Science Missouri Assessment Program (MAP) Grades 3-8 Scores are shown by “cohort” or by “program” – Cohort: Same group of students year to year – Program: Same grade level test given year to year MAP Index Points are used to illustrate performance and to calculate our overall points on the APR (Annual Performance Report)

3 Program Data Communication Arts 2009-3 rd Grade 2010-3 rd Grade (Different students each year)

4 Cohort Data: Communication Arts 2008-3 rd Grade 2009-4 th Grade 2010-5 th Grade (Same students each year)

5 Cohort Data: Communication Arts 2008-4 th Grade 2009-5 th Grade 2010-6 th Grade (Same students each year)

6 Cohort Data: Communication Arts 2008-5 th Grade 2009-6 th Grade 2010-7 th Grade (Same students each year)

7 Cohort Data: Communication Arts 2008-6 th Grade 2009-7 th Grade 2010-8 th Grade (Same students each year)

8 Program Data Mathematics 2009-3 rd Grade 2010-3 rd Grade (Different Students each year)

9 Cohort Data: Mathematics 2008-3 rd Grade 2009-4 th Grade 2010-5 th Grade (Same students each year)

10 Comparative Data: Mathematics 2008-4 th Grade 2009-5 th Grade 2010-6 th Grade (Same students each year)

11 Cohort Data: Mathematics 2008-5 th Grade 2009-6 th Grade 2010-7 th Grade (Same students each year)

12 Cohort Data: Mathematics 2008-6 th Grade 2009-7 th Grade 2010-8 th Grade (Same students each year)

13 Science MAP (5 th /8 th ) and End-of-Course Exams in Biology, Algebra I, English II and American Government Program data is presented from 2008-2010 The Science MAP is administered in 5 th and 8 th Grades End-of-Course Exams are administered at the end of each course. Again, MAP Index points are used to illustrate performance.

14 Program Data: 5 th Grade Science (Different students each year )

15 Program Data: 8 th Grade Science (Different students each year)

16 Program Data EOC Biology (Different students each year)

17 Program Data: EOC Algebra I (Different students each year)

18 Program Data: EOC English II (Different students each year)

19 EOC American Government (Baseline year)

20 Data Reported By Building We are a total district team and depend on each other for total district results (APR). While some buildings showed significant improvement, others did not. All schools experienced improvement in at least one area. The focus is on improvement and progress no matter where scores begin.

21 Building: Elementary Grade Three 2009-Grade Four 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 6 points (723.3 – 729.4) Eastwood Hills: Down 1 point (695.5-694.7) Fleetridge: Up 7 points (723.2-730.1) Laurel Hills: Up 11 points (694.4-705.7) Little Blue: Baseline year (735.7 and 703.3) Norfleet: Up 14 points (727.1-741.1) Robinson: Down 3 points(768.6-765.5) Southwood: Same (732.9-732.1) Spring Valley: Up 14 points (723.10-736.9) Westridge: Up 17 points (715.7-733.3)

22 Building: Elementary Grade Four 2009-Grade Five 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 4 points (740-743.7) Eastwood Hills: Down 14 points (731.7-717.6) Fleetridge: Down 1 point (755.6-754.8) Laurel Hills: Up 15 points (721.7-736.7) Little Blue: Baseline year (Grade Five: 757.10) Norfleet: Up 9 points (737-755.7) Robinson: Up 32 points (740.3-772.3) Southwood: Up 5 points (750.8-755.1) Spring Valley: Down 11 points (747.9-736.1) Westridge: Up 10 points (713.8-723.1)

23 Building: Middle School Grade Six 2009-Grade Seven 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Down 14 points (748.1-734.8) Raytown South Middle: Up 10 points (729.4-738.8) Raytown Central Middle: Up 15 points (745.4-760)

24 Building: Middle School Grade Seven 2009-Grade Eight 2010 Communication Arts Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Up 12 points (743.8-755.4) Raytown South Middle: Up 14 points (722.1-736.2) Raytown Central Middle: Up 5 points (762.6-767.3)

25 Building: Elementary Grade Three 2009-Grade Four 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Down 36 points (751.7-715.9) Eastwood Hills: Down 10 points (706.7-696.5) Fleetridge: Up 13 points (720.2-733.7) Laurel Hills: Up 17 points (691.7-708.5) Little Blue: Baseline year (724.3 and 716.4) Norfleet: Up 21 points (735.7-756.2) Robinson: Down 13 points (780-767.2) Southwood: Up 2 points (726.1-728.3) Spring Valley: Up 27 points (725.6-752.3) Westridge: Down 5 points (733.7-728.2)

26 Building: Elementary Grade Four 2009-Grade Five 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Blue Ridge: Up 3 points (736.9-739.4) Eastwood Hills: Down 4 points (730.2-726.5) Fleetridge: Up 5 points (744-759.5) Laurel Hills: Up 22 points (718.5-740.5) Little Blue: Baseline year (Grade Five: 765.7) Norfleet: Up 25 points (740.7-765) Robinson: Up 29 points (751.4-780) Southwood: Up 26 points (727-753.1) Spring Valley: Up 22 points (720.5-742.6) Westridge: Up 20 points (717.2-736.9)

27 Building: Middle School Grade Six 2009-Grade Seven 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Down 17 points (746.9-729.2) Raytown South Middle: Up 6 points (735.1-741.6) Raytown Central Middle: Down 7 points (759.4-751.1)

28 Building: Middle School Grade Seven 2009-Grade Eight 2010 Mathematics Cohort Data Raytown Middle: Up 10 points (730-740.2) Raytown South Middle: Down 7 points (723.4-716.6) Raytown Central Middle: Up 6 points (750.9-756.5)

29 Building: Elementary Grade Five 2009-Grade Five 2010 Science Program Data Blue Ridge: Same (733.3-733.8) Eastwood Hills: Up 17 points (700-717.6) Fleetridge: Up 31 points (725.3-756) Laurel Hills: Up 40 points (693.3-733.3) Little Blue: Baseline year (744.3) Norfleet: Up 7 points (752.3-760) Robinson: Up 35 points (744-778.5) Southwood: Down 7 points (727.4-720.4) Spring Valley: Up 7 points (716.3-723) Westridge: Down 7 points (723.3-716.9)

30 Building: Middle School Grade Eight 2009-Grade Eight 2010 Science Program Data Raytown Middle: Up 2 points (717.3-719.1) Raytown South Middle: Up 2 points (705.4-707.5) Raytown Central Middle: Up 21 points (723.4-744)

31 Middle School EOC Algebra I Program Data 2009-2010 Raytown Middle: Up 7 points (796.6-803.8) Raytown South Middle: Up 2 points (797-798.6) Raytown Central Middle: Up 15 points (817.4-832)

32 High School EOC Algebra I Program Data 2009-2010 (Different students each year) Raytown High: Up 7 points (710.9-727.7) Raytown South High: Up 9 points (704.4-713.8) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

33 High School EOC Biology Program Data 2009-2010 (Different students each year) Raytown High: Down 22 points (755.7-734.1) Raytown South High: Up 2 points (725.3-726.8) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

34 High School EOC English II Program Data 2009-2010 (Different students each year) Raytown High: English II: Up 17 points (757-773.7) Raytown South High: English II: Same (760.7-760.4) NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

35 High School EOC American Government Program Data 2010 Baseline Raytown High: 722.3 Raytown South High: 692.4 NOTE: These scores may be incorrect due to administration error

36 2010 APR Score: 11 All areas MET with the exception of:  3-5 Mathematics (Missed by 4 status points)  ACT (Missed by one point)  Attendance (Missed by 6 tenths of a point)

37 What’s Next? District and Building Professional Development areas – PLC/Collaboration – Differentiation/Structure – Assessment/Data (Data Collection) District PD classes Evaluation/Collection of Work Samples eSource

Download ppt "Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010."

Similar presentations

Mt. Diablo Unified School District

Mt. Diablo Unified School District
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Testing for 2011-2012 STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support 832-386-1044

Testing for STAAR/EOC, TAKS Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.

NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.
1 2011 Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC

Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
1 2011 Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.

2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.

State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Spring 2009 Training End-of-Course Field Test. Schedule of Important Dates for 2009 Field Test Event Spring Field Test Window -- April 27 – May 15 EventSchedule.

Spring 2009 Training End-of-Course Field Test. Schedule of Important Dates for 2009 Field Test Event Spring Field Test Window -- April 27 – May 15 EventSchedule.
PARCC – Regular Administration Grades 3-8 Administration Dates April 4, 2016 – May 13, 2016 (Paper-based administration: April 11, 2016 – April 22, 2016)

PARCC – Regular Administration Grades 3-8 Administration Dates April 4, 2016 – May 13, 2016 (Paper-based administration: April 11, 2016 – April 22, 2016)
Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children David Holdzkom Assistant Superintendent - Evaluation & Research Ken Branch Senior Director.

Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children David Holdzkom Assistant Superintendent - Evaluation & Research Ken Branch Senior Director.
1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.

1. 2 What tests will students have to take? High School COURSES with EOCs MathEnglishScienceSoc. Studies Algebra I Geometry Algebra II Eng. I-R&W Eng.
School Performance Score Elementary School - October 2013 i LEAP Grade 3 LEAP Grade 4 Assessment Points * 150Advanced 125Mastery 100Basic 0Approaching.

School Performance Score Elementary School - October 2013 i LEAP Grade 3 LEAP Grade 4 Assessment Points * 150Advanced 125Mastery 100Basic 0Approaching.
Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013.

Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.

Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.

Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
September 11, 2014.  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.

September 11,  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) ◦ Reading and math were tested every year in grades 3 through 8. ◦ Writing was tested in.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google