1. Classroom Activity – Lesson 1: “Defining Terms”

2. “Capitalism” is identified by its characteristic institutions Institutions: the formal and informal “rules of the game” that shape incentives and outline expected and acceptable forms of behavior in social interaction. Private Property Rights Rule of law Open, competitive markets Entrepreneurship and innovation

3. Present ?Evidence? markets private property rule of law entrepreneurship ECONOMIC ANALYSIS clearly present – the component is present in the economy with few exceptions generally present – the component is present in the economy, but with many or significant exceptions generally absent – the component is only present in the economy in some limited forms clearly absent – the component is almost entirely excluded from the economy not enough information

4. United States The judiciary functions independently and predictably although serious constitutional questions have arisen regarding the government mandated health insurance decision. Corruption and cronyism is on the increase and is undermining the institutional integrity of the rule of law, resulting in an 86 th percentile ranking in control of corruption and a corruption perception index of 7.1 (out of 10) by Transparency International and a decrease of 4 points in the heritage Foundation score to 71 from a previous 75 in 2010. Property rights are guaranteed, although affected by increasing regulations, ranking the US 19 th in the world, with a score of 85 out of 100 by the Heritage Fndn.

5. Specific Situation: Apple Patent Victory Aug. 25, 2012 SAN JOSE, Calif.—Nine jurors delivered a sweeping victory to Apple Inc. in a high-stakes court battle against Samsung Electronics Co., awarding the Silicon Valley company $1.05 billion in damages and providing ammunition for more legal attacks on its mobile-device rivals. Jurors Friday found that Samsung infringed all but one of the seven patents at issue in the case—a patent covering the physical design of the iPad. They found all seven of Apple's patents valid—despite Samsung's attempts to have them thrown out. They also decided Apple didn't violate any of the five patents Samsung asserted in the case.

6. Present ?Evidence? markets private property rule of law entrepreneurship clearly present Prices and products determined in markets Patents upheld Courts act and decisions are enforced Millions of companies operate in every sector ECONOMIC ANALYSIS clearly present – the component is present in the economy with few exceptions generally present – the component is present in the economy, but with many or significant exceptions generally absent – the component is only present in the economy in some limited forms clearly absent – the component is almost entirely excluded from the economy not enough information

7. 2012 Country Scenario Updates

8. Capitalism is best thought of not as “a system,” but as a continuum of institutional combinations.... Less capitalist More capitalist

9. Capitalism is best thought of not as “a system,” but as a continuum of institutional combinations.... Some institutional forms confer benefits on the poor... and others do NOT. Less capitalist More capitalist

10. Heritage: www.heritage.org/index/

11. freetheworld.com – Index of Economic Freedom

12. Ranking Criteria: Size of government Legal system & Property rts Sound money Freedom to trade internationally Regulation

13. 1. Size of Government A. Government consumption B. Transfers and subsidies C. Government enterprises and investment D. Top marginal tax rate (i) Top marginal income tax rate (ii) Top marginal income and payroll tax rate Process: Identify quantifiable data that can be used to rank countries. Consider how these measures connect to the institutions we ranked in the “Will the Real Capitalism?” activity: markets, entrepreneurship

14. 2. Legal System and Property Rights A. Judicial independence B. Impartial courts C. Protection of property rights D. Military interference in rule of law and politics E. Integrity of the legal system F. Legal enforcement of contracts G. Regulatory restrictions on the sale of real property H. Reliability of police I. Business costs of crime rule of law, entrepreneurship, property rights

15. 3. Sound Money A. Money growth B. Standard deviation of inflation C. Inflation: most recent year D. Freedom to own foreign currency bank accounts entrepreneurship

16. 4. Freedom to Trade Internationally A. Tariffs (i) Revenue from trade taxes (% of trade sector) (ii) Mean tariff rate (iii) Standard deviation of tariff rates B. Regulatory trade barriers (i) Non-tariff trade barriers (ii) Compliance costs of importing and exporting C. Black-market exchange rates D. Controls of the movement of capital and people (i) Foreign ownership/investment restrictions (ii) Capital controls (iii) Freedom of foreigners to visit markets

17. 5.Regulation A. Credit market regulations (i) Ownership of banks (ii) Private sector credit (iii) Interest rate controls/ negative real interest rates B. Labor market regulations (i) Hiring regulations and minimum wage (ii) Hiring and firing regulations (iii) Centralized collective bargaining (iv) Hours regulations (v) Mandated cost of worker dismissal (vi) Conscription C. Business regulations (i) Administrative requirements (ii) Bureaucracy costs (iii) Starting a business (iv) Extra payments/ bribes/favoritism (v) Licensing restrictions (vi) Cost of tax compliance Markets, entrepreneurship

18. Hong Kong Finland Canada Chile Jordan U.S. Ireland Peru Israel Czech Republic Poland Uganda Malaysia Indonesia Belize Russia Egypt India Venezuela 10 9 8 7 6 5 Fraser Institute Index of Economic Freedom 2013 (Released Sept. 2013) Most Free: Hong Kong 8.97 Least Free: Venezuela 3.93 2011 data

19. Hong Kong Canada Finland Chile Ireland U.S. Jordan Peru Poland Uganda Israel Czech Republic Malaysia Indonesia Belize Russia Egypt India Venezuela 10 9 8 7 6 5 Fraser Institute Index of Economic Freedom 2012 (Released Sept. 2012) Most Free: Hong Kong 8.9 Least Free: Venezuela 4.07 2010 data

20. 2013 Rankings* (Out of 151) Hong Kong 1 Singapore 2 NZ 3 Switzerland 4 UAE 5 Mauritius 6 Finland 7 Bahrain 8 Canada 8 Australia 10 Chile 11 United Kingdom 12 Jordan 13 (42 in 2010, 62 2012) U.S. 17 (3 in 2006) Israel 49 (44 in 2007, 83 in 2011) Poland 59 (88 in 1990, 44 in 2012) Uganda 64 (67 in 2010, 51 in 2001, 113/113 in 1990) Greece 85 Kenya 87 Mexico 94 (69 in 2010) Russia 101 Egypt 108 (from high of 46, 80 in 2010) India 111 China 123 (82 in 2010) Iran 127 Ethiopia 142 Zimbabwe 149 Myanmar 151 Venezuela 152 *2010 Data * 2011 data

21. 2012 Rankings* (Out of 144) Hong Kong 1 Singapore 2 NZ 3 Switzerland 4 Australia 5 Canada 6 Bahrain 7 Mauritius 8 Finland 9 Chile 10 United Kingdom 12 Ireland 12 U.S. 18 (down from 3 in 2006) Japan 20 Poland 48 (88 in 1990) Uganda 50 (67 in 2010, 51 in 2001, 113/113 in 1990) Jordan 62 (42 in 2010) Greece 81 Mexico 91 (69 in 2010) Egypt 99 (from high of 46, 80 in 2010) Israel 52 (44 in 2007, 83 in 2011) Russia 95 China 107 (82 in 2010) India 111 Iran 111 Zimbabwe 142 Myanmar 143 Venezuela 144 *2010 Data * 2010 data

22. Africa Continues to Lag Behind: 1/3 of the world’s “extremely poor” What does recent research tell us about why Africa continues to lag behind – and what we can do about it?

23. Reduced Poverty Since 2000: Research on Growth vs. Safety Net ? 1.75% growth / 25% redistribution (Dollar, Kraay, Kleineberg study) context matters: averages hide wide range of variation safety net (redistribution) econ growth demographic comp.

24. Reduced Poverty Since 2000: Research on Growth vs. Safety Net ? 1. 75% growth / 25% redistribution (Dollar, Kraay, Kleineberg study) context matters: averages hide wide range of variation 2.economic growth is not generally associated with increased income inequality: the (overall) share of income going to the poorest 2 quintiles (40%) does not change significantly with growth poor governance often increases income inequality for specific populations in specific locations 3.4/5 of the improvements in the lives of the poorest 40% of the population over the past decade are attributable to economic growth; 1/5 is attributable to redistribution Talking about “Is Capitalism Good for the Poor?” distinguish between “poverty” v. “poor people” distinguish between treating symptoms v. underlying causes

25. Income Share of the Poorest 10% and Economic Freedom Sources: The Fraser Institute; The World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2013. Most Free ……………. Least Free

26. Income of the Poorest 10% and Economic Freedom Sources: The Fraser Institute; The World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2013. Most Free ……………. Least Free

27. Growth in Developing Nations Per Capita and Economic Freedom Quartile Sources: The Fraser Institute; The World Bank, World Development Indicators, 2013. Most Free ……………. Least Free %

28. Focus of lessons 2-5 in “Is Capitalism Good for the Poor?” Private Property Rights Rule of law Open, competitive markets Entrepreneurship and innovation Institutions Associated with Economic Growth