Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDominic Booth Modified over 9 years ago
1
Jun Seomun, Insup Shin, Youngsoo Shin Dept. of Electrical Engineering, KAIST DAC’ 10
2
Introduction Problem formulation Algorithm Experiments Conclusion
3
Active leakage is much larger than standby leakage (e.g. about 10× for 100 MHz frequency in room temperature [2]). The large proportion of active leakage in total active power consumption, e.g. 30% [3, 4] in 65-nm technology.
4
Active mode power gating (AMPG) [7] has been proposed to extend the application of power gating to reducing active leakage.
5
Active leakage
7
Input : ◦ A sequential circuit, which has clock-gating signals EN1,EN2,...,ENn. ◦ Signal ENi enables or disables a clock to a set of flip-flops Fi. Subject : ◦ Derive a set of gates Gi that are power-gated by ENi ◦ Meet three constraints: Functional Constraint Timing Constraint Current Constraint
10
clk EN1
11
Wakeup time
12
Modeling of discharge current 1
13
Estimation of MDC
14
Estimation of ADC ◦ p1 and p2 : the probability of signal being at logic high ◦ t1 and t2: transition probabilities ◦ these can be obtained by propagating signal probabilities at primary inputs [14]
16
ISCAS benchmark. which was synthesized [15] with commercial 1.1 V, 45-nm bulk CMOS technology.
18
They have presented a method to synthesize AMPG circuits. The key components in synthesis are the three constraints. The amount of saving in active leakage, 16% on average. A new placement algorithm specific to AMPG circuits or taking physical design into account during AMPG synthesis may alleviate this impact.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.