Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDaniel Francis Modified over 9 years ago
1
Overview of Adenoviral Vectors and Titer Determination
2
Historical Overview Identified in early 50’s Etiologic agent of the Common Cold et al? Linear dsDNA encapsidated in protein shell Over 100 in the Adenoviral group wt Adeno used as vaccine in military recruits
3
Virus Structure Icoshedral –20 surfaces –12 vertices 13% DNA 87% Protein NO LIPID
4
Gene Structure and Organization 2 origins of replication -ITR Transcription Units –5 “early” (E1A, E1B, E2, E3, E4) –2 “delayed early” (IVa2 and IX) –1 major late -> (L1-L5) ITR
5
Adenoviruses as Vectors Package up-to 105% Manipulate Circular Form
6
Adenovirus for Gene Therapy -Replication deficient -8kb foreign DNA -High titer production -Infect variety of tissues -High expression in non-replicating tissues
7
Evolution of Adenovectors –1st generation: E1- and E3 +/- –2nd generation: E1-, E2- or E4-, E3 +/- –Generation X: E1A+, E1B-, E3 +/- –Generation X.1: E1A and/or E1B conditional –Generation X.2: helper dependent Adenovirus for Gene Therapy EG Gene of Interest X
8
2nd Vector generations? Day 3Day 21 O’Neal, W.K. et al. Toxicological comparison of E2a-deleted and first-generation adenoviral vectors expressing a1-antitrypsin after systemic delivery. Human Gene Therapy, July 1998
9
Generation X.2? Morral, N, et al. High doses of helper-dependent adenoviral vector yield supraphysiological levels of a1-antitrypsin with negligible toxicity. Human Gene Therapy, Dec. 1998. weeks
10
Conclusions Adenoviruses can be converted into efficient gene transfer vehicles Adenoviral vectors are not inherently dangerous Not all adenoviral vectors have equivalent toxicity profiles The dose of vector delivered is related to the toxicity observed Standardization of dose specification is necessary
11
Characterization of Viral Vectors n Purity n Lack of contamination by adventitious agents, including RCV n Strength n The active concentration for toxicity and efficacy
12
Characterization of Viral Vector Strength Physical determination –1 OD 260 = 1.1 x 10e12 vp Biological determination –physical characteristics of the method distance and time likelihood of vector and cell meeting –functional characteristics of the system receptors detection
13
Typical Titer Set Up Culture Dish Virus Dilution Target Cells n Collision between Virus and Detector n Brownian motion n Concentration gradient n External forces
14
-9 -10 -11 -12 50 ul/ well -9 -10 -11 -12 100 ul/ well -9 -10 -11 -12 200 ul/ well Observed Positives 1.7 2.1 2.0 Calculated Titer 3.5 x10 11 2.1x10 11 9.8x10 10 gal - Static Titer Determination (vp= 8 x 10 12 ) 0.142cm0.284cm0.568cm
15
External Forces displacement 1 x gcentrifuged d = S RCF vt
16
Observed Positives 2.6 2.8 2.7 Calculated Titer 3.5 x10 11 2.1x10 11 9.8x10 1022 to 82 vp:iu Observed Positives 7.3 13.1 17.6 Calculated Titer 1.5 x10 12 1.3x10 12 8.8x10 115 to 9 vp:iu gal - Titer Determination after 90 min at 1000 RCF (0.398 cm) -9 -10 -11 -12 50 ul/ well -9 -10 -11 -12 100 ul/ well -9 -10 -11 -12 200 ul/ well 0.142cm0.284cm0.568cm
17
Single or Multiple Detection with Virion Displacement Pw = n (1 - e ) -(PC V t (d + I ) t ) [5] (PC t (d + I ) t ) V = - n (1 - ) Pw n 1 [6]
18
Observed Positives 2.6 2.8 2.7 Calculated NAS Titer 3.3 x10 12 4.2x10 12 6.4x10 121.3 to 2.4 vp:iu Observed Positives 7.3 13.1 17.6 Calculated NAS Titer 6.4 x10 12 5.4x10 12 4.3x10 121.3 to 1.9 vp:iu gal - Titer Determination after 90 min at 1000 RCF (0.398 cm) -9 -10 -11 -12 50 ul/ well -9 -10 -11 -12 100 ul/ well -9 -10 -11 -12 200 ul/ well 0.142cm0.284cm0.568cm
19
What: quantity, quality From bench to bedside –Original Titer V.P. vs I.U., PFU, FFU, etc –Clinical Titer – Nyberg-Hoffmann, C. and Aguilar-Cordova, E. Instability of adenoviral vectors during transport and its implication for clinical studies. Nature Medicine, August 1999
20
Need to Standardize Definition of how a product will behave –Benchmarks for comparing the toxicology and efficacy of the products Crucial for managing the manufacturing processes Crucial for maintaining consistent QC Crucial for dose escalation studies Crucial for a true product
21
Standard as an address not an absolute 2R1D 1L1D 2R2D 1L1D Fixed Point
22
Transduction MOI MOI*>10e16 MOI = 1
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.