1. Right on Track towards a safe and interoperable Europe? 2 April 2014 Luc Lallemand Vice President EIM CEO Infrabel Belgium Rail Infrastructure Manager

2. 2Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe02.04.2014 1. BELGIUM: WHERE ETCS IS A PRIORITY

3. 1.1 ETCS in the Infrabel strategy 1. BELGIUM: WHERE ETCS IS A PRIORITY SAFETY PUNCTUALITY PUNCTUALITY CAPACITY BREAK EVEN COMPANY ON LINE WITH SOCIETY 123 4 5 3Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe02.04.2014 ETCS supports 5 key priorities

4. Current situation: Further deployment of TBL1+ and ETCS level 1 1.2 Timeline of ETCS deployment 402.04.2014Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe 1. BELGIUM: WHERE ETCS IS A PRIORITY STEP 1 STEP 2 2015 2022 2025 2030 2035 2014 Goal achieved: all railway traffic ETCS protected Overview of ETCS migration strategy – key milestones TBL 1+, a first step to ETCS A system which controls the speed of the train 300 m ahead of the signal. Speed > 40km/h, then the train’s emergency brake is applied. The train passes the sign, then it will be brought to a complete stop. TBL1+ program completed Entire network equipped with ETCS STEP 3 Network accessible for ETCS- equipped trains only STEP 4 Entire network equipped with ETCS level 2 TO BE DECIDED TO BE DECIDED

5. 502.04.2014Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe 1.3 Technical phasing of Infrabel’s safety strategy 1. BELGIUM: WHERE ETCS IS A PRIORITY The ETCS Master Plan includes a combination of 3 pillars: PILLAR 1 ETCS 1 (Version 2.3.0.d) Information transfer from track to train one way via balises Roll-out 2012-2022 Core network ETCS 2 (Version 2.3.0.d) Information exchange from track to train and vice versa via GSM-R Roll-out 2015-2022 Core network ETCS Limited Supervision (Baseline 3) ‘A la carte’ solution enabling selection of all functionalities that need to be implemented Information is forwarded via balises Roll-out 2018-2022 Secondary network PILLAR 2PILLAR 3

6. Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe 1.4 The relation between risk covering & global project cost 02.04.2014 SystemReference risk COST ESTIMATE 2010Total 2010Without ATP/ATC 100% 2022 Without ATP/ATC 170% TBL1+ 42% (25% of 170%) ETCS FS (on the entire network) 8,5%4.683 M€ MASTERPLAN 9,6%2.004 M€ The Master Plan presents approximately the same safety risk as ETCS Full Supervision The Master Plan plans to realise the entire project using 2.679 M€ less than ETCS Full Supervision Overall approach according to the expected evolution between 2010 and 2022 : Number of train-km travelled: + 28% Number of passengers: + 30% Network scope: + 7% Overall approach according to the expected evolution between 2010 and 2022 : Number of train-km travelled: + 28% Number of passengers: + 30% Network scope: + 7% 6 1. BELGIUM: WHERE ETCS IS A PRIORITY

7. 7Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe02.04.2014 2. ON TRACK TOWARDS A SAFE AND INTEROPERABLE EUROPE?

8. 2.1 Key success factors 02.04.2014Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe8 2. ON TRACK TOWARDS A SAFE AND INTEROPERABLE EUROPE? Strong commitments needed from all stakeholders System stability – ETCS specifications Timely development of Baseline 3 (necessary for ETCS Level 1 Limited Supervision) Guarantee permanent interoperability within version 2.3.0d A solution for GSM-R issues Interference caused by intrusion Development of ETCS over GPRS

9. Conclusion 02.04.2014Right on Track towards a safe & interoperable Europe9 S UCCESS ETCS Ambition Decisiveness Commitment