Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKristian Barnett Modified over 9 years ago
1
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Exploring Alternative Splicing Features using Support Vector Machines Jing Xia 1, Doina Caragea 1, Susan J. Brown 2 1 Computing and Information Sciences Kansas State University, USA 2 Bioinformatics Center Kansas State University, USA Jan 16 2008
2
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Outline 1 Background & Motivation 2 Problem & Feature Construction Problem Definition Data Set Feature Construction 3 Experiments Design & Results Experimental Design Experimental Results 4 Conclusions and Future Work Conclusion
3
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Alternative Splicing exonintronexonintronexon DNA 5’UTRGTAGGTAG3’UTR Splicing: important step Trasncription TSS ATG during gene expression exonintron exon intron exon pre−mNRA cap Variable splicing process 5’UTRGU AGGT AG 3’UTR (Alternative splicing) one Splicing AUG gene -> many proteins mRNA Translation protein Genes expression: genes to pro- teins
4
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Alternative Splicing pre−mRNA Gene Splicing: important step during gene expression Alternative Splicing Variable splicing process (Alternative splicing) one transcript isoforms gene -> many proteins Proteins One genes to many proteins
5
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Patterns of Alternative Splicing Constitutively Spliced Exon (CSE) Alternatively Spliced Exon (ASE) Exon skipping (most CSE ASE frequent) exon1exon2exon3exon4 Alternative 5’ splice sites Alternative 3’ splice sites Intron retention Mutually exclusive Here, focus on predicting alternatively spliced exons (ASE) and constitutively spliced exons (CSE) based on SVM
6
Alternative splicing Wet lab experiments finding AS is time Traditionally, align EST to genome alignments (limited to amount of EST available to the genome) Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Background & Motivation
7
Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Identifying Alternative Splicing in genome Transcripts Alternative splicing Wet lab experiments finding AS is time genomic DNA consuming Traditionally, align EST to genome alignments (limited to amount of EST available to the genome) Alternative 3’ Exon Exon Skipping
8
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Identifying Alternative Splicing in genome Alternative splicing Wet lab experiments finding AS is time consuming Traditionally, align EST to genome alignments (limited to amount of EST available to the genome) Use machine learning algorithms that to predict AS at the genome level
9
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Problem Definition Problem Definition: given an exon, can we predict it as alternatively spliced exons (ASE) or constitutively spliced exons (CSE)? Constitutively Spliced Exon (CSE) Alternatively Spliced Exon (ASE) CSE ASE CSE exon1exon2exon3exon4
10
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Problem Addressed and Our Approach Problem Definition predict alternatively spliced exons (ASE) vs constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) Task:Two-class (ASE and CSE) classification problem Need:Training data set containing labeled examples (ASE & CSE) Learning: Train classifier with training data Application: Predict unknown ASE Need features to represent ASEs & CSEs
11
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Problem Addressed and Our Approach Problem Definition predict alternatively spliced exons (ASE) vs constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) Task:Two-class (ASE and CSE) classification problem Need:Training data set containing labeled examples (ASE & CSE) Learning: Train classifier with training data Application: Predict unknown ASE Need features to represent ASEs & CSEs
12
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Problem Addressed and Our Approach Problem Definition predict alternatively spliced exons (ASE) vs constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) Task:Two-class (ASE and CSE) classification problem Need:Training data set containing labeled examples (ASE & CSE) Learning: Train classifier with training data Application: Predict unknown ASE Need features to represent ASEs & CSEs
13
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Problem Addressed and Our Approach Problem Definition predict alternatively spliced exons (ASE) vs constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) Task:Two-class (ASE and CSE) classification problem Need:Training data set containing labeled examples (ASE & CSE) Learning: Train classifier with training data Application: Predict unknown ASE Need features to represent ASEs & CSEs
14
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Problem Addressed and Our Approach Problem Definition predict alternatively spliced exons (ASE) vs constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Use Support Vector Machine (SVM) Task:Two-class (ASE and CSE) classification problem Need:Training data set containing labeled examples (ASE & CSE) Learning: Train classifier with training data Application: Predict unknown ASE Need features to represent ASEs & CSEs
15
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Data Set Published data set from the model organism, C. elegans (worm) Includes alternatively spliced exons (ASE) and constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Contains 487 ASEs and 2531 CSEs 100-base local sequences around splice sites Example of data set ASE GTACTATAGCGTGCTG....ACCGTTCGTACTCGCT ASE ATACTATAGCGTCTTG....ACCGATCGTACACGCT CSE GTACTATAGCGTCTTG....ACCGATCGTACTCGCT AG exon GT AG −100 0 +100 −100 0 +100
16
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Data Set Published data set from the model organism, C. elegans (worm) Includes alternatively spliced exons (ASE) and constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Contains 487 ASEs and 2531 CSEs 100-base local sequences around splice sites Example of data set ASE GTACTATAGCGTGCTG....ACCGTTCGTACTCGCT ASE ATACTATAGCGTCTTG....ACCGATCGTACACGCT CSE GTACTATAGCGTCTTG....ACCGATCGTACTCGCT AG exon GT AG −100 0 +100 −100 0 +100
17
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Data Set Published data set from the model organism, C. elegans (worm) Includes alternatively spliced exons (ASE) and constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Contains 487 ASEs and 2531 CSEs 100-base local sequences around splice sites Example of data set ASE GTACTATAGCGTGCTG....ACCGTTCGTACTCGCT ASE ATACTATAGCGTCTTG....ACCGATCGTACACGCT CSE GTACTATAGCGTCTTG....ACCGATCGTACTCGCT AG exon GT AG −100 0 +100 −100 0 +100
18
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Data Set Published data set from the model organism, C. elegans (worm) Includes alternatively spliced exons (ASE) and constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Contains 487 ASEs and 2531 CSEs 100- base local sequences around splice sites Previous work: Motifs captured and identified by kernel G. Ratch et al., Length of exons and flanking introns Sorek et al. Our work: Exploit more biologically significant features Use several additional approaches to derive features
19
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Data Set Published data set from the model organism, C. elegans (worm) Includes alternatively spliced exons (ASE) and constitutively spliced exons (CSE) Contains 487 ASEs and 2531 CSEs 100- base local sequences around splice sites Previous work: Motifs captured and identified by kernel G. Ratch et al., Length of exons and flanking introns Sorek et al. Our work: Exploit more biologically significant features Use several additional approaches to derive features
20
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Feature List Several features known to be biologically important Strength of splice sites (SSS) Motif features Intronic splicing regulator (ISR) Motifs derived from local sequences (MAST) Exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) Reduced set of motif features based on locations of motifs on secondary structure (MAST-R) Optimal folding energy (OPE) Basic sequence features (BSF)
21
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work SSS: Strength of Splice Site CGAG exon AGGTAAGT We consider all splice sites CGAG exon AGGTAAGT ∑ exon GGAG AGGTAGGT score = logF(X i ) F(X), CGAG exon AGGTTAGT i CCAG exon AGGTAAGT where X ∈ {A,U,G,C}. i ∈ {−3,+7} −3 +7 −26 +2 for 3’ splice sites (3’ss) and 3’ ss 5’ ss i ∈ {−26,+2} for 5’ splice sites (5’ss).
22
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Motif: sequence pattern that occurs repeatedly in group of sequences Intronic Splicing Regulator: identified in Kabat et al. MAST: derived by MEME using [-100,+100] sequence Exon Splicing Enhancers: based on two assumption ISR exon Illustration of ISR dispersed among sequences
23
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Motif: sequence pattern that occurs repeatedly in group of sequences Intronic Splicing Regulator: identified in Kabat et al. MAST: derived by MEME using [-100,+100] sequence Exon Splicing Enhancers: based on two assumption Example: a 20-base motif derived from sequences around splice sites
24
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Motif: sequence pattern that occurs repeatedly in group of sequences Intronic Splicing Regulator: identified in Kabat et al. MAST: derived by MEME using [-100,+100] sequence Exon Splicing Enhancers: based on two assumption more frequent in exons than in introns more frequent in exons with weak splice sites than in exons with strong splice sites ISR MAST ESE Motifs - dispersed among exons and introns
25
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Pre-mRNA secondary structures motif influence exon recognition AUCCAUGGGCCGGAUGUGACGGUAGUAGGGUAUACGUCACAUAGGCUUCCUCUCAUGA Located at different structure Secondary structure: derived from Mfold filter motifs using secondary structure Loop Stem Optimal Folding Energy: stability of RNA secondary structure
26
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work Pre-mRNA secondary structures motif influence exon recognition AUCCAUGGGCCGGAUGUGACGGUAGUAGGGUAUACGUCACAUAGGCUUCCUCUCAUGA Located at different structure Secondary structure: derived from Mfold filter motifs using secondary structure Loop Stem Optimal Folding Energy: stability of RNA secondary structure
27
Background & Motivation Problem Definition Problem & Feature Construction Data Set Experiments Design & Results Feature Construction Conclusions and Future Work GC content (G & C ratio),= A+U+G+C, characteristics of sequence Sequence length Length of exons and length of exons’ flanking introns frames of stop codons Summary of features Motif features Secondary structure Strength of splice sites Sequence features
28
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental Design List of previous defined features as SVM input Combination of different features to represent ASEs & CSEs split1split2split3split4split5 Tune SVM parameters to train (kernel linear, RBF.., Cost C) 20%80% 5−fold cross validation Choose parameters with best cross-validation (CV) accuracy Test trained SVM on testing ASEs & CSEs
29
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental Design List of previous defined features as SVM input Combination of different features to represent ASEs & CSEs split1split2split3split4split5 Tune SVM parameters to train (kernel linear, RBF.., Cost C) 20%80% 5−fold cross validation Choose parameters with best cross-validation (CV) accuracy Test trained SVM on testing ASEs & CSEs
30
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental Design List of previous defined features as SVM input Combination of different features to represent ASEs & CSEs split1split2split3split4split5 Tune SVM parameters to train (kernel linear, RBF.., Cost C) 20%80% 5−fold cross validation Choose parameters with best cross-validation (CV) accuracy Test trained SVM on testing ASEs & CSEs
31
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental Design List of previous defined features as SVM input Combination of different features to represent ASEs & CSEs split1split2split3split4split5 Tune SVM parameters to train (kernel linear, RBF.., Cost C) 20%80% 5−fold cross validation Choose parameters with best cross-validation (CV) accuracy Test trained SVM on testing ASEs & CSEs
32
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental Design List of previous defined features as SVM input Combination of different features to represent ASEs & CSEs split1split2split3split4split5 Tune SVM parameters to train (kernel linear, RBF.., Cost C) 20%80% 5−fold cross validation Choose parameters with best cross-validation (CV) accuracy Test trained SVM on testing ASEs & CSEs
33
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental results Results of alternatively spliced exon classification. All features, including ISR motifs, are used. CCross Validation ScoreTest score fp 1%AUC %fp 1%AUC% Split10.0532.4586.5556.4890.05 Split20.0539.3388.3252.0489.04 Split30.137.5687.7638.7187.97 Split40.0140.8689.0237.6384.42 Split50.136.4887.5035.7985.69
34
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental results 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 Mixed-Feas (85.55%) Base-Feas(78.78%) 0 00.20.40.60.81 False Positive Rate Comparison of ROC curves obtained using basic features only and basic features plus other mixed features (except conserved ISR motifs). Models trained using 5-fold CV with C = 1.
35
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Experimental results AUC score comparison between data sets with secondary struc- tural features and data sets without secondary structural fea- tures
36
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Motif Evaluation Intersection between motifs derived from sequences & intronic splicing regulators
37
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Motif Evaluation Conserved ESE in metazoans (animals), Human and Mouse
38
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature ConstructionExperimental Design Experiments Design & ResultsExperimental Results Conclusions and Future Work Motif Evaluation Comparison with A. thaliana
39
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Conclusion Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Conclusions Alternative splicing (AS) events can be found using transcripts Machine learning effectively used for prediction of AS events Identified features informative in predicting AS Explored comparatively comprehensive feature sets from biological point of view
40
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Conclusion Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Conclusions Alternative splicing (AS) events can be found using transcripts Machine learning effectively used for prediction of AS events Identified features informative in predicting AS Explored comparatively comprehensive feature sets from biological point of view
41
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Conclusion Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Conclusions Alternative splicing (AS) events can be found using transcripts Machine learning effectively used for prediction of AS events Identified features informative in predicting AS Explored comparatively comprehensive feature sets from biological point of view
42
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Conclusion Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Conclusions Alternative splicing (AS) events can be found using transcripts Machine learning effectively used for prediction of AS events Identified features informative in predicting AS Explored comparatively comprehensive feature sets from biological point of view
43
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Conclusion Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Future Work Apply this approach to specific organism Identify motifs more accurately Refine relationships between features (2nd Structure:w and motifs) Learn other types of AS events (not only skipped exons) adapted from "Detection of Alternative Splicing Events Using Machine Learning"
44
Background & Motivation Problem & Feature Construction Conclusion Experiments Design & Results Conclusions and Future Work Thank you for your attention! Questions? Related work RASE http://www.fml.tuebingen.mpg.de/raetsch/projects/RASE Acknowledgement data set from Dr. Ratsch’s FML group http://www.fml.tuebingen.mpg.de/raetsch/ projects/RASE/altsplicedexonsplits.tar.gz Dr. Caragea’s MLB group http://people.cis.ksu.edu/~dcaragea/mlb Dr. Brown’s Bininformatics Center at KSU http://bioinformatics.ksu.edu
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.