1. 1 Hgg Cut based Analysis update Jim Branson, Chris Palmer, Marco Pieri, Matteo Sani, Sean Simon

2. 2 Introduction Trying to address the guidelines for Higgs Review from Higgs conveners Oct 12 th Description of analysis Sequential cuts plots and yields N-1 plots and final plots for all variables Categories Measurement of efficiency and photon variables distributions with electrons with Z->ee Systematic uncertainties Sensitivity for 1fb-1 Fermiophobic Higgs interpretation Summary of results

3. 3 Description of Analysis Main background – Born/Box (irreducible) – Gamma+Jets (reducible) – QCD (reducible) Strategy – Remove nearly all reducible bkg – Separate into useful categories (in eta, R9, and possibly Ptgammagamma)

4. 4 Loose Pre-Selection For now using all Photon HLT paths – Very small effect expected – preselection tighter than cuts Spike Cleaning from 38X RECO Lead p T > 30 GeV, Sublead p T > 20 GeV 0 < |  | < 2.5 – H/E < 0.1 – Track Iso hollow DR03 < 7.0 + 0.002*p T – Ecal Iso DR03 < 8.4 + 0.012*p T – Hcal Iso DR03 < 4.4+ 0.005*p T

5. 5 Cut-Based Selection Lead p T > 40 GeV, Sublead p T > 30 GeV 0 < |  | < 1.4442 or 1.566 < |  | < 2.5 (we would like to take it out) – H/E < 0.02 –  i  i  < 0.01(EB) 0.028(EE) – Pixel Veto – Track Iso hollow DR04 < 1.5 + 0.001*p T – Ecal Iso DR04 < 2.0 + 0.006*p T – Hcal Iso DR04 < 2.0 + 0.0025*p T

6. 6 Disclaimer on sequential cuts and other plots Sequential cuts are applied (on the two photons at the same time) After preselection lack of MC attributed to the Gen level Filter – Ratio of filtered to unfiltered for GamJet gam + fake is 0.74 before cuts and 1 after cuts – Not measured for QCD For now use old PTDR K-Factors for BG and constant K-factor for Higgs Signal (standard cross sections used in CMS) Mass cut at 100 GeV is applied to account for generator level mass cut in QCD and Gamma+Jet samples

7. 7 Sequential Cuts Plots – 0) Preselection – 1) p T – 2) Track Iso – 3) Ecal Iso – 4) Hcal Iso – 5)  i  i  – 6) Pixel Veto – 7) H/E – 8)  -Gap 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Cut names

8. 8 Sequential Cuts - Leading Photon More leading Photon variables in Backup

9. 9 Lead p T

10. 10 Lead  i  i 

11. 11 Lead R9

12. 12 Sequential Cuts - Subleading Photon More Subleading Photon variables in Backup

13. 13 Sublead p T

14. 14 Sublead  i  i 

15. 15 Sublead R9

16. 16 Sequential Cuts – Diphoton Variables More Diphoton variables in Backup

17. 17 Sequential Cuts M 

18. 18 Sequential Cuts p T 

19. 19 Sequential Cuts – Tables Data/MC comparison 100-250 GeV Mass Range Data/MC Comparison in 120±5 GeV window (tables for masses 105,110,115,130, and 140 in Backup) Signal Expectation and Efficiency & Expected Background under peak at 120 GeV for ∫L=1fb - 1 (tables for 110,115,130, and 140 in Backup)

20. Data ∑MC bkgd  -Born  -Box  Jet QCD Drell- Yan Preselection 2.28E+041.22E+04136.845.591268 1.03E+0 4 462.8 pTpT 76154969110.435.2870.53561392.2 Track Iso 1519113990.1328.03289.1412.9319.1 Ecal Iso 827801.186.8926.83197.3187.6302.4 Hcal Iso 73272385.7326.44172.6140.3298 iiii 555576.683.5925.69118.862.42286.1 Pixel Veto 189213.471.3322.6784.8334.50.06766 H/E 166196.868.0121.778.1828.860.06766  Gap 156186.164.4320.7274.2226.70.06766 20 Data/MC Comparison Mass Window 100-250 GeV ∫L = 34.7 pb -1 PTDR K-Factors

21. 21 Data ∑MC bkgd  - Born  -Box  Jet QCDZee Preselection 3192164119.67.6204.61351.058.0 pTpT 107667215.35.9141.6458.450.4 Track Iso 19216112.54.746.256.341.4 Ecal Iso 10411112.14.431.123.339.5 Hcal Iso 9498.811.94.426.916.638.9 iiii 6977.711.64.218.16.737.1 Pixel Veto 2730.110.03.812.63.80.0 H/E 2527.69.53.611.43.00.0  Gap 2426.29.03.510.82.90.0 Data/MC Event Yields in Mass Window 120±5 GeV for ∫L=34.7pb -1 Tables for 110, 115, 130 and 140 in Backup Slides PTDR K-Factors

22. 22 Signal Yield and Efficiency @ M H = 120 GeV for ∫L=1fb -1 M H = 120 GeV Signal  CUT  ALL Background/GeV at 120 Preselection 29.350.674 4730 pTpT 25.640.8740.5891935 Track Iso 20.860.8130.479464.2 Ecal Iso 19.90.9540.457318.3 Hcal Iso 19.590.9840.450284.6 iiii 18.740.9570.431223.9 Pixel Veto 16.610.8860.38286.73 H/E 15.790.9510.36379.41  Gap 15.020.9510.34575.47 Tables for 110, 115, 130 and 140 in Backup Slides PTDR K-Factors

23. 23 N-1 Plots – Lead Photon Mass Cut at 100 GeV applied Lead Photon – More plots in Backup

24. 24 Lead p T (N-1) Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

25. 25 Lead p T Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

26. 26 Lead  i  i  (N-1)  i  i   Signal x 100

27. 27 Lead  i  i   i  i   Signal x 100

28. 28 N-1 Plots – sublead photon Mass Cut at 100 GeV applied Sublead Photon – More plots in Backup

29. 29 Sublead p T (N-1) Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

30. 30 Sublead p T Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

31. 31 Sublead  i  i  (N-1)  i  i   Signal x 100

32. 32 Sublead  i  i   i  i   Signal x 100

33. 33 Photon Categories Photon Categories – More plots in Backup We have different possibilities: – R9 (worst photon determines the diphoton category) 2 cats: split at 0.93 3 cats: split at 0.90 and 0.95 – |Eta| (larger |eta| determines the diphoton category) 2 cats split barrrel/endcap 4 cats split 0.9, barrel/endcaps, 2.1 – Ptgammagamma 2 cats 40 GeV 3 cats 25 GeV and 50 GeV From these for now show (some in backup): – 4,6,12 cat R9, eta – 4 R9.eta x 2,3 Ptgamgam

34. 34 All Selected Events SIGNAL x 10

35. 35 SIGNAL x 100 All Selected Events

36. 36 2 R9 x 2 Eta SIGNAL x 10

37. Signal In Categories 2R9 x 2 Eta 37 Fraction of events (M H = 120 GeV) Categor y Total Signal Gluon Fusion VB F Assoc. Prod. Background in Mass Window 00.3460.3440.3750.3320.212 10.3250.3270.3260.2950.294 20.170 0.1580.1980.237 30.159 0.1420.1750.257

38. 38 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 10

39. 39 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 10

40. Signal In Categories 2R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  40 Fraction of events (M H = 120 GeV) Categor y Total Signal Gluon Fusion VB F Assoc. Prod. Background in Mass Window 00.1400.1210.3010.2670.045 10.1190.1030.2530.2250.060 20.0630.0540.1200.1460.061 30.0550.0480.1060.1260.054 40.2060.2230.0740.0650.167 50.2070.2240.0730.0700.234 60.1080.1160.0380.0520.175 70.1030.1110.0350.0490.203 Hi R9 Lo R9 Hi R9 Lo R9 Hi R9 Lo R9 Hi R9 Lo R9 EB EE EB EE Hi p T  Lo p T 

41. 41 Photon Efficiency with Z Tag and Probe All results are (will appear) in: – CMS AN-2010/292 -- Photon Efficiency Measurements using Tag and Probe Factorized T&P

42. 42 Also study photon variables for electrons with pileup as function of NVTX

43. 43 Background Estimate from Sidebands For now Exponential is fit to the mass distribution Still need to properly take out Higgs Mass hypothesis region Statistical error from the fit used in CLs method random experiments

44. 44 Signal systematic error Using for now 12.5% quoted by N. Chanon

45. 45 Sensitivity for 1 fb-1 REMAKE

46. 46 Fermiophobic Higgs Only use information from Ptgamgam Analysis is exactly the same as SM one For now use 8 categories: – 2 R9 – 2 |eta| – 2 Ptgamgam For now extrapolate/interpolate sigma/BR

47. 47 Fermiophobic H cross sections and BR (pb) Mass (GeV)VBFWH+ZHBR FFVBF*BR (ZH+WH) *BR 851.923.080.671.282.06 901.802.560.410.731.04 951.692.150.250.430.54 1001.601.820.160.260.29 1051.511.550.110.16 1101.441.330.070.100.09 1151.361.160.050.060.05 1201.301.010.030.040.03 REMAKE

48. 48 Looking at the data Using 34.7 pb-1 Fundamental disclaimer: IT MAY BE WRONG IN MANY PLACES – Need cross checking Only have mass points at 90 and 110 GeV Approximate signal shape at other masses Approximate sigma and BR For the plots use 90 GeV (optimistic) Signal and BG syst errors included Mass resolution error probably optimistic (Need laser corrections)

49. 49 Fermiophobic Higgs Exclusion Very-very preliminary REMAKE

50. 50 Summary SM inclusive analysis in rather good shape Checks on mass resolution ongoing in DPG Will check better sensitivity and current fermiophobic 1-CL result Should cross check with others

51. 51 Backup

52. 52 Sequential Cuts - Leading Photon More leading Photon variables in Backup

53. 53 Lead Pixel Veto

54. 54 Lead Track Isolation

55. 55 Lead Ecal Isolation

56. 56 Lead Ecal Isolation

57. 57 Lead Hcal Isolation

58. 58 Lead p T

59. 59 Lead p T

60. 60 Lead  i  i 

61. 61 Lead  i  i 

62. 62 Lead H/E

63. 63 Lead  Gap

64. 64 Lead R9

65. 65 Lead R9

66. 66 Sequential Cuts - Subleading Photon More Subleading Photon variables in Backup

67. 67 Sublead Pixel Veto

68. 68 Sublead Track Isolation

69. 69 Sublead Ecal Isolation

70. 70 Sublead Ecal Isolation

71. 71 Sublead Hcal Isolation

72. 72 Sublead p T

73. 73 Sublead p T

74. 74 Sublead  i  i 

75. 75 Sublead  i  i 

76. 76 Sublead H/E

77. 77 Sublead  -Gap

78. 78 Sublead R9

79. 79 Sublead R9

80. 80 Sequential Cuts – Diphoton Variables More Diphoton variables in Backup

81. 81 Sequential Cuts M 

82. 82 Sequential Cuts p T 

83. 83 Sequential Cuts p T 

84. 84 Sequential Cuts  

85. 85 Sequential Cuts  

86. 86 Sequential Cuts cos(  *)

87. 87 Data ∑MC bkgd  - Born  -Box  Jet QCDZee Preselection 41672141.0 26.311.2295.21680.0128.4 pTpT 1437892.8 19.58.1191.7566.5107.0 Track Iso 338239.6 16.06.561.667.188.3 Ecal Iso 192178.0 15.46.241.231.583.6 Hcal Iso 179164.9 15.26.136.424.682.5 iiii 143137.7 14.85.924.313.179.6 Pixel Veto 4042.9 12.65.217.27.80.0 H/E 3739.4 12.15.015.86.50.0  Gap 3737.3 11.44.814.96.10.0 Data/MC Event Yields in Mass Window 110±5 GeV for ∫L=34.7pb -1 PTDR K-Factors

88. 88 Data ∑MC bkgd  - Born  -Box  Jet QCDZee Preselection 35841873.022.69.2249.31509.083.1 pTpT 1217772.517.46.8166.0511.371.0 Track Iso 263195.114.25.453.763.458.4 Ecal Iso 143138.213.75.235.428.855.2 Hcal Iso 134126.013.55.131.022.054.4 iiii 102102.413.15.020.511.452.5 Pixel Veto 4137.311.24.414.77.00.0 H/E 3934.210.74.213.75.50.0  Gap 3832.410.24.013.05.30.0 Data/MC Event Yields in Mass Window 115±5 GeV for ∫L=34.7pb -1 PTDR K-Factors

89. 89 Data ∑MC bkgd  - Born  -Box  Jet QCDZee Preselection 24941314.015.75.2144.11115.034.5 pTpT 817540.212.74.1102.2390.231.0 Track Iso 182118.110.43.233.346.824.4 Ecal Iso 9478.310.03.122.619.722.8 Hcal Iso 8070.09.93.119.714.822.6 iiii 5454.59.63.013.26.921.9 Pixel Veto 2623.98.22.69.53.60.0 H/E 2222.37.92.58.63.30.0  Gap 1921.37.52.48.33.20.0 Data/MC Event Yields in Mass Window 130±5 GeV for ∫L=34.7pb -1 PTDR K-Factors

90. 90 Data ∑MC bkgd  - Born  -Box  Jet QCDZee Preselection 20191065.0 12.33.7106.7919.522.9 pTpT 637440.3 10.33.077.1328.921.0 Track Iso 11289.3 8.42.425.736.316.5 Ecal Iso 5260.4 8.02.317.217.315.7 Hcal Iso 4453.3 7.92.315.012.715.4 iiii 3739.7 7.72.210.64.314.9 Pixel Veto 2018.2 6.51.97.32.40.0 H/E 1617.1 6.31.96.72.30.0  Gap 1616.1 5.91.86.51.90.0 Data/MC Event Yields in Mass Window 140±5 GeV for ∫L=34.7pb -1 PTDR K-Factors

91. 91 M H = 110 GeV Signal  CUT  ALL Background/GeV at 110 Preselection 29.420.64986169.0 pTpT 24.540.54212573.0 Track Iso 20.030.4423690.4 Ecal Iso 19.110.4221512.8 Hcal Iso 18.810.4154475.2 iiii 17.990.3973396.8 Pixel Veto 15.950.3523123.6 H/E 15.160.3348113.4  Gap 14.440.3188107.4 Signal Yield and Efficiency @ M H = 110 GeV for ∫L=1fb -1 PTDR K-Factors

92. 92 M H = 115 GeV Signal  CUT  ALL Background/GeV at 115 Preselection 29.750.6645398.0 pTpT 25.390.56662226.0 Track Iso 20.650.4608562.2 Ecal Iso 19.670.439398.3 Hcal Iso 19.370.4324363.1 iiii 18.550.414295.2 Pixel Veto 16.430.3667107.4 H/E 15.630.348998.5  Gap 14.890.332393.5 Signal Yield and Efficiency @ M H = 115 GeV for ∫L=1fb -1 PTDR K-Factors

93. 93 M H = 130 GeV Signal  CUT  ALL Background/GeV at 130 Preselection 25.680.68953787 pTpT 23.050.61871557 Track Iso 18.80.5047340.3 Ecal Iso 17.930.4813225.6 Hcal Iso 17.640.4736201.7 iiii 16.920.4543157.1 Pixel Veto 150.402668.93 H/E 14.250.382564.31  Gap 13.540.363461.51 Signal Yield and Efficiency @ M H = 130 GeV for ∫L=1fb -1 PTDR K-Factors

94. 94 M H = 140 GeV Signal  CUT  ALL Background/GeV at 140 Preselection 19.420.70493069 pTpT 17.790.64571269 Track Iso 14.490.5258257.3 Ecal Iso 13.850.5027174.2 Hcal Iso 13.620.4945153.7 iiii 13.070.4744114.5 Pixel Veto 11.610.421452.44 H/E 11.040.400849.39  Gap 10.520.381846.29 Signal Yield and Efficiency @ M H = 140 GeV for ∫L=1fb -1 PTDR K-Factors

95. Data ∑MC bkgd  -Born  -Box  Jet QCD Drell- Yan Preselection 2.28E+041.21E+0491.223812061.03E+04462.8 pTpT 7615488673.629.34829.63561392.2 Track Iso 1519107660.0723.36260.2412.9319.1 Ecal Iso 827740.857.9122.36170.6187.6302.4 Hcal Iso 732663.957.1422.04146.5140.3298 iiii 555519.355.7221.4193.6462.42286.1 Pixel Veto 189164.447.5618.963.434.50.06766 H/E 166150.145.3518.0957.7128.860.06766  Gap 156141.742.9617.2754.6726.70.06766 95 Data/MC Comparison Mass Window 100-250 GeV ∫L = 34.7 pb -1 No K-Factors

96. 96 Data ∑MC bkg d  - Born  -Box  Jet QCD Preselection 31921624 pTpT 1076659.2 Track Iso 192151.9 Ecal Iso 104101.8 Hcal Iso 9490.29 iiii 6969.44 Pixel Veto 2723.03 H/E 2520.87  Gap 2419.83 Data/MC Event Yields in Mass Window 120±5 GeV for ∫L=34.7pb -1 No K-Factors

97. 97 Signal Yield and Efficiency @ M H = 120 GeV for ∫L=1fb -1 M H = 120 GeV Signal  CUT  ALL Background/GeV at 120 Preselection 29.40.674 4680 pTpT 25.60.8740.5891900 Track Iso 20.90.8130.479437.8 Ecal Iso 19.90.9540.457293.4 Hcal Iso 19.60.9840.450260.2 iiii 18.70.9570.431200.1 Pixel Veto 16.60.8860.38266.38 H/E 15.80.9510.36360.13  Gap 15.00.9510.34557.16 No K-Factors

98. 98 N-1 Plots – Lead Photon Lead Photon – More plots in Backup

99. 99 Lead p T (N-1) Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

100. 100 Lead p T Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

101. 101 Lead  (N-1) Suoercluster  or  Signal x 100

102. 102 Lead  Suoercluster  or  Signal x 100

103. 103 Lead H/E (N-1) H/E < 0.02 Signal x 100

104. 104 Lead H/E H/E < 0.02 Signal x 100

105. 105 Lead  i  i  (N-1)  i  i   Signal x 100

106. 106 Lead  i  i   i  i   Signal x 100

107. 107 Lead Pixel Veto (N-1) Veto Pixel Seed Signal x 100

108. 108 Lead Pixel Veto Veto Pixel Seed Signal x 100

109. 109 Lead Track Isolation (N-1) Track Sum p T (Hollow  R < 0.4) < 1.5 + 0.001*p T Signal x 100

110. 110 Lead Track Isolation Track Sum p T (Hollow  R < 0.4) < 1.5 + 0.001*p T Signal x 100

111. 111 Lead Ecal Isolation (N-1) Ecal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.006*p T Signal x 100

112. 112 Lead Ecal Isolation Ecal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.006*p T Signal x 100

113. 113 Lead Hcal Isolation (N-1) Hcal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.0025*p T Signal x 100

114. 114 Lead Hcal Isolation Hcal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.0025*p T Signal x 100

115. 115 N-1 Plots – sublead photon Sublead Photon – More plots in Backup

116. 116 Sublead p T (N-1) Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

117. 117 Sublead p T Lead p T > 40 GeV Signal x 100

118. 118 Sublead  (N-1) Suoercluster  or  Signal x 100

119. 119 Sublead  Suoercluster  or  Signal x 100

120. 120 Sublead H/E (N-1) H/E < 0.02 Signal x 100

121. 121 Sublead H/E H/E < 0.02 Signal x 100

122. 122 Sublead  i  i  (N-1)  i  i   Signal x 100

123. 123 Sublead  i  i   i  i   Signal x 100

124. 124 Sublead Pixel Veto (N-1) Veto Pixel Seed Signal x 100

125. 125 Sublead Pixel Veto Veto Pixel Seed Signal x 100

126. 126 Sublead Track Isolation (N-1) Track Sum p T (Hollow  R < 0.4) < 1.5 + 0.001*p T Signal x 100

127. 127 Sublead Track Isolation Track Sum p T (Hollow  R < 0.4) < 1.5 + 0.001*p T Signal x 100

128. 128 Sublead Ecal Isolation (N-1) Ecal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.006*p T Signal x 100

129. 129 Sublead Ecal Isolation Ecal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.006*p T Signal x 100

130. 130 Sublead Hcal Isolation (N-1) Hcal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.0025*p T Signal x 100

131. 131 Sublead Hcal Isolation Hcal Sum E T (  R < 0.4) < 2.0 + 0.0025*p T Signal x 100

132. 132 Photon Categories Photon Categories – More plots in Backup We have different possibilities: – R9 (worst photon determines the diphoton category) 2 cats: split at 0.93 3 cats: split at 0.90 and 0.95 – |Eta| (larger |eta| determines the diphoton category) 2 cats split barrrel/endcap 4 cats split 0.9, barrel/endcaps, 2.1 – Ptgammagamma 2 cats 40 GeV 3 cats 25 GeV and 50 GeV From these for now show (some in backup): – 4,6,12 cat R9, eta – 4 R9.eta x 2,3 Ptgamgam

133. 133 3 R9 x 4 Eta SIGNAL x 10

134. Signal In Categories 3R9 x 4 Eta 134 Fraction of events (M H = 120 GeV) Categor y Total Signal Gluon Fusion VB F Assoc. Prod. Background in Mass Window 00.131 0.1440.1210.060 10.0940.0930.1030.0920.058 20.0980.0990.1000.0840.076 30.0940.0930.1000.0930.074 4 0.0830.0790.061 50.1790.1810.1710.1590.178 60.069 0.0670.0760.077 70.055 0.0660.067 80.101 0.0890.1070.152 90.054 0.0470.0660.085 100.022 0.0190.0270.055 110.029 0.0220.0320.059

135. Categories 135

136. No Categories All Events Mass Plots – Signal Stacked – Signal Out Front 136

137. 137 All Selected Events SIGNAL x 10

138. 138 SIGNAL x 100 All Selected Events

139. 4 Categories 4 Categories Mass Plots – Signal Stacked – Signal Out Front – Fine Binning (Signal Out Front) – Category Table 139

140. 140 2 R9 x 2 Eta SIGNAL x 10

141. 141 2 R9 x 2 Eta SIGNAL x 10

142. 142 2 R9 x 2 Eta SIGNAL x 10

143. Signal In Categories 2R9 x 2 Eta 143 Fraction of events (M H = 120 GeV) Categor y Total Signal Gluon Fusion VB F Assoc. Prod. Background in Mass Window 00.3460.3440.3750.3320.212 10.3250.3270.3260.2950.294 20.170 0.1580.1980.237 30.159 0.1420.1750.257

144. 8 Categories 8 Categories Mass Plots – Signal Stacked – Signal Out Front – Fine Binning (Signal Out Front) – Category Table 144

145. 145 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 10

146. 146 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 10

147. 147 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 10

148. Signal In Categories 2R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  148 Fraction of events (M H = 120 GeV) Categor y Total Signal Gluon Fusion VB F Assoc. Prod. Background in Mass Window 00.1400.1210.3010.2670.045 10.1190.1030.2530.2250.060 20.0630.0540.1200.1460.061 30.0550.0480.1060.1260.054 40.2060.2230.0740.0650.167 50.2070.2240.0730.0700.234 60.1080.1160.0380.0520.175 70.1030.1110.0350.0490.203 Hi R9 Lo R9 Hi R9 Lo R9 Hi R9 Lo R9 Hi R9 Lo R9 EB EE EB EE Hi p T  Lo p T 

149. 8 Categories 8 Categories DiPhoton P T Plots – Signal Stacked and Scaled by 10 – Signal Out Front and Scaled by 50 149

150. 150 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 10

151. 151 2 R9 x 2 Eta x 2 p T  SIGNAL x 50

152. EXTRA 12 Categories Mass Plots – Signal Stacked – Signal Out Front – Fine Binning (Signal Out Front) – category table 152

153. 153 3 R9 x 4 Eta SIGNAL x 10

154. 154 3 R9 x 4 Eta SIGNAL x 10

155. 155 3 R9 x 4 Eta SIGNAL x 10

156. Signal In Categories 3R9 x 4 Eta 156 Fraction of events (M H = 120 GeV) Categor y Total Signal Gluon Fusion VB F Assoc. Prod. Background in Mass Window 00.131 0.1440.1210.060 10.0940.0930.1030.0920.058 20.0980.0990.1000.0840.076 30.0940.0930.1000.0930.074 4 0.0830.0790.061 50.1790.1810.1710.1590.178 60.069 0.0670.0760.077 70.055 0.0660.067 80.101 0.0890.1070.152 90.054 0.0470.0660.085 100.022 0.0190.0270.055 110.029 0.0220.0320.059