Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byFranklin Hopkins Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rural Economy Research Centre 1 Impact Of Greenhouse Gas Abatement Targets On Agricultural Activity Patrick Gillespie Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC) Teagasc RERC Seminar 21 st September, 2009
2
Rural Economy Research Centre 2 Introduction Background Methodology Results Conclusion/Discussion
3
Rural Economy Research Centre 3 Introduction National Reduction Target – 20% to 30% on 2005 levels by 2020 Member States decide how to meet targets Emissions Trading Scheme Non-ETS sectors No specific reduction targets for Agriculture (to date), however… Prominence of Agriculture makes sig. reduction target likely
4
Rural Economy Research Centre 4 Introduction What effect will various reductions have? Policy Question - What is an appropriate target for Agriculture? Ultimately a Political decision, this analysis informs that debate What profile will Agriculture have in a sustainable Irish economy? ESRI ISus project FAPRI-Ireland GHG as subcomponent What effect has the downturn had already w.r.t. GHGs from Irish Ag? ‘Silver Lining’ Hypothesis? Latest Update – Sept. 2009 Preliminary Results
5
Rural Economy Research Centre 5 Background Agriculture is a significant component (>25%) of total Irish GHG Emission Ambitious reduction targets are likely Livestock based production is dominant in Ireland Bovines are a major GHG source (CH 4 Methane and N 2 O Nitrous Oxide) Agriculture is not part of the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) Therefore, no prospect for buying further emissions rights in this sector other non-ETS sources include transport, households, services, small industrial installations & waste Irish Agriculture constituted about 40% of non-ETS sector in 2006
6
Rural Economy Research Centre 6 Background
7
Rural Economy Research Centre 7 Background
8
Rural Economy Research Centre 8 Background IPCC & EPA Classifications EPA responsible for GHG accounts EPA follows IPCC methodology Tiered Hierarchy Default Emission Factors Research into Country/Region specific EFs encouraged Default EFs used for all except cattle
9
Rural Economy Research Centre 9 Background Data Sources Primarily Central Statistics Office DAFF SEI EPA and Teagasc Main Reporting Documents NIR - National Inventory Reports (Govt. & Public) CRF - Common Reporting Format (IPCC)
10
Rural Economy Research Centre 10
11
Rural Economy Research Centre 11
12
Rural Economy Research Centre 12
13
Rural Economy Research Centre 13
14
Rural Economy Research Centre 14
15
Rural Economy Research Centre 15
16
Rural Economy Research Centre 16
17
Rural Economy Research Centre 17 Methodology FAPRI-Ireland GHG model A partial equilibrium economic model of Irish agriculture The model simulates over a 10/15 year horizon and projects crop areas harvested and animal inventories commodity supply and use balances input and output prices Input use and expenditures sector output, input and income accounts The model is nested within a larger model of EU and global agriculture This allows it to incorporate market and policy developments at EU (CAP reform) and International levels (WTO) Model converts agricultural activities to emissions
18
Rural Economy Research Centre 18
19
Rural Economy Research Centre 19
20
Rural Economy Research Centre 20
21
Rural Economy Research Centre 21
22
Rural Economy Research Centre 22 Methodology Interactions with ESRI models Inputs from HERMES Population, Price Deflators, Industrial Wage Rate, GDP, and Exchange Rates Outputs to ISus CH4, N2O, NH3, Output, Fertilisers, Pesticides, Energy FAPRI-Ireland GHG spreadsheet based, ESRI models use MATLAB Full conversion to MATLAB originally planned Resource constraints (software licenses) made that infeasible Now GHG calculation for Agriculture happens in the Excel based model, and outputs are exported back to the larger ISus model
23
Rural Economy Research Centre 23 Methodology Model Interactions
24
Rural Economy Research Centre 24 Methodology Commodity model provides Livestock numbers, enterprise areas and input applications Livestock emission factors provide amount of methane produced by the animal on an annual basis vary by animal type (dairy cow highest, horses, goats lowest) Emissions factors for fertiliser & animal waste Converted to Methane and Nitrous Oxide GWP factors used to bring to common base of Carbon Dioxide equivalents (CO2 Eq.)
25
Rural Economy Research Centre 25 Methodology
26
Rural Economy Research Centre 26 Meeting National Objectives New targets for Irish GHG emissions for 2020 10% reduction on 2005 (target about 17.1 Mt CO2 Eq.) 20% reduction on 2005 (target about 15.3 Mt CO2 Eq.) 30% reduction on 2005 (target about 13.3 Mt CO2 Eq.)
27
Rural Economy Research Centre 27 Results - Reference Run 2020 compared with 2005 Total cattle population ↓ 11% Beef production ↓ 10% Cattle prices ↑13% Prices rise as EU production falls Operating surplus ↓ 5% GHG reduction of 10% almost met
28
Rural Economy Research Centre 28 Results - 30% GHG Reduction 2020 compared with 2005 Total cattle population ↓ 35% Beef production ↓ 32% Cattle prices ↑16% Prices rise as EU production falls Value of cattle output ↓ Total input expenditure ↓ more Operating surplus ↑ 2% GHG reduction of 30% achieved
29
Rural Economy Research Centre 29 Reference Run Results 2020 compared with 2005
30
Rural Economy Research Centre 30 Results and discussion GHG emissions reduction scenario 30% reduction in agriculture’s GHG emissions by 2020 Very large fall in suckler cow numbers required if adjustment were only to occur in suckler cow numbers By 2020 the suckler herd would have to decline by over 70% Such a decline leads to a 35% decline in total cattle numbers and total beef production Beef output value would decline by 23%
31
Rural Economy Research Centre 31 Results and discussion Reference Scenario Results By 2020 Agricultural GHG emissions projected to decline by 8.5% versus 2005 Decline in emissions largely due to projected reductions in cattle numbers This decline driven by projected contraction in suckler cow numbers Dairy cow numbers increase as milk quota increases and is eliminated in 2015 Increased dairy cow numbers lead to increased GHG emissions but these are more than offset by reduced suckler cow numbers
32
Rural Economy Research Centre 32 Results and discussion Update Reference Run GHG emissions now projected to be slightly lower in 2020 (↓ 0.17% relative to original reference run) Very little change from original reference run, probably down to Income inelastic demand Export focus in agriculture Sunk costs (investment in Cattle) Results still being worked through
33
Rural Economy Research Centre 33 Conclusions Sheep 6% Pigs 3% Other Livestock 0% Cattle 70% Soil Emissions 21% Poultry 0% Decomposition of CO2-equivalent GHG Emissions
34
Rural Economy Research Centre 34 Conclusions 1 Million Suckler Cows1 Million Dairy Cows ProgenyProgeny Beef Production Dairy
35
Rural Economy Research Centre 35 Conclusions Irish Agri sector is highly export focused 90% of beef exported 80% of dairy products exported Need a global dimension to modelling framework Prospects for Irish agriculture are largely influenced by factors external to Ireland World Ag Model EU Ag Model Ireland Ag Model Macro Models GHG Model
36
Rural Economy Research Centre 36 Conclusions Adoption of new abatement technologies will reduce the need for policy based GHG reduction strategies However, such technologies will not get us all the way to the targets Reductions in the levels of Irish agricultural activity are likely to be necessary, but such reductions will not realistically occur in the short term and policy must reflect this. Our analysis illustrates the magnitude of the reductions in levels of agricultural activity that would be required in the absence of new abatement technologies
37
Rural Economy Research Centre 37 Conclusions The effect of the downturn is less than dramatic Food demand is income inelastic Cattle are a not a short term investment and are a sig. sunk cost, culling highly improbable Irish Ag is export focused Some markets not as badly effected £ Sterling depreciation hurts value of exports to UK Even apparent worsening of value of exports to UK doesn’t necessarily correspond to drastic reduction in animal production Little if any ‘silver lining’ to this cloud
38
Rural Economy Research Centre 38 Conclusions Assumptions and Uncertainties Policy uncertainty is a major unknown Agricultural policy is frequently changing Environmental Policy Global (e.g. WTO) EU (e.g. CAP Reform, milk quota) Domestic Main driver in history Agricultural policy Main driver in the future market based supply and demand factors Macro outlook, exchange rates, population growth
39
Rural Economy Research Centre 39 Thank You
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.