Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGiles Ray Modified over 9 years ago
1
Colette Holt & Associates Transportation Research Board of the National Academies 90th Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies 90th Annual Meeting Washington, D.C. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program: Private Sector Perspective on Legal Issues Colette Holt Attorney at Law 24 January 2011
2
Colette Holt & Associates 2 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective Accountability for Overall Goals Loss of remedial focus Failure to seriously think through what would the market look like “but for” discrimination Politically motivated methodologies to reduce goals Magical thinking about the effects of race-neutral approaches Failure to measure results Failure to provide adequate resources Unintended consequence: lower goals? Overall: support
3
Colette Holt & Associates 3 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Goal Submission Eases administrative burdens on recipients Reduces stakeholder input Reduces incentive & opportunity to revise goal setting methodologies Overall: support Focus on FTA & FAA recipients with fluctuating funding Review annual recipients’ reviews of progress towards meeting overall goals
4
Colette Holt & Associates 4 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Improving Program Oversight Weakest link in the DBE Program Problems Lack of on site monitoring Unauthorized DBE substitutions Slow or no pay Commercially useful function determinations Balkanization of responsibility: “DBE compliance is not the project manager’s job”
5
Colette Holt & Associates 5 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Sham joint ventures Brokers DBELO reporting to CEO on paper only Inadequate staff resources Inconsistent regional guidance Wishing will not make it so Increased training for regional offices Imposition of penalties for poor Program administration Criminal prosecutions filling the void Commercially useful function investigations indictments Lack of expertise of prosecutors confusion of Program standards Overall: support
6
Colette Holt & Associates 6 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Personal Net Worth Test Indexing long overdue Harmonizes Part 26 & Part 23 Retirement accounts are wealth “Illiquidity” argument is too broad Total exclusion will benefit the wealthiest & least disadvantaged DBEs racially disproportionate impact (i.e., helping white women) Reduce to present value No cap Overall: support
7
Colette Holt & Associates 7 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Interstate Certification Balancing act between administrative ease & Program integrity Rebuttable presumption reduces paperwork & provides an “out” for non-state UCP Burden should be an the applicant, per usual approach & stance of seeking a government benefit “Fast track” timetable may be difficult to follow Publicize that there is no “recertification”; review eligibility triennially; create USDOT database of denials & decerts Overall: support
8
Colette Holt & Associates 8 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Fostering Small Business Participation Critical element, too often honored in the discussion but not the execution; internal agency resistance Possible approaches Unbundling Small business setasides Waiving or reducing bonding State law issues? Federal solution?
9
Colette Holt & Associates 9 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. DBE Terminations & Substitutions Primes must receive prior approval Critical Program element Unauthorized substitutions may be the largest contract performance problem Reports of blatant discrimination Overall: support Counting DBE purchases & leases Current rule prohibits credit for items purchases from the prime Overall: support keeping present approach
10
Colette Holt & Associates 10 2010 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Private Sector Perspective, cont. Certification Issues NAICS codes Procedure for code removal Effect of code removal Eligibility on the basis of current capacities No unnecessary barriers reflecting future projections Certifications don’t lapse or expire Overall: support Do require periodic site visits Prohibit user fees from DBEs
11
Colette Holt & Associates 11 Litigation Update Kline v. Pocari & Maryland DOT Pleading stage New study & statute forthcoming mootness? AGC of San Diego v. Caltrans Expert reports filed Effect of exclusion of Hispanic & sub-continent Asian males? Kevcon v. US Expert reports filed Dismissed by plaintiff with prejudice
12
Colette Holt & Associates 12 Litigation Update, cont. Midwest Fence v. Illinois DOT & Illinois Tollway Pleading stage Both agencies have draft disparity studies Controlling case law upheld IDOT’s DBE Program in 2007
13
Colette Holt & Associates 13 Federal Railroad Administration Disparity Study RFI pending for study Challenges Data collection Non-DBE subcontractor payments Grantee records Role of Congressional record for Part 26? Regulatory structure like Part 26? Time for completion Cost Follow National TRB Guidelines? http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_644.pdf
14
Colette Holt & Associates 14 Colette Holt Attorney at Law 1730 North Clark Street Suite 4007 Chicago, IL 60614-5363 312.846.1438 (Office) 773.255.6844 (Cell) colette.holt@mwbelaw.com
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.